Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 489-492

  Schønnemann, Jesper O ^a   Hansen, Torben B ^a   Søballe, Kjeld ^b  

^a HOLSTEBRO HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Danish version; PRWE; Reliability; Translation; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DENMARK; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FRACTURE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE); VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; WRIST INJURY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENMARK; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSLATING; WRIST INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888052385     PISSN: 2000656X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.787934     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brogren E, Petranek M, Atroshi I. Incidence and characteristics of distal radius fractures in a southern Swedish region. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:48.
2. Margaliot Z, Haase SC, Kotsis SV, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg 2005;30A:1185-99.
3. Shin EK, Jupiter JB. Current concepts in the management of distal radius fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2007; 74:233-46.
4. Handoll HH, Madhok R, Howe TE. Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3: CD003324.
5. Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose? Int Orthop 2008;32:1-6.
6. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46: 1417-32.
7. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14: 128-46.
8. MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther 1996;9:178-83.
9. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, et al. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:577-86.
10. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, et al. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg 2000;25A:330-40.
11. Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, et al. Reliability and validity of the German version of "the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)" as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 2008; 21:366-76.
12. Wilcke MT, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009;43:94-101.
13. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36-health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992;305:160-4.
14. Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Groenvold M. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1001-11.
15. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980;34:281-6.
16. Thorsen H, McKenna SP, Gottschalck L. The Danish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: its adaptation and reliability. Scand J Prim Health Care 1993;11:124-9.
17. Thorsen H. Healthstatus Objectives. Experiences with Edinburgh Rehabilitation Status Scale and Nottingham Health Profile. Copenhagen, Denmark: FADL forlag; 1995.
18. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:268-74.
19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
20. Swaine-Verdier A, Doward LC, Hagell P, et al. Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Health 2004;7:S27-30.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997;314: 572.
22. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998;26:217-38.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
25. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1998;80B:63-9.