Risk management model of winter navigation operations

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Volumn 108, Issue 1-2, 2016, Pages 242-262

  Valdez Banda, Osiris A ^a   Goerlandt, Floris ^a   Kuzmin, Vladimir ^b   Kujala, Pentti ^a   Montewka, Jakub ^a,c,d  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b ADMIRAL MAKAROV STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARITIME AND INLAND SHIPPING   (Russian Federation)

^c FINNISH GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d GDYNIA MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Accidental oil spill; Bayesian networks; Formal Safety Assessment; Maritime risk management; Maritime safety; Winter navigation operations

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; OIL SPILLS; OIL TANKERS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

BAYESIAN NETWORK MODELS; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATIONS; MARITIME SAFETY; MARITIME TRAFFIC; OIL TANKER VESSELS; RISK MANAGEMENT MODELS; WINTER NAVIGATION;

MARINE POLLUTION;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; ICE COVER; MODELING; NAVIGATION; OIL SPILL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SHIP MOTION; WINTER;

OIL SPILL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; WINTER; BAYES THEOREM; FINLAND; HUMAN; ICE COVER; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; SEA; SEASON; SHIP; SWEDEN; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; GULF OF FINLAND;

BAYES THEOREM; FINLAND; HUMANS; ICE COVER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OCEANS AND SEAS; PETROLEUM POLLUTION; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEASONS; SHIPS; SWEDEN;

EID: 84969262300     PISSN: 0025326X     EISSN: 18793363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.071     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Afenyo M., Veitch B., Khan F. A state-of-the-art review of fate and transport of oil spills in open and ice-covered water. Ocean Eng. 2015, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.014.
2. Akyuz E. Quantification of human error probability towards the gas inerting process on-board crude oil tankers. Saf. Sci. 2015, 80:77-86. 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.018.
3. Aven T. On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2010, 95:623-631. 10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011.
4. Aven T. Some reflections on uncertainty analysis and management. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2010, 95:195-201. 10.1016/j.ress.2009.09.010.
5. Aven T. A risk concept applicable for both probabilistic and non-probabilistic perspectives. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49:1080-1086. 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.017.
6. Aven T., Heide B. Reliability and validity of risk analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94:1862-1868. 10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.003.
7. Brown A.J. Collision scenarios and probabilistic collision damage. Mar. Struct. Ship Collision Ground. 2002, 15:335-364. 10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00007-2.
8. Brunila O.-P., Storgård J. Oil Transportation in the Gulf of Finland 2012, Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku.
9. Dekker P.S. The Field Guide to Understanding "Human Error" 2014, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
10. Er Z. Definitions of human factor analysis for the maritime safety management process. Presented at the International Association of Maritime Universities (IAMU) 6th Annual General Assembly and Conference 2005.
11. Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) Actual Coloured Ice Charts of Finnish Maritime Areas 2014, Marine and Weather Services, (http://cdn.fmi.fi/marine-observations/products/ice-charts/latest-full-color-ice-chart.pdf).
12. Finnish Transport Agency (Liikennevirasto) Finnish Maritime Strategy (Suomen Meriliikennestrategia) 2014-2022 2014, FTA.
13. Finnish Transport Agency (Liikennevirasto) Finland's winter navigation. Vessel Traffic Services on Finnish Waters 2014.
14. Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) Finland's winter navigation. Maritime Safety Regulation 2010, (Trafi/31298/03.04.01.00/2010).
15. Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) Guidelines for the Application of the Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules 2011, (Trafi/21816/03.04.01.01/2011).
16. Flage R., Aven T. Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis (QRA). Reliab. Risk Anal. Theory Appl. 2009, 2:9-18.
17. Flage R., Aven T., Zio E., Baraldi P. Concerns, challenges, and directions of development for the issue of representing uncertainty in risk assessment. Risk Anal. 2014, 34:1196-1207. 10.1111/risa.12247.
18. Gholamreza E., Wolff M. Contradictions in the practices of training for and assessment of competency: a case study from the maritime domain. Educ. Train. 2008, 50:260-272. 10.1108/00400910810874026.
19. Goerlandt F., Kujala P. On the reliability and validity of ship-ship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk. Saf. Sci. 2014, 62:348-365. 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.010.
20. Goerlandt F., Montewka J. A probabilistic model for accidental cargo oil outflow from product tankers in a ship-ship collision. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 79:130-144. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.026.
21. Goerlandt F., Montewka J. A framework for risk analysis of maritime transportation systems: a case study for oil spill from tankers in a ship-ship collision. Saf. Sci. 2015, 76:42-66. 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.009.
22. Goerlandt F., Montewka J. Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2015, 138:115-134. 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.025.
23. Hänninen M. Bayesian networks for maritime traffic accident prevention: benefits and challenges. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2014, 73:305-312. 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.017.
24. Hänninen M., Kujala P. Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 102:27-40. 10.1016/j.ress.2012.02.008.
25. He X., Wang Y., Shen Z., Huang X. A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93:298-306. 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.026.
26. HELCOM Automatic Identification System (AIS) Data of the Traffic Operations in the Gulf of Finland during the Winters 2011 and 2012 2012.
27. Hodges J.S. Six (or so) things you can do with a bad model. Oper. Res. 1991, 39:355-365. 10.1287/opre.39.3.355.
28. Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) 1998, Elsevier.
29. Hollnagel E. FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems 2012, Ashgate.
30. Hollnagel P.E. Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management 2014, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
31. International Maritime Organization (IMO) Amendments to the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making progress. MSC/Circ.1023-MEPC/Circ.392. 25 August 2005, London, UK 2005.
32. International Maritime Organizations (IMO) Manual on Oil Spill Risk Evaluation and Assessment of Response Preparedness 2010, IMO Publishing, London, UK.
33. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Risk Management ISO 31000 - Principle and Guidelines 2009, (ISO/TC 262, ICS:03.100.01). 1 ed.
34. Jalonen R., Riska K., Hänninen S. A Preliminary Risk Analysis of Winter Navigation in the Baltic Sea. Research Report No. 57 2005, Winter Navigation Research Board.
35. Klanac A., Varsta P. Design of marine structures with improved safety for environment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 75-90. (Special Issue on Safecomp 2008 96). 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.016.
36. Kloprogge P., van der Sluijs J.P., Petersen A.C. A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26:289-301. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.009.
37. Kujala P., Hänninen M., Arola T., Ylitalo J. Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94:1349-1357. 10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.028.
38. Kuronen J., Helminen R., Lehikoinen A., Tapaninen U. Maritime Transportation in the Gulf of Finland in 2007 and in 2015 2009, Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies University of Turku A45/2008, (2008, http://urn.fi/URN: ISBN: 978-951-29-3771-4).
39. Lappalainen F.J., Kuronen J., Tapaninen U. Evaluation of the ISM code in the Finnish shipping companies. J. Marit. Res. 2014, 9:23-32.
40. Lee M., Jung J.-Y. Pollution risk assessment of oil spill accidents in Garorim Bay of Korea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 100:297-303. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.08.037.
41. Lehikoinen A., Luoma E., Mäntyniemi S., Kuikka S. Optimizing the recovery efficiency of Finnish oil combating vessels in the Gulf of Finland using Bayesian networks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:1792-1799. 10.1021/es303634f.
42. Lehikoinen A., Hänninen M., Storgård J., Luoma E., Mäntyniemi S., Kuikka S. A Bayesian network for assessing the collision induced risk of an oil accident in the Gulf of Finland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 10.1021/es501777g.
43. Leiger R., Aps R., Fetissov M., Herkul K., Kopti M., Kotta J., Mander U., Suursaar U. Oil accident response simulation: allocation of potential places of refuge. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2009, vol. 126. WIT Press, (2009). 10.2495/CP090221.
44. Leveson N. Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety 2011, MIT Press.
45. Martins M.R., Maturana M.C. Application of Bayesian belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 110:89-109. 10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.008.
46. McAllister A., Rekart C., Michel K. Evaluation of accidental oil spill from bunker tanks (phase I). Technical Report SSC-424 2003, Ship Structure Commite, USA.
47. Montewka J. Predicting risk of collision for oil tankers in the Gulf of Finland. J. Konbin 2009, 11-12:17-32.
48. Montewka J., Krata P., Goerlandt F., Mazaheri A., Kujala P. Marine traffic risk modelling - an innovative approach and a case study. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O J. Risk Reliab. 2011, 225:307-322. 10.1177/1748006X11399988.
49. Montewka J., Ehlers S., Goerlandt F., Hinz T., Tabri K., Kujala P. A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems-a case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2014, 124:142-157. 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.014.
50. Mullai A., Paulsson U. A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43:1590-1603. 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.022.
51. Nelis S., Tabri K., Kujala P. Interaction of Ice Force in Ship-Ship Collision V003T02A006 2015, 10.1115/OMAE2015-41351.
52. Oltedal H., Wadsworth E. Risk perception in the Norwegian shipping industry and identification of influencing factors. Marit. Policy Amplif. Manag. 2010, 37:601-623. 10.1080/03088839.2010.514954.
53. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference 2014, Morgan Kaufmann.
54. Ploskonka H. Ice breaker operations in the Gulf of Finland, Winter 2011. WInOIl Project Report 2013, Aalto university, department of Applied Mechanics, Espoo, Finland, (November 2013).
55. Psaraftis H.N. Formal safety assessment: an updated review. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2012, 17:390-402. 10.1007/s00773-012-0175-0.
56. Qu X., Meng Q., Suyi L. Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43:2030-2036. 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.022.
57. Riska K., Izumiyama K., Uto S., Kubat I., Frederking R., Liljeström G., Rosenblad M., Kirs C., Kouts T., Wang K., Leppäranta M. Increasing the Safety of Icebound Shipping, Final Scientific Report, 1 2007, Helsinki University of Technology, Ship Laboratory, Espoo, Finland.
58. Rosenblad M. Increasing the Safety of Icebound Shipping, Final Scientific Report: Volume 1, Helsinki University of Technology, Ship Laboratory, Espoo, Finland. WP4 2007, Operative Environment (Icebreaker Operations).
59. Ruud S., Mikkelsen Å. Risk-based rules for crane safety systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. Saf. Marit.Transport. 2008, 93:1369-1376. 10.1016/j.ress.2007.08.004.
60. Singh A., Asmath H., Chee C.L., Darsan J. Potential oil spill risk from shipping and the implications for management in the Caribbean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 93:217-227. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.013.
61. Smailys V., Česnauskis M. Estimation of expected cargo oil outflow from tanker involved in casualty. Transport 2006, 21:293-300. 10.1080/16484142.2006.9638083.
62. Sormunen O.-V.E., Goerlandt F., Häkkinen J., Posti A., Hänninen M., Montewka J., Ståhlberg K., Kujala P. Uncertainty in maritime risk analysis: extended case study on chemical tanker collisions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2014, (1475090213515640). 10.1177/1475090213515640.
63. Ståhlberg K., Goerlandt F., Ehlers S., Kujala P. Impact scenario models for probabilistic risk-based design for ship-ship collision. Mar. Struct. 2013, 33:238-264. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.06.006.
64. Trochim W.M.K., Donnelly J.P. Research Methods Knowledge Base 2008, Atomic Dog/Cengage Learning.
65. Valdez Banda O.A., Jalonen R., Goerlandt F., Montewka J., Kujala P. Hazard Identification in Winter Navigation 2014, Aalto University publication series, (Science + Technology 15/2014 ISBN 978-952-60- 5888-7).
66. Valdez Banda O.A., Goerlandt F., Montewka J., Kujala P. A risk analysis of winter navigation in Finnish sea areas. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2015, 79:100-116. 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.024.
67. Valdez Banda O.A., Goerlandt F., Kujala P., Montewka J. Expert elicitation of risk control options to reduce human error in winter navigation. European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2015) 2015, Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems, Taylor & Francis Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
68. Watson S.R. The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1994, 45:261-269. 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90142-2.
69. Zhang J., Zhang D., Yan X., Haugen S., Guedes Soares C. A distributed anti-collision decision support formulation in multi-ship encounter situations under COLREGs. Ocean Eng. 2015, 105:336-348. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.054.