Inhibition of enteropathogens adhesion to human enterocyte-like HT-29 cells by a dairy strain of Propionibacterium acidipropionici

Beneficial Microbes

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 431-441

  Zarate G ^a   Palacios, J M ^a   Villena, J ^b   Zuniga Hansen M E ^c  

^a CENTRO DE REFERENCIA PARA LACTOBACILOS CERELA CONICET   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

^c PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Enteropathogens; Probiotics; Propionibacteria

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CELL SURFACE PROTEIN; PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BINDING COMPETITION; CELL ADHESION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY PRODUCT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTION; HT 29 CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INTESTINE CELL; INTESTINE FLORA; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; NONHUMAN; PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACIDIPROPIONICI; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLOSIS; ANTIBIOSIS; HT-29 CELL LINE; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPIONIBACTERIUM;

ANTIBIOSIS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; ENTEROCYTES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HT29 CELLS; HUMANS; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

EID: 84971673107     PISSN: 18762883     EISSN: 18762891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/BM2015.0144     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Azcarate-Peril, M.A. and Klaenhammer, T.R., 2010. Genomics of lactic acid bacteria: the post-genomics challenge - from sequence to function. In: Mozzi, F., Raya, R.R. and Vignolo, G.M. (eds.) Biotechnology of lactic acid bacteria: novel applications. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 35-56.
2. Chen, X., Xu, J., Shuai, J., Chen, J., Zhang, Z. and Fang, W., 2007. The S-layer proteins of Lactobacillus crispatus strain ZJ001 is responsible for competitive exclusion against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium. International Journal of Food Microbiology 115: 307-312.
3. Collado, M.C., Gueimonde, M. and Salminen, S., 2010. Probiotics in adhesion of pathogens: mechanisms of action. In: Watson, R.R. and Preedy, V.R. (eds.) Bioactive foods in promoting health. Probiotics and Prebiotics. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 353-370.
4. Collado, M.C., Meriluoto, J. and Salminen, S., 2007. Role of commercial probiotic strains against human pathogen adhesion to intestinal mucus. Letters in Applied Microbiology 45: 454-460.
5. Cousin, F., Mater, D.D.G., Foligné, B. and Jan, G., 2011. Dairy propionibacteria as human probiotics: a review of recent evidence. Dairy Science and Technology 91: 1-26.
6. Dhanani, A.S. and Bagchi, T., 2013. Lactobacillus plantarum CS24.2 prevents E. coli adhesion to HT-29 cells and also downregulates enteropathogen induced TNFalpha and IL-8 expression. Microbiology and Immunology 57: 309-315.
7. Falentin, H., Deutsch, S.M., Jan, G., Loux, V., Thierry, A. and Parayre, S., 2010. The complete genome of Propionibacterium freudenreichii CIRM-BIA1, a hardy actinobacterium with food and probiotic applications. PloS One 5: e11748.
8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO), 2002. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/ou88oa2.
9. Garriga, M., Rubio, R., Aymerich, T. and Ruas-Madiedo, P., 2014. Potentially probiotic and bioprotective lactic acid bacteria starter cultures antagonise the Listeria monocytogenes adhesion to HT29 colonocyte-like cells. Beneficial Microbes 6: 337-343.
10. Gueimonde, M., Jalonen, L., He, F., Hiramatsu, M. and Salminen, S., 2006. Adhesion and competitive inhibition and displacement of human enteropathogens by selected lactobacilli. Food Research International 39: 467-471.
11. Huang, Y. and Adams, M.C., 2003. An in vitro model for investigating intestinal adhesion of potential dairy propionibacteria probiotic strains using cell line C2BBe1. Letters in Applied Microbiology 36: 213-216.
12. Johnson-Henry, K.C., Hagen, K.E., Gordonpour, M., Tompkins, T.A. and Sherman, P.M., 2007. Surface-layer protein extracts from Lactobacillus helveticus inhibit enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to epithelial cells. Cellular Microbiology 9: 356-367.
13. Laparra, J.M. and Sanz, Y., 2009. Comparison of in vitro models to study bacterial adhesion to the intestinal epithelium. Letters in Applied Microbiology 49: 695-701.
14. Le Maréchal, C., Peton, V., Plé, C., Vroland, C., Jardin, J. and Briard-Bion, V., 2015. Surface proteins of Propionibacterium freudenreichii are involved in its anti-inflammatory properties. Journal of Proteomics 112: 447-461.
15. Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J. and De Keersmaecker, S.C., 2010. Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nature Reviews Microbiology 8: 171-184.
16. Lee, Y.K., Puong, K.Y., Ouwehand, A.C. and Salminen, S., 2003. Displacement of bacterial pathogens from mucus and Caco-2 cell surface by lactobacilli. Journal of Medical Microbiology 52: 925-930.
17. Lehto, E.M. and Salminen, S., 1997. Adhesion of two Lactobacillus strains, one Lactococcus and one Propionibacterium strain to cultured human intestinal Caco-2 cell line. Bioscience and Microflora 16: 13-17.
18. Leuschner, R.G.K., Robinson, T.P., Hugas, M., Cocconcelli, P.S., Richard-Forget, F. and Klein, G., 2010. Qualified presumption of safety (QPS): a generic risk assessment approach for biological agents notified to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Trends in Food Science and Technology 21: 425-435.
19. Li, X.J., Yue, L.Y., Guan, X.F. and Qiao, S.Y., 2008. The adhesion of putative probiotic lactobacilli to cultured cells and porcine intestinal mucus. Journal of Applied Microbiology 104: 1082-1091.
20. Livins'ka, O.P., Garmasheva, I.L. and Kovalenko, N.K., 2013. The influence of teichoic acids from probiotic lactobacilli on microbial adhesion to epithelial cells. Mikrobiolohichnyĭ Zhurnal 74: 16-22.
21. Lorenzo-Pisarello, M.J., Gultemirian, M.L., Nieto-Peñalver, C. and Pérez Chaia, A., 2010. Propionibacterium acidipropionici CRL 1198 influences the production of acids and the growth of bacterial genera stimulated by inulin in a murine model of cecal slurries. Anaerobe 16: 345-354.
22. Myllyluoma, E., Ahonen, A.M., Korpela, R., Vapaatalo, H. and Kankuri, E., 2008. Effects of multispecies probiotic combination on Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 15: 1472-1482.
23. Ofek, I., Hasty, D.L. and Sharon, N., 2003. Anti-adhesion therapy of bacterial diseases: prospects and problems. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 38: 181-191.
24. Osset, J., Bartolome, R.M., García, E. and Andreu, A., 2001. Assessment of the capacity of Lactobacillus to inhibit the growth of uropathogens and block their adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells. Journal of Infection Disease 183: 485-491.
25. Ouwehand, A.C. and Salminen, S., 2003. In vitro adhesion assays for probiotics and their in vivo relevance: a review. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 15: 175-184.
26. Ouwehand, A., Tölkko, S., Kulmala, J., Salminen, S. and Salminen, E., 2000. Adhesion of inactivated probiotic strains to intestinal mucus. Letters in Applied Microbiology 31: 82-86.
27. Pérez Chaia, A. and Zárate, G., 2005. Dairy propionibacteria from milk or cheese diets remain viable and enhance propionic acid production in the mouse caecum. Lait 85: 85-98.
28. Pérez Chaia, A., Zárate, G. and Oliver, G., 1999. The probiotic properties of propionibacteria. Lait 79: 175-185.
29. Ranadheera, C.S., Evans, C.A., Adams, M.C. and Baines, S.K., 2012. In vitro analysis of gastrointestinal tolerance and intestinal cell adhesion of probiotics in goat's milk ice cream and yogurt. Food Research International 49: 619-625.
30. Ren, D., Li, C., Qin, Y., Yin, R., Li, X. and Tian, M., 2012. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus adherence to Caco-2 cells by lactobacilli and cell surface properties that influence attachment. Anaerobe 18: 508-515.
31. Ribet, D. and Cossart, P., 2015. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microbes and Infection 17: 173-183.
32. Sengupta, R., Altermann, E., Anderson, R.C., McNabb, W.C., Moughan, P.J. and Roy, N.C., 2013. The role of cell surface architecture of lactobacilli in host-microbe interactions in the gastrointestinal tract. Mediators of Inflammation 2013: 237921.
33. Tareb, R., Bernardeau, M., Gueguen, M. and Vernoux, J.-P., 2013. In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria, especially Campylobacter jejuni. Journal of Medical Microbiology 62: 637-649.
34. Thiel, A., Eikmanns, B., Salminen, S. and Ouwehand, A.C., 2004. In vitro adhesion of propionibacteria to human intestinal mucus. Journal of Food Science 16: 245-254.
35. Tripathi, M.K. and Giri, S.K., 2014. Probiotic functional foods: survival of probiotics during processing and storage. Journal of Functional Foods 9: 225-241.
36. Zárate, G. and Nader-Macías, M.E., 2006. Influence of probiotic vaginal lactobacilli on in vitro adhesion of urogenital pathogens to vaginal epithelial cells. Letters in Applied Microbiology 43: 174-180.
37. Zárate, G. and Pérez Chaia, A., 2012a. Influence of lactose and lactate on growth and β-galactosidase activity of potential probiotic Propionibacterium acidipropionici. Anaerobe 18: 25-30.
38. Zárate, G. and Pérez Chaia, A., 2012b. Feeding with dairy Propionibacterium acidipropionici CRL 1198 reduces the incidence of concanavalin-A induced alterations in mouse small intestinal epithelium. Food Research International 47: 13-22.
39. Zárate, G. and Pérez Chaia, A., 2015. Propionibacteria also have probiotic potential. In: Venema, K. and Do Carmo, A.P. (eds.) Probiotics and prebiotics: current research and future trends. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, pp. 69-91.
40. Zárate, G., Chaia, A.P., Gonzalez, S. and Oliver, G., 2000. Viability and beta-galactosidase activity of dairy propionibacteria subjected to digestion by artificial gastric and intestinal fluids. Journal of Food Protection 63: 1214-1221.
41. Zarate, G., Morata de Ambrosini, V.I., Pérez Chaia, A. and Gonzalez, S.N., 2002a. Adhesion of dairy propionibacteria to intestinal epithelial tissue in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Food Protection 65: 534-539.
42. Zárate, G., Morata de Ambrosini, V., Pérez Chaia, A. and González, S., 2002b. Some factors affecting the adherence Propionibacterium acidipropionici CRL1198 to intestinal epithelial cells. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 48: 449-457.
43. Zarate, G., Pérez Chaia, A. and Oliver, G., 2003. Some characteristics of practical relevance of the b-Galactosidase from potential probiotic strains of Propionibacterium acidipropionici. Anaerobe 8: 259-267.
44. Zivkovic, M., Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C., Kojic, M., Gueimonde, M., Golic, N. and Ruas-Madiedo, P., 2015. Capability of exopolysaccharideproducing Lactobacillus paraplantarum BGCG11 and its non-producing isogenic strain NB1, to counteract the effect of enteropathogens upon the epithelial cell line HT29-MTX. Food Research International 74: 199-207.