Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1909-1918

  Coolsen, M M E ^a   Van Dam, R M ^a   Van Der Wilt, A A ^a   Slim, K ^b   Lassen, K ^c,d,e   Dejong, C H C ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^e ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; REVIEW;

HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84880784830     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2044-3     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78(5):606-617
2. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630-641
3. Barbieri A, et al. (2009) Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis. BMC Med 7:32
4. Arsalani-Zadeh R, et al. (2011) Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 98(2):181-196
5. Podore PC, Throop EB (1999) Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: a report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 29(5):787-792
6. Brustia P, et al. (2003) Mini-invasive abdominal aortic surgery. Early recovery and reduced hospitalization after multidisciplinary approach. J Cardiovasc Surg 44(5):629-635
7. Wasowicz-Kemps DK, et al. (2006) Laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: outpatient procedure versus overnight stay. Surg Endosc 20(8):1233-1237
8. McCarty TM, et al. (2005) Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg 242(4):494-498 discussion 498-501
9. Kirsh EJ, et al. (2000) Using outcome data and patient satisfaction surveys to develop policies regarding minimum length of hospitalization after radical prostatectomy. Urology 56(1):101-106 discussion 106-107
10. DeOliveira ML, et al. (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244(6):931-939
11. Wilde RF, et al. (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404-410
12. Gouma DJ, et al. (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232(6):786-795
13. Yeo CJ, et al. (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226(3):248-257 discussion 257-260
14. Richter A, et al. (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27(3):324-329. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6659-z
15. Varadhan KK, et al. (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434-440
16. Wind J, et al. (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800-809
17. Wente MN, et al. (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761-768
18. Bassi C, et al. (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8-13
19. Slim K, et al. (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712-716
20. Stroup DF, et al. (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283(15):2008-2012
21. Freemantle N (2000) StatsDirect - statistical software for medical research in the 21st century. BMJ 321(16):1536
22. Egger M (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 13(315):629-634
23. Chaudhary A, Parvez A, Singh AP (2008) Early discharge after pancreaticoduodenectomy - fair or foul? Conference: 39th annual meeting of the American pancreatic association Chicago, IL. November 7-8, 2008. Pancreas 37(4):464
24. Wichmann MW, et al. (2006) A prospective clinical feasibility study for multimodal "fast track" rehabilitation in elective pancreatic cancer surgery. Rozhl Chir 85(4):169-175
25. Bruns C, Wichmann MW, et al. (2007) Fast track pancreatic cancer surgery. Chirurgische Praxis 67(2):203-210 [in German]
26. Vanounou T, et al. (2007) Deviation-based cost modeling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):570-579
27. Vollmer CM Jr, et al. (2007) Quality assessment in high-acuity surgery: volume and mortality are not enough. Arch Surg 142(4):371-380
28. Balcom JH, et al. (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136(4):391-398
29. French JJ, et al. (2009) Fast-track management of patients undergoing proximal pancreatic resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(3):201-204
30. Kow AW, et al. (2008) Striving for a better operative outcome: 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies. HPB (Oxford) 10(6):464-471
31. Pratt WB, et al. (2008) Epidural analgesia for pancreatoduodenectomy: a critical appraisal. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1207-1220
32. Fukase M, Shimamura H, Takeda K (2009) Introduction of the critical path for pancreaticoduodenectomy taking in the concept of probiotics. Conference: joint 40th anniversary meeting of American pancreatic association and Japan pancreas society Honolulu, HI United States. November 4-11, 2009. Pancreas 38(8):997
33. Little AB, Whipple TW (1996) Clinical pathway implementation in the acute care hospital setting. J Nurs Care Qual 11(2):54-61
34. Pratt WB, Vollmer CM, Callery MP (2009) Outcomes in pancreatic resection are negatively influenced by pre-operative hospitalization. HPB 11(1):57-65
35. Burden S, et al. (2010) Study protocol: preoperative nutrition in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008879.pub2
36. Ypsilantis E, et al. (2009) Current status of fast-track recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery. J Pancreas 10(6):646-650 [Electronic Resource]
37. Spelt L, et al. (2011) Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand? HPB 13(12):833-838
38. Hall TC, et al. (2012) Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(5):318-326
39. Balzano G, et al. (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95(11):1387-1393
40. Porter GA, et al. (2000) Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 7(7):484-489
41. Kennedy EP, et al. (2007) Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution-the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 204(5):917-923 discussion 923-924
42. Robertson N, et al. (2012) Implementation of an enhanced recovery programme following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 14(10):700-708
43. Kennedy EP, et al. (2009) Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg 13(5):938-944
44. di Sebastiano P, et al. (2011) A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(3):345-351
45. Berberat PO, et al. (2007) Fast track - different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11(7):880-887
46. Vlug MS, et al. (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868-875
47. Gillissen F, et al. (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1938-4
48. Bassi C, et al. (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242(6):767-771 discussion 771-773
49. Miedema BW, et al. (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg 127(8):945-949 discussion 949-950
50. Buchler MW, et al. (2000) Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 87(7):883-889
51. Buchler MW, et al. (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138(12):1310-1314 discussion 1315
52. Halloran CM, et al. (2002) Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg 19(2):138-146
53. Maessen J, et al. (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224-231
54. Ahmed J, et al. (2010) Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97:754-758
55. van den Broek MA, et al. (2011) Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery. Br J Surg. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7503
56. ®) society recommendations. World J Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.011