Interacting epistemic systems within and beyond the classroom

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 265-278

  Greene, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967484752     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518-542.
2. American Statistical Association (February, 2015). ASA comment on a journal's ban on null hypothesis statistical testing. Retrieved from http://community.amstat.org/blogs/ronald-wasserstein/2015/02/26/ asa-comment-on-a-journals-ban-on-null-hypothesis-statistical-testing.
3. Barzilai, S. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86-103.
4. Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, O. (2014). Incremental theories of intelligence predict multiple document comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 11-20.
5. Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48-70.
6. Bricker, L. A. & Bell, P. (2016/this volume). Exploring images of epistemic cognition across contexts and over time. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 197-214). New York: Routledge.
7. Bromme, R. & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public's bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59-69.
8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415-449.
10. Buehl, M. M. & Fives, H. (2016/this volume). The role of epistemic cognition in teacher learning and praxis. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 247-264). New York: Routledge.
11. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.
12. Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425-453). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
13. Clément, F. (2016/this volume). Social cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 86-99). New York: Routledge.
14. Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2016/this volume). Mathematical epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 147-164). New York: Routledge.
15. Elby, A., Macrander, C., & Hammer, D. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in science. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 113-127). New York: Routledge.
16. Feucht, F. C. (2010). Epistemic climate in elementary classrooms. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 55-93). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Goldman, A. I. (Summer, 2010). Social epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/ epistemology-social/.
19. Goldman, A. I. (2011). A guide to social epistemology. In A. I. Goldman & D. Whitcomb (Eds.), Social epistemology: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K. W., Braasch, J., McLeod, S., & Manning, F. (2010). Literacy in the digital world: Comprehending and learning from multiple sources. In M. G. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 257-284). New York: Guilford.
21. Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 2-7.
22. Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142-160.
23. Greene, J. A. & Yu, S. B. (2014). Modeling and measuring epistemic cognition: A qualitative re-investigation.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 12-28.
24. Greene, J. A., Yu, S., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55-69.
25. Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, L., Pazderka-Robinsons, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! One, two, three-Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 841-850.
26. Hofer, B. K. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advances and challenges. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 19-38). New York: Routledge.
27. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning, Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
28. Iordanou, K., Kendeou P., & Beker, K. (2016/this volume). Argumentative reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.). Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 39-53). New York: Routledge.
29. Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
31. Lee, C. D., Goldman, S. R., Levine, S., & Magliano, J. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in literary reasoning.In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 165-183). New York: Routledge.
32. Moshman, D. & Tarricone, P. (2016/this volume). Logical and causal reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.). Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 54-67). New York: Routledge.
33. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L.D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework.Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3-54.
34. Muis, K. R. & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 213-225.
35. Murphy, P. K. & Alexander, P. A. (2016/this volume). Interrogating the relation between conceptual change and epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 439-459). New York: Routledge.
36. Murphy, P. K., Alexander, P. A., Greene, J. A., & Edwards, M. N. (2007). Epistemological threads in the fabric of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction.(pp. 105-122). New York: Elsevier Press.
37. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
38. NGSS Lead States 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
39. Osborne, J. F., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the 'Expert' community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
40. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
41. Pekrun, R. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). New York: Springer.
42. Perry, W. G. Jr. (1968). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
43. Porsch, T. & Bromme, R. (2011). Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices. Instructional Science, 39, 805-819.
44. Rorty, R. M. (1997) Hermeneutics, general studies, and teaching. In S. M. Cahn (Ed.), Classic and Contemporary Readings in the Philosophy of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
45. Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science Education, 90, 468-495.
46. Sandoval, W. A. (July, 2012). Situating epistemological development. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012)-Volume 1, Full Papers. (pp. 203-209). International Society of the Learning Sciences: Sydney, NSW, Australia.
47. Sandoval, W. A., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Wong, J. (2014). Developing children's early competencies to engage with science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 139-152.
48. Sawyer, K. R. (Ed.) (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 398-504.
50. Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 1-16.
51. Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.
52. Strømsø, H. I. & Kammerer, Y. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition and reading for understanding in the Internet age. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 230-246). New York: Routledge.
53. Thagard, P. (1997) Internet Epistemology: Contributions of new information technologies to scientific research.Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo.
54. Thagard, P. (2004). Rationality and science. In A. Mele & P. Rawlings (Eds.), Handbook of rationality (pp. 363-379). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. VanSledright, B. & Maggioni, L. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in history. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 128-146). New York: Routledge.
56. Weinstock, M. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in legal reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 215-229). New York: Routledge.
57. Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). (2015). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The MetaPhysics Research Lab, Stanford University: Stanford, CA. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/.