Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: A systematic review of the evidence

HPB

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 11-16

  Kagedan, Daniel J ^a   Ahmed, Mahrosh ^b   Devitt, Katharine S ^b   Wei, Alice C ^b,c  

^a Division of General Surgery   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONVALESCENCE; ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MOBILIZATION; MORBIDITY; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS SURGERY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADVERSE EFFECTS; MORTALITY; PANCREATIC DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84916200241     PISSN: 1365182X     EISSN: 14772574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12265     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Siquini W,. (2009) Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Diseases. Milan: Springer, pp. 1-2.
2. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher K,. (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244: 10-15.
3. Glass CC, Gondek SP, Vollmer CM, Callery MP, Kent TS,. (2013) Readmission following pancreatectomy: what can be improved? HPB 15: 703-708.
4. Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, Sutradhar R, Baxter N, To T, et al. (2010) Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian provinces. Ann Surg Oncol 17: 2537-2544.
5. Torre ML, Nigri G, Ferrari L, Cosenza G, Ravaioli M, Ramacciato G,. (2012) Hospital volume, margin status, and longterm survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 78: 225-229.
6. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A,. (2012) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 10-29.
7. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW,. (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183: 630-641.
8. Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K, Dejong CH,. (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg 37: 1909-1918.
9. Ronellenfitsch U, Rössner E, Jakob J, Post S, Hohenberger P, Schwarzbach M,. (2008) Clinical pathways in surgery-should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393: 449-457.
10. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64: 401-406.
11. Porter GA, Pisters PWT, Mansyur C, Bisanz A, Reyna K, Stanford P, et al. (2000) Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 7: 484-489.
12. Vanounou T, Pratt W, Fischer JE, Vollmer JCM, Callery MP,. (2007) Deviation-based cost modelling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg 204: 570-579.
13. Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, Rosenberg LM, Doria C, Marino IR, et al. (2007) Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution-the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 204: 917-923.
14. Berberat P, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, Kleeff J, Müller M, Gutt C, et al. (2007) Fast track-different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11: 880-887.
15. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V,. (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95: 1387-1393.
16. Kennedy E, Grenda T, Sauter P, Rosato E, Chojnacki K, Rosato JF, et al. (2009) Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg 13: 938-944.
17. di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano M, Andriulli A, et al. (2010) A modified fast-track programme for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-centre experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396: 345-351.
18. Robertson N, Gallacher PJ, Peel N, Garden OJ, Duxbury M, Lassen K, et al. (2012) Implementation of an enhanced recovery programme following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 14: 700-708.
19. Nikfarjam M, Weinberg L, Low N, Fink MA, Muralidharan V, Houli N, et al. (2013) A fast track recovery programme significantly reduces hospital length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP 14: 63-70.
20. Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Badran A, Alsaati H, Clarke H, Fecher I, et al. (2013) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme after pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-centre UK pilot study. Pancreatology 13: 58-62.
21. Olsén MF, Wennberg E,. (2011) Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery: a review. World J Surg 35: 2586-2593.
22. Spelt L, Ansari D, Sturesson C, Tingstedt B, Andersson R,. (2011) Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand? HPB 13: 833-838.
23. Ypsilantis E, Praseedom RK,. (2009) Current status of fast-track recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery. JOP 10: 646-650.
24. Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G,. (2012) Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94: 318-326.
25. Kehlet H,. (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78: 606-617.
26. Lemmens L, van Zelm R, Borel Rinkes I, van Hillegersberg R, Kerkkamp H,. (2009) Clinical and organizational content of clinical pathways for digestive surgery: a systematic review. Dig Surg 26: 91-99.
27. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schäfer M, et al. (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31: 817-830.
28. Mehta VV, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, Kooby DA,. (2013) Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 216: 635-642.
29. Conlon K, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jarnagin W, Coit DG, et al. (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg Oncol 234: 487-493.
30. Van Buren G, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, Winter J, Behrman SW, Zyromski NJ, et al. (2014) A randomized prospective multicentre trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 259: 605-612.
31. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. (2012) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6): CD000259.
32. Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen J, Winkens B, Teeuwen JH, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery programme in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg 37: 1082-1093.