Measuring Outcome after Wrist Injury: Translation and Validation of the Swedish Version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-Swe)

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Mellstrand Navarro, Cecilia ^a   Ponzer, Sari ^a   Törnkvist, Hans ^a   Ahrengart, Leif ^a   Bergström, Gunnar ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

cross cultural adaptation; DASH; distal radius; PRWE; validity; Wrist fracture

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT RATED WRIST EVALUATION SWEDISH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SWEDEN; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; WRIST INJURY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISABILITY; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF EVALUATION; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DIAGNOSTIC SELF EVALUATION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; TRANSLATING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRIST INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960560408     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-171     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Outcomes research in orthopedics: history, perspectives, concepts, and future. DD Bradham, Arthroscopy 1994 5 493 501 (Pubitemid 24296319)
2. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). PL Hudak, PC Amadio, C Bombardier, Am J Ind Med 1996 6 602 8
3. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. DE Beaton, JN Katz, AH Fossel, JG Wright, V Tarasuk, C Bombardier, J Hand Ther 2001 2 128 46 (Pubitemid 32463650)
4. The DASH questionnaire and score in the evaluation of hand and wrist disorders. L De Smet, Acta Orthop Belg 2008 5 575 81
5. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. I Atroshi, C Gummesson, B Andersson, E Dahlgren, A Johansson, Acta Orthop Scand 2000 6 613 8
6. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. AS Dowrick, BJ Gabbe, OD Williamson, PA Cameron, Injury 2005 4 468 76 (Pubitemid 40332328)
7. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose? M Changulani, U Okonkwo, T Keswani, Y Kalairajah, Int Orthop 2008 1 1 6 (Pubitemid 351170105)
8. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. JC MacDermid, RS Richards, A Donner, N Bellamy, JH Roth, J Hand Surg Am 2000 2 330 40 (Pubitemid 30165598)
9. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. JC MacDermid, V Tottenham, J Hand Ther 2004 1 18 23 (Pubitemid 38222711)
10. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. F Guillemin, C Bombardier, D Beaton, J Clin Epidemiol 1993 12 1417 32 (Pubitemid 24017263)
11. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. DE Beaton, C Bombardier, F Guillemin, M Ferraz, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 24 3186 91 (Pubitemid 32042951)
12. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. JC MacDermid, J Hand Ther 1996 2 178 83 (Pubitemid 26192874)
13. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. JC MacDermid, T Turgeon, RS Richards, M Beadle, JH Roth, J Orthop Trauma 1998 8 577 86 (Pubitemid 128454985)
14. AN Oppenheim, Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement Pinter Publisher: London and New York 1992
15. Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. EE Ghiselli, JP Campbell, S Zedeck, Chapter 9: Estimating reliability of measurement W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco 1981 230 264
16. G Dunn, Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies Oxford University Press, New York 1989
17. Psychological testing and assessment. RJ Cohen, ME Swerdlik, SM Phillips, Chapter 6: Validity Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, California 1996 174 217
18. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. DE Beaton, S Hogg-Johnson, C Bombardier, J Clin Epidemiol 1997 1 79 93 (Pubitemid 27089210)
19. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. DE Beaton, JG Wright, JN Katz, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 5 1038 46 (Pubitemid 40617572)
20. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. CP Gabel, M Yelland, M Melloh, B Burkett, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009 10 161 10.1186/1471-2474-10-161 20021677
21. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. MT Wilcke, H Abbaszadegan, PY Adolphson, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009 2 94 101
22. Shoulder pain and functional consequences: does it differ when it is at dominant side or not? N Ozaras, M Cidem, S Demir, O Suyabatmaz, O Solak, M Esenyel, J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2009 4 223 5