Improving outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Experiences with implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

Digestive Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 177-184

  Coolsen, Marielle M E ^a   Van Dam, Ronald M ^a   Chigharoe, Arwind ^a   Damink, Steven W M Olde ^a,b   Dejong, Cornelis H C ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Enhanced recovery; Fast track; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Perioperative care

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; OPERATIVE TIME; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84906000625     PISSN: 02534886     EISSN: 14219883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000363583     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR: Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 1935; 102: 763-779.
2. De Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, De Jong CH, et al: Impact of nationwidecentralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. British J Surg 2012; 99: 404-410.
3. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, et al: Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 786- 795.
4. Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C: Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 391-398.
5. Kehlet H: Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 606-617.
6. Barbieri A, Van Haecht K, VanHerck P, Sermeus W, Faggiano F, Marchisio S, et al: Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: A meta-analysis. BMC Med 2009; 7: 32.
7. Arsalani-Zadeh R, El-Fadl D, Yassin N, MacFie J: Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 181-196.
8. Podore PC, Throop EB: Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: A report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29: 787-792.
9. Brustia P, Renghi A, Gramaglia L, Porta C, Cassatella R, De Angelis R, et al: Mininvasive abdominal aortic surgery. Early recovery and reduced hospitalization after multidisciplinary approach. J Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 44: 629-635.
10. McCarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP, Fisher TL, Kuhn JA: Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surgy 2005; 242: 494-498; discussion 498-501.
11. Wasowicz-Kemps DK, Bliemer B, Boom FA, de Zwaan NM, van Ramshorst B: Laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: outpatient procedure versus overnight stay. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1233-1237.
12. Kirsh EJ, Worwag EM, Sinner M, Chodak GW: Using outcome data and patient satisfaction surveys to develop policies regarding minimum length of hospitalization after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 56: 101-106; discussion 106-107.
13. Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K, Dejong CH: Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1909-1918.
14. Di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, et al: A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: A prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 345-351.
15. Nygren J, Hausel J, Kehlet H, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Dejong C, et al: A comparison in five European centres of case mix, clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 455- 461.
16. Van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, et al: Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 969-975.
17. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schafer M, et al: Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 817-830.
18. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 97-132; quiz 133-134; discussion 196.
19. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13.
20. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al: Delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007; 142: 761-768.
21. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al: 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 530-538.
22. Welsch T, Eisele H, Zschabitz S, Hinz U, Buchler MW, Wente MN: Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 783-791.
23. Maher JW, Bakhos W, Nahmias N, Wolfe LG, Meador JG, Baugh N, et al: Drain amylase levels are an adjunct in detection of gastrojejunostomy leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 881-884; discussion 885-886.
24. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213.
25. Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C: Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 391-398.
26. Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, Rosenberg LM, Doria C, Marino IR, et al: Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution - The first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 917-923; discussion 923- 914.
27. Porter GA, Pisters PW, Mansyur C, Bisanz A, Reyna K, Stanford P, et al: Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 484-489.
28. Vanounou T, Pratt W, Fischer JE, Vollmer CM Jr, Callery MP: Deviation-based cost modeling: A novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 570-579.
29. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V: Fast-track recovery programme after pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1387-1393.
30. Robertson N, Gallacher PJ, Peel N, Garden OJ, Duxbury M, Lassen K, et al: Implementation of an enhanced recovery programme following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2012; 14: 700-708.
31. Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Kazemier G, Hop WC, Greve JW, et al: Pyloruspreserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: A prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 738-745.
32. Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM, Winkens B, Teeuwen JH, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al: Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1082-1093.
33. Brooks AD, Marcus SG, Gradek C, Newman E, Shamamian P, Gouge TH, et al: Decreasing length of stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 823-830.
34. Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M, Kallam R, MacFie J: Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 754-758.
35. Nikfarjam M, Weinberg L, Low N, Fink MA, Muralidharan V, Houli N, et al: A fast-track recovery program significantly reduces hospital length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP 2013; 14: 63-70.
36. Riall TS: What is the effect of age on pancreatic resection? Adv Surg 2009; 43: 233-249.
37. Gooiker GA, van der Geest LG, Wouters MW, Vonk M, Karsten TM, Tollenaar RA, et al: Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1821- 1829.
38. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V: Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 357-362.
39. Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F: Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwidehospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1377- 1381.