Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 95, Issue 18, 2016, Pages e3497-

  Xiong, Junjie ^a   Szatmary, Peter ^b   Huang, Wei ^a   Iglesia Garcia, Daniel De La ^c   Nunes, Quentin M ^b   Xia, Qing ^a   Hu, Weiming ^a   Sutton, Robert ^b   Liu, Xubao ^a   Raraty, Michael G ^b  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; OCTREOTIDE; PROKINETIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL DRAIN; BODY MASS; DELAYED GASTRIC EMPTYING; ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FOLEY BALLOON CATHETER; GENDER; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PATIENT SAFETY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATIC FISTULA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOMACH EMPTYING; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AFTERCARE; ECONOMICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REHABILITATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AFTERCARE; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 84969834514     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003497     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630-641.
2. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473-476.
3. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466-477.
4. Barbieri A, Vanhaecht K, Van Herck P, et al. Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2009;7:32.
5. Weber WP, Barry M, Junqueira MJ, et al. Initial experiences with a multidisciplinary approach to decreasing the length of hospital stay for patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy. EJSO. 2011;37: 944-949.
6. Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245:867-872.
7. Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg. 2013;37:1909-1918.
8. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009;144: 961-969.
9. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS (R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012;31: 817-830.
10. Porter GA, Pisters PW, Mansyur C, et al. Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:484-489.
11. Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, et al. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution-the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:917-923discussion 923-914.
12. Vanounou T, Pratt W, Fischer JE, et al. Deviation-based cost modeling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204: 570-579.
13. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, et al. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1387-1393.
14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
15. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.
16. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761-768.
17. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1050-1061.
18. Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P, et al. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1196-1208.
19. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for nonrandomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712-716.
20. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
21. Demets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Stat Med. 1987;6:341-350.
22. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.
23. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in metaanalysis. BMJ. 2001;323:101-105.
24. Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Badran A, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery programme after pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-centre UK pilot study. Pancreatology. 2013;13:58-62.
25. Nikfarjam M, Weinberg L, Low N, et al. A fast track recovery program significantly reduces hospital length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP. 2013;14:63-70.
26. Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ariotti R, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:2960-2966.
27. Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, Chigharoe A, et al. Improving outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: experiences with implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Dig Surg. 2014;31:177-184.
28. Kobayashi S, Ooshima R, Koizumi S, et al. Perioperative care with fast-track management in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:2430-2437.
29. Pillai SA, Palaniappan R, Pichaimuthu A, et al. Feasibility of implementing fast-track surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy for reconstruction-a prospective cohort study with historical control. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1005-1009.
30. Nussbaum DP, Penne K, Stinnett SS, et al. A standardized care plan is associated with shorter hospital length of stay in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res. 2015;193: 237-245.
31. Shao Z, Jin G, Ji W, et al. The role of fast-track surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 635 consecutive resections. Int J Surg. 2015;15:129-133.
32. Yamaki S, Satoi S, Toyokawa H, et al. The clinical role of critical pathway implementation for pancreaticoduodenectomy in 179 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:271-278.
33. Kennedy EP, Grenda TR, Sauter PK, et al. Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:938-944.
34. Sutcliffe RP, Hamoui M, Isaac J, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with low drain fluid amylase. World J Surg. 2015;39: 2023-2030.
35. Morales Soriano R, Esteve Perez N, Tejada Gavela S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: can we improve the results after pancreatoduodenectomy? Cir Esp. 2015;93:509-515.
36. Williamsson C, Karlsson N, Sturesson C, et al. Impact of a fast-track surgery programme for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1133-1141.
37. Whipple AO. The rationale of radical surgery for cancer of the pancreas and ampullary region. Ann Surg. 1941;114:612-615.
38. de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg. 2012;99:404-410.
39. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel graDing system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931-937; discussion 937-939.
40. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000;232:786-795.
41. Kagedan DJ, Ahmed M, Devitt KS, et al. Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB. 2015;17:11-16.
42. Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, et al. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221:43-49.
43. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD007635.
44. Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, et al. Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery. Ann Surg. 2003;238:161-167.
45. Dy SM, Garg P, Nyberg D, et al. Critical pathway effectiveness: assessing the impact of patient, hospital care, and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:499-516.
46. Group EC. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg. 2015;261:1153-1159.