Student perceptions of learning data-creation and data-analysis skills in an introductory college-level chemistry course

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 338-345

  Glazer, Nirit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84968906491     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c4rp00219a     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anaya G., (1999a), Accuracy of Self-Reported Test Scores, College and University, 75 (2), 13-19
2. Anaya G., (1999b), College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades, Res. High. Educ., 40 (5), 499-526
3. Bandura A., (1977), Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychol. Rev., 84, 191-215
4. Berger C., Kerner N. and Lee Y., (1999), Understanding student perceptions of collaboration, laboratory and inquiry use in introductory chemistry, National Association for Research in Science Teaching
5. Bowen G. and Roth W., (2005), Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 42 (10), 1063-1088
6. Boyer E., (1998), The Boyer commission on educating undergraduates in the research university. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America ' s Research Universities, Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
7. Bruck L. B. and Towns M. H., (2009), Preparing Students to Benefit from Inquiry-Based Activities in the Chemistry Laboratory: Guidelines and Suggestions, J. Chem. Educ., 86 (7), 820-822
8. Crawford B. A., (2014), From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom, in Lederman N. G. and Abell S. K. (ed.), Handbook of research in science education, vol. 2, Routledge, pp. 515-544
9. Felder R. and Brent R., (1996), Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction, College Teaching, 44 (2), 43-47
10. Francisco J., Nicoll G. and Trautmann M., (1998), Integrating multiple teaching methods into a general chemistry classroom, J. Chem. Educ., 75 (2), 210
11. Fraser B., (1994), Research on classroom and school climate, Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, pp. 493-541
12. Fraser B., (1998), Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants, International Handbook of Science Education, 1, 527-561
13. Glazer N., (2011), Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature, Studies in Science Education, 47 (2), 183-210
14. Gonyea R. M., (2005), Self-reported data in institutional research: review and recommendations, New Directions for Institutional Research, 127, 73
15. Hofstein A. and Lunetta V., (2004), The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century, Sci. Educ., 88 (1), 28-54
16. Kerner N., Black B., Monson E. and Meeuwenberg L., (2002), Training Instructors to Facilitate Collaborative Inquiry, Journal of Student Centered Learning, 1 (1), 29-36
17. Kovac J., (1999), Student active learning methods in general chemistry, J. Chem. Educ., 76 (1), 120
18. Krajcik J., Blumenfeld P., Marx R., Bass K., Fredricks J. and Soloway E., (1998), Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: initial attempts by middle school students, J Learn. Sci., 7 (3), 313-350
19. Linnenbrink E. and Pintrich P., (2003), The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom, Read. Writ. Q., 19 (2), 119-137
20. Lloyd B. and Spencer J., (1994), The Forum: New Directions for General Chemistry: Recommendations of the Task Force on the General Chemistry Curriculum, J. Chem. Educ., 71 (3), 206
21. Lunetta V., (1998), The school science laboratory: historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching, International Handbook of Science Education, 1, 249-264
22. Mckeachie W. J., (2002), Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 11th edn
23. Michael J. and Modell H., (2003), Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: A working model for helping the learner to learn, Lawrence Erlbaum
24. National Research Council, (1996), National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press
25. National Research Council, (2001), in Pellegrino J. W., Chudowsky N. and Glaser R. (ed.), Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment, Washington, DC: National Academies Press
26. National Research Council, (2012), in Quinn H., Schweingruber H. and Keller T. (ed.), A framework for K-12 science education practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
27. Oliver-Hoyo M., Allen D., Hunt W., Hutson J. and Pitts A., (2004), Effects of an active learning environment: teaching innovations at a research I institution, J. Chem. Educ., 81 (3), 441
28. Olson S. and Loucks-Horsley S., (2000), Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning, National Academies Press
29. Pascarella E., (2001), Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: a cautionary tale, J. Coll. Student Dev., 42 (5), 488-492
30. Pike G. R., (1995), The relationships between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores, Res. High. Educ., 36, 1-22
31. Pike G. R., (1996), Limitations of using students' self-reports of academic development as proxies for traditional achievement measures, Res. High. Educ., 37, 89-114
32. Razavi T., (2001), Self-report measures: an overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 23 pp. (Discussion Papers in Accounting and Management Science, (01-175), Retrieved February 24, 2015 from: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/35712/)
33. Roth W. and McGinn M., (1997), Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice? Sci. Educ., 81 (1), 91-106
34. Siebert E. and McIntosh W., (2001), College pathways to the science education standards, Natl Science Teachers Assn
35. Slunt K. M. and Giancarlo L. C., (2004), Student-Centered Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Methods of Instruction, J. Chem. Educ., 81 (7), 985-988
36. Steele C., (1997), A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance, Am. Psychol., 52 (6), 613-629
37. Steele C. and Aronson J., (1995), Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 69 (5), 797-811
38. Tobin K., (1990), Research on science laboratory activities: in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning, Sch. Sci. Math., 90 (5), 403-418
39. Volkwein J. F. and Yin A. C., (2010), Measurement issues in assessment, New Directions for Institutional Research, pp. 141-154, 10.1002/ir.336
40. Xu J., (2003), The reform of teaching in General Chemistry: establishing student-centered teaching strategies, The China Papers, 15-19
41. Yuretich R., (2003), Encouraging Critical Thinking: Measuring Skills in Large Introductory Science Classes, J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 33 (3), 6
42. Zoller U., (1999), Scaling-up of higher-order cognitive skills-oriented college chemistry teaching: An action-oriented research, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 36 (5), 583-596
43. Zusho A., Pintrich P. and Coppola B., (2003), Skill and will: the role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 25 (9), 1081-1094