Corrigendum to “Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses” (Journal of Mathematical Psychology (2016) 72 (90–103), (S002224961600002X) (10.1016/j.jmp.2015.12.007));Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 72, Issue , 2016, Pages 90-103

  Bayarri, M J ^a   Benjamin, Daniel J ^b   Berger, James O ^c   Sellke, Thomas M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayes factors; Bayesian; Frequentist; Odds

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971324051     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: 10960880     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2019.03.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Anscombe F.J. Fixed-sample-size analysis of sequential observations. Biometrics 1954, 10(1):89-100.
2. Bem D.J. Feeling the Future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100(3):407-425.
3. Benjamin D.J., Choi J.J., Strickland A.J. Social identity and preferences. American Economic Review 2010, 100:1913-1928.
4. Berger J. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis 1985, Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. Berger J. Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing (with Discussion)?. Statistical Science 2003, 18:1-32.
6. Berger J., Berry D. The relevance of stopping rules in statistical inference (with Discussion). Statistical decision theory and related topics IV 1988, Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Berger J., Boukai B., Wang Y. Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis (with discussion). Statistical Science 1997, 12(3):133-160.
8. Berger J., Brown L., Wolpert R. A unified conditional frequentist and Bayesian test for fixed and sequential hypothesis testing. The Annals of Statistics 1994, 22:1787-1807.
9. Berger J., Mortera J. Default Bayes factors for non-nested hypothesis testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999, 94:542-554.
10. Berger K., Pericchi L. Objective Bayesian methods for model selection: introduction and comparison (with Discussion). Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes - Monograph Series 2001, vol. 38:135-207. Beachwood Ohio. P. Lahiri (Ed.).
11. Berger J., Pericchi L. Bayes factors. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics reference Online 2015, 1-14.
12. Button K.S., Ioannidis J.P.A., Mokrysz C., Nosek B.A., Flint J., Robinson E.S.J., et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013, 14:365-376.
13. Chambers C., Feredoes E., Muthukumaraswamy S.D., Etchells P. Instead of "Playing the Game" it is time to change the rules: Registered reports at AIMS neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience 2014, 1:4-17.
14. Coffman L.C., Niederle M. Pre-analysis plans have limited upside especially where replications are feasible. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2015, 29(3):81-98.
15. Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1962, 65:145-153.
16. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. Dass S., Berger J. Unified Bayesian and conditional frequentist testing of composite hypotheses. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2003, 30:193-210.
18. Dreber A., Pfeiffer T., Almenberg J., Isaksson S., Wilson B., Chen Y., et al. Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2015, 112(50):15343-15347.
19. Edwards W., Lindman H., Savage L. Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review 1963, 70(3):193-242.
20. Elgersma, K., & Green, E. 2011. How often are ecologists wrong? Lindley's paradox in ecology. Rutgers University mimeo.
21. Fischhoff B. Hindsight ≠ foresight. The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1975, 1(3):288-299.
22. Fischhoff B., Beyth-Marom R. Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review 1983, 90(3):239-260.
23. Garner C. Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 2007, 31:288-295.
24. Gelman A., Carlin J. Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2014, 9(6):641-651.
25. Gilbert P., Berger J., Stablein D., Becker S., Essex M., Hammer S., et al. Statistical interpretation of the RV144 HIV vaccine efficacy trial in Thailand: A case study for statistical issues in efficacy trials. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2011, 203(7):969-975.
26. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2005, 2(8):124.
27. Ioannidis J.P.A. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008, 168(4):374-383.
28. John L.K., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science 2012, 23(5):524-532.
29. Johnson V. Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110(48):19313-19317.
30. Kruschke J.K. Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2011, 6(3):299-312.
31. Locke A.E., et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 2015, 518:197-206.
32. Lucas M. Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2000, 6:618-630.
33. Lucke J.F. A critique of the false-positive report probability. Genetic Epidemiology 2009, 33:145-150.
34. Masson M.E.J. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavioural Research 2011, 43:679-690.
35. Neyman J. Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics. Synthese 1977, 36:97-131.
36. Olken B. Promises and perils of pre-analysis plans. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2015, 29(3):61-80.
37. Richard F.D., Bond C.F., Stokes-Zoota J.J. One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology 2003, 7(4):331-363.
38. Rietveld C.A., et al. GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science 2013, 340(6139):1467-1471.
39. Rietveld C.A., et al. Replicability and robustness of genome-wide-association studies for behavioral traits. Psychological Science 2014, 25(11):1975-1986.
40. Ripke S., et al. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 2014, 511:421-427.
41. Rosenthal R. The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86(3):641-838.
42. Schkade D.A., Kahneman D. Does living in california make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science 1998, 9(5):340-346.
43. Sellke T.M. On the interpretation of p-values, Tech. Rep 2012, Department of Statistics, Purdue University.
44. Sellke T., Bayarri M.J., Berger J.O. Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses. The American Statistician 2001, 55:62-71.
45. Vankov I., Bowers J., Munafò M.R. On the persistence of low power in psychological science. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2014, 67(5):1037-1040.
46. Visscher P.M., Brown M.A., McCarthy M.I., Yang J. Five years of GWAS discovery. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2012, 90(1):7-24.
47. Vovk V.G. A logic of probability, with application to the foundations of statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 1993, 55:317-351.
48. Wacholder S., Chanock S., Garcia-Closas M., El ghormli L., Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004, 96(6):434-442.
49. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Verhagen, A.J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Rouder, J.N., Lilienfeld, S.O., & Waldman, I. et al. (in press). The need for Bayesian hypothesis testing in psychological science. In Psychological science under scrutiny: Recent challenges and proposed solutions. John Wiley and Sons.
50. Wagenmakers E.-J., Wetzels R., Borsboom D., van der Maas H.L.J. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100:426-432.
51. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3000 shared controls. Nature 2007, 447(7145):661-678. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium.
52. Wood A.R., et al. Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nature Genetics 2014, 46:1173-1186.
53. Zhang, L., & Ortmann, A. (2013). Exploring the Meaning of Significance in Experimental Economics. Australian School of Business Research Paper 2013-32. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2356018.