Thoughts on knowledge about thinking about knowledge

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 479-492

  Sinatra, Gale M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967616426     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84-94.
2. Barzilai, S. & Zohar, A. (2016/this volume). Epistemic (meta)cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 409-424). New York: Routledge.
3. Bendixen, L. D. & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 69-80.
4. Chen, J. A. & Barger, M. M. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition and motivation. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 425-438). New York: Routledge.
5. Chinn, C. A. & Buckland, L. A. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and in epistemic practices. In K. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. K. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Modelbased instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and in epistemic practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Chinn, C. A. & Rinehart, R. W. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition and philosophy: Developing a new framework for epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 460-478). New York: Routledge.
7. Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Gobert, J., Baker, R., & Wixon, M. (2015). Operationalizing and detecting disengagement within online science microworlds. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 43-57.
9. Graesser, A. (2015). Editorial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 3.
10. Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142-160. doi: 10.1080/00461520802178458.
11. Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students' self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245-257. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515932.
12. Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2014). Modeling and measuring epistemic cognition: A qualitative re-investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 12-28.
13. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In Hofer, B. & Pintrich, P R. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Hofer, B. K. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advancements and challenges. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 19-38). New York: Routledge.
15. Hofer, B. K. & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 113-120.
16. Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Beker, K. (2016/this volume). Argumentative reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 39-53). New York: Routledge.
17. Kelly, G. (2016/this volume). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.). Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 393-408). New York: Routledge.
18. Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 470-496.
19. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-328. doi: 10.1016/s0885-2014(00)00030-7.
20. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498.
21. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
22. Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50-62. doi: 10.1016/j .learninstruc.2013.03.001.
23. Mason, L. (2016/this volume). Psychological perspectives on measuring epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 375-392). New York: Routledge.
24. Moshman, D. & Tarricone, P. (2016/this volume). Logical and causal reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 54-67). New York: Routledge.
25. Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173-190.
26. Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 177-208.
27. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Hearle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3-54. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6.
28. Muis, K. R. & Duffy, M. C. (2012). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213-225. doi: 10.1037/a0029690.
29. Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Epistemic emotions mediate relations between epistemic beliefs, learning strategies and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003.
30. Murphy, P. K. & Alexander, P. A. (2016/this volume). Interrogating the relation between conceptual change and epistemic beliefs. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 439-459). New York: Routledge.
31. Pekrun, R. & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. (pp. 3-31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
33. Renninger, R. A. & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84-91. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069.
34. Ryu, S. & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 70-83.
35. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
36. Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The "warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107-115.
37. Sinatra, G. M., Broughton, S. H., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Emotions in science education. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 415-436). New York: Routlege.
38. Sinatra, G. M. & Chinn, C. A. (2011). Thinking and reasoning in science: Promoting epistemic conceptual change. In K. Harris, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Critical theories and models of learning and development relevant to learning and teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 257-282). Washington, DC: APA Publisher.
39. Sinatra, G. M., Kardash, C. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2012). Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instructional Science, 40(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9166-5.
40. Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and concpetual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123-138. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.916216.
41. Sinatra, G. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
42. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students'understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510-528.
43. Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision making and rationality in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (p. 783). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.