Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 162-198

  Lew, Kristen ^a   Fukawa Connelly, Timothy Patrick ^b   Mejía Ramos, Juan Pablo ^a   Weber, Keith ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Lecture; Undergraduate mathematics education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969217625     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0162     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Alcock, L. (2010). Mathematicians' perspectives on the teaching and learning of proof. In F. Hitt, D. Holton, & P. Thompson (Eds.), CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education series: Vol. 16. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education VII (pp. 63-92). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
2. Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbavun.
3. Boero, P. (2007). Theorems in schools: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
4. Davies, P. (1995). Introduction. In R. Feynman with R. B. Leighton and M. Sands, Six easy pieces (pp. ix-xviii). New York, NY: Basic Books.
5. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
6. Dennis, D., & Confrey, J. (1996). The creation of continuous exponents: A study of the method and epistemology of John Wallis. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education series: Vol. 6. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II(pp. 33-60). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
7. de Villiers, M. D. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17-24.
8. Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 25-41). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139013499.008
9. Duval, R. (2007). Cognitive functioning and the understanding mathematical processes of proof. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in schools: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 137-161). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
10. Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 522-532. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.522
11. Feynman, R., Leighton, R. B, & Sands, M. (2012). The Feynman lectures on physics. (5th ed.). Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.
12. Firestone, W. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16-23. doi:10.3l02/00l3l89X022004016
13. Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2012). A case study of one instructor's lecture-based teaching of proof in abstract algebra: Making sense of her pedagogical moves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Mathematics, athematics, , 81(3), 325-345. doi:10.1007/sl0649-012-9407-9
14. Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2014). Toulmin analysis: A tool for analyzing teaching and predicting student performance in proof-based classes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(1), 75-88. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.790509
15. Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Newton, C. (in press). Evaluating mathematical quality of instruction in advanced mathematics courses by examining the enacted example space. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
16. Goodstein, D., & Neugebauer, G. (1995). Special preface. In R. Feynman (with R. B. Leighton and M. Sands), Six easy pieces (pp. xix-xxii). New York, NY: Basic Books.
17. Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6-13. doi:10.1007/ BF01809605
18. Hanna, G., & Barbeau, E. (2008). Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge. ZDM, 40(3), 345-353. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0080-5
19. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2009). College instructors' views of students vis-à-vis proof. In M. Blan- ton, D. Stylianou, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching proof across the grades: A K-l2 perspective (pp. 275-289). New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(A), 389-399. doi:10.1007/BF01273372
21. Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(A), 358-390. doi:10.595l/jresemathed- uc.43.4.0358
22. Johnson, E. (2013). Teachers' mathematical activity in inquiry-oriented instruction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 761-775. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.002
23. Johnson, E., Caughman, J., Fredericks, J., & Gibson, L. (2013). Implementing inquiry-oriented curriculum: From the mathematicians' perspective. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 743-760. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.003
24. Johnstone, A. H., & Su, W. Y. (1994). Lectures-A learning experience? Education in Chemistry, 31, 75-76, 79.
25. Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23-32. doi:10.l207/s15326985ep200l-4
26. Kiewra, K. A. (1987). Notetaking and review: The research and its implications. Instructional Science, 16(3), 233-249. doi:10.1007/BF00l20252
27. Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 71-80. doi:10.l207/sl543042ltip4102-3
28. Kline, M. (1977). Why the professor can't teach: Mathematics and the dilemma of university education. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
29. Lai, Y, & Weber, K. (2014). Factors mathematicians profess to consider when presenting pedagogical proofs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(I), 93-108. doi:10.1007/sl0649-013-9497-z
30. Lai, Y, Weber, K., & Mejfa-Ramos, J. P. (2012). Mathematicians' perspectives on features of a good pedagogical proof. Cognition & Instruction, 30(2), 146-169. doi:10.1080/07370008.201 2.661814
31. Leron, U. (1983). Structuring mathematical proofs. American Mathematical Monthly, 90(3), 174-185. doi:10.2307/2975544
32. Leron, U., & Dubinsky, E. (1995). An abstract algebra story. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(3), 227-242. doi:10.2307/2975010 Mathematica (Version 9.0) [Computer software]. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Research.
33. Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and proving in mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 88-93). Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.
34. Mejfa-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2014). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: Further evidence from a survey study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 161-173. doi:10.1007/ sl0649-013-9514-2
35. Mills, M. (2012). Investigating the teaching practices of professors when presenting proofs: The use of examples. In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 512-516). Portland, OR.
36. Nardi, E. (2008). Amongst mathematicians. New York, NY: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-0-387- 37143-6
37. Oehrtman, M. (2009). Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(4), 396-426. http://www. jstor.org/stable/40539345
38. Raman, M. (2003). Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people viewproof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 319-325. doi:10.l023/A:l024360204239
39. Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 7(1), 5-41. doi:10.1093/ philmat/7.1.5
40. Rosenthal, J. S. (1995). Active learning strategies in advanced mathematics classes. Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 223-228. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381723
41. Rowland, T. (2002). Generic proofs in number theory. In S. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 157-184). Westport, CT: Ablex.
42. Selden A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4-36. doi:10.2307/30034698
43. Speer, N. M., Smith, J. P., III, & Horvath, A. (2010). Collegiate mathematics teaching: An un- examined practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2-29), 99-114. doi:10.10l6/j. jmathb.2010.02.001
44. Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1991). Benefits of notetaking: Implications for secondary and postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 14(1), 7-18. doi:10.2307/1510370
45. Thurston, W. P. (1994). On proof and progress in mathematics, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 50(2), 161-177. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1994-00502-6
46. Weber, K. (2002). Beyond proving and explaining: Proofs that justify the use of definitions and axiomatic structures and proofs that illustrate technique. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(3), 14-17. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.lib.ilstu.edu/stable/40248396
47. Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: A case study of one professor's lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 115-133. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.03.001
48. Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(A), 431-459. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539306
49. Weber, K. (2010). Proofs that develop insight. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), 32-36. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.lib.ilstu.edu/stable/20749436
50. Weber, K. (2012). Mathematicians' perspectives on their pedagogical practice with respect to proof. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 43(4), 463-482.doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.622803
51. Weber, K. (with Hanna, G., Harel, G., Kidron, I., Selden, A., & Selden, J.). (2014). Reflections on justification and proof. In M. N. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics & mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 237-260). New York, NY: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5-14
52. Weber, K. (in press). Effective proof reading strategies for comprehending mathematical proofs, International Journal for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, doi:10.1007/ s40753-015-0011-0
53. Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2011). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 329-344. doi:10.1007/sl0649-010-9292-z
54. Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2014). Mathematics majors' beliefs about proof reading. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 45(1), 89-103. doi:10.1 080/0020739X.2013.790514
55. Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173-199. doi:10.1353/jge.2003.0006
56. Wong, L. (2014). Essential study skills (8th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
57. Wu, H. (1999). The joy of lecturing-With a critique of the romantic tradition of education writing. In S. G. Krantz (Ed.), How to teach mathematics (2nd ed., pp. 261-271). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
58. Yopp, D. (2011). How some research mathematicians and statisticians use proof in undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 115-130. doi:10.10l6/j.jmathb.2011.01.002