Structural validity of the Dutch version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-NL) in patients with hand and wrist injuries

Physical Therapy

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 908-916

  El Moumni, Mostafa ^a   van Eck, Merit E ^a   Wendt, Klaus W ^a   Reininga, Inge H F ^a   Mokkink, Lidwine Brigitta ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COMPLICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABILITY; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HAND INJURY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; NETHERLANDS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; WRIST INJURY;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HAND INJURIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; NETHERLANDS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WRIST INJURIES;

EID: 84971517394     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140589     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Available at: http:// www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.Accessed September 10, 2014.
2. Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;309:814–822.
3. Hoang-Kim A, Pegreffi F, Moroni A, Ladd A. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:253–258.
4. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608.
5. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–1046.
6. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:575–587.
7. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, et al. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:577–586.
8. © User Manual. Available at: http://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/ uploads/2015/05/English-PRWE-User-Manual.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2014.
9. MacDermid JC, Tottenham V. Responsiveness of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist/ Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:18–23.
10. Voche P, Dubert T, Laffargue C, Gosp- Server A. Patient-rated wrist questionnaire: preliminary report on a proposed French version of a North American questionnaire designed to assess wrist pain and function [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003;89:443–448.
11. Wah JW, Wang MK, Ping CL. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE–Hong Kong version). J Hand Ther. 2006;19:18–26, quiz 27.
12. John M, Angst F, Awiszus F, et al. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE): cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26:1047–1058.
13. Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, et al. Reliability and validity of the German version of “the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther. 2008; 21:366–376.
14. Wilcke MT, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43:94–101.
15. Mellstrand Navarro C, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H, et al. Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE–Swe). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:171.
16. Brink SM, Voskamp EG, Houpt P, Emmelot CH. Psychometric properties of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation–Dutch Language Version (PRWH/E-DLV). J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34:556–557.
17. Imaeda T, Uchiyama S, Wada T, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15: 509–517.
18. Fairplay T, Atzei A, Corradi M, et al. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/ Hand Evaluation Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37:863–870.
19. Mehta SP, Mhatre B, MacDermid JC, Mehta A. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Hindi version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. J Hand Ther. 2012;25:65–77, quiz 78.
20. Kim JK, Kang JS. Evaluation of the Korean version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:238–243, quiz 244.
21. Schonnemann JO, Hansen TB, Soballe K. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47:489–492.
22. Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, et al. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002;15: 347–354.
23. Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 1994;39:135–140.
24. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
25. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010.
26. Babyak MA, Green SB. Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Psychosom Med. 2010;72:587–597.
27. Chen F, West S, Sousa K. A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behav Res. 2006; 41:189–225.
28. Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.
29. H: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70:123–133.
30. McDonald RP. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc Publishers; 1999.
31. Gignac GE, Palmer BR, Stough C. A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS-20: corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement. J Pers Assess. 2007;89:247–257.
32. Reise SP. Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behav Res. 2012;47:667–696.
33. Ten Berge JMF, Socan G. The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika. 2004;69:613–625.
34. Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36.
35. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2015. Available at: http://www. R-project.org/. Accessed November 10, 2014.
36. Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
37. Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2006.
38. Hogarty KY. The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: the influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educ Psychol Meas. 2005;65:202–206.
39. Comrey A, Lee H, eds. A First Course in Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc Publishers; 1992.
40. MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther. 1996;9:178–183.
41. Packham T, MacDermid JC. Measurement properties of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:216–223, quiz 224.
42. Reise SP, Moore TM, Haviland MG. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. J Pers Assess. 2010;92:544–559.
43. Sinharay S, Puhan G. Subscores based on classical test theory: to report or not to report. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2007:21–23.
44. Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006; 17:413–418.