Mapping innovation systems through patent analysis: The case of technologies for energy efficiency in the residential sector

The Economics of Knowledge Generation and Distribution: The Role of Interactions in the System Dynamics of Innovation and Growth

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 199-220

  Costantini, Valeria ^a   Crespi, Francesco ^a   Palma, Alessandro ^a  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967205816     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203436271     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Andal, M., Oyanagi, S. and Yamakazi, K. (2006), Research on text mining techniques to support patent map generation, Forum on Information Technology 111-12.
2. Antonelli, C. (2003), Knowledge complementarity and fungeability: implications for regional strategy, Regional Studies 37 (6-7), 595-606.
3. Antonelli, C. (2008), Localised Technological Change: Towards the Economics of Complexity, London: Routledge.
4. Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. (1996), Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16 (9), 451-68.
5. Arundel, A. and Kemp, R. (2011), Measuring eco-innovation, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 2009-017, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
6. Arundel, A. and Kabla, I. (1998), What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms, Research Policy 27 (2), 127-41.
7. Baskerville, R. and Pries-Heje, J. (2004), Short cycle time systems development, Information Systems Journal 14, 237-64.
8. Berkhout, F. (2011), Eco-innovation: reflections on an evolving research agenda, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 11, 191-97.
9. Borghesi S., Costantini, V., Crespi, F. and Mazzanti, M., (2013), Environmental innovation and socio-economic dynamics in institutional and policy contexts, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 23 (2), 241-45.
10. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2000), Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent, NBER Working Paper No. 7552.
11. Corrocher N., Malerba, F. and Montobbio, F. (2007), Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field, Research Policy 36 (3), 418-42.
12. Costantini, V., Crespi, F. and Curci, Y. (2013), BioPat: an investigation tool for analysis of industry evolution, technological paths and policy impact in the biofuels sector, in V. Costantini and M. Mazzanti (eds), The Dynamics of Environmental and Economic Systems, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
13. Coulter, N., Monarch, I. and Konda, S. (1998), Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (13), 1206-23.
14. Deerwester, S. C., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Furnas, G. W. and Harshman, R. A. (1990), Indexing by latent semantic analysis, Journal of the American Society of Information Science 41 (6), 391-407.
15. De Looze, M-A. and Lemarie, J. (1997), Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: an application to plant proteins, Scientometrics 39 (3), 267-80.
16. EC (2010), COM/2010/639. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Energy 2020 - a strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, Brussels: European Commission.
17. EC (2011), COM/2011/0109. Energy Efficiency Plan 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee Of The Regions, Brussels: European Commission.
18. EC (2012), Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, 3-58.
19. EC (2013), COM(2013) 253. Energy Technologies and Innovation, Brussels: European Commission.
20. Enerdata (2012), Odyssee Energy Efficiency Database 2012, http://www.enerdata.net/ enerdatauk/solutions/data-management/odyssee.php [accessed 6 May 2014].
21. Frietsch, R. and Schmoch, U. (2006), Technological Structures and Performance as Reflected by Patent Indicators, in U. Schmoch, C. Rammer, H. Legler (eds), National Systems of Innovation in Comparison, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
22. Gillingham, K., Newell, R. and Palmer, K. (2009), Energy efficiency economics and policy, Annual Review of Resource Economics 1, 597-620.
23. Griliches, Z. (1998), Patent statistics as economic indicators: a Survey, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R & D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press.
24. Hall, B. H., Jaffe A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2005), Market value and patent citations, Rand Journal of Economics 36 (1), 16-38.
25. Hascic, I., de Vries, F., Johnstone, N. and Medhi, N. (2009), Effects of environmental policy on the type of innovation: the case of automotive emission-control technologies, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2009 (1), 1-18.
26. Horbach, J., Rammer, C. and Rennings, K. (2012), Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact: the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull, Ecological Economics 78, 112-22.
27. IEA (2009), Gadgets and Gigawatts. Policies for Energy Efficient Electronics, Paris: OECD-IEA Publishing.
28. IEA (2010), Energy Technology Perspective 2010, Paris: OECD-IEA Publishing.
29. IEA (2012), Energy Technology Perspectives 2012, Paris: OECD-IEA Publishing.
30. Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2004), Patents, citations, and innovations: a window on the knowledge economy, Journal of Economic Literature 42 (4), 1158-60.
31. Johnstone, N., Hascic, I. and Popp, D. (2010), Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts, Environmental and Resource Economics 45, 133-55.
32. Johnstone, N., Hascic, I., Poirier, J., Hemar, M. and Michel, C. (2012), Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts, Applied Economics 44 (17), 2157-70.
33. Kemp, R. and Pearson, P. (2008), Measuring eco-innovation, Final Report MEI project, UNU-MERIT. Maastricht.
34. Kemp, R. and Oltra, V. (2011), Research insights and challenges on eco-innovation dynamics, Industry & Innovation 18, 249-53.
35. Kim, Y. G., Suh, J. H. and Park S. C. (2008), Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology, Expert Systems with Applications 34 (3), 1804-12.
36. Kline, S. J. and Rosenberg, N. (1986), An overview of innovation, in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 275-305.
37. Lanjouw, J. O. and Mody, A. (1996), Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy 25 (4), 549-51.
38. Lanjouw, J., Pakes, A. and Putnam, J. (1998), How to count patents and value intellectual property: uses of patent renewal and applications data, Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (4), 405-33.
39. Lanjouw, J. and Schankerman, M. (2004), Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators, Economic Journal 114 (495), 441-65.
40. Lee, S., Yoon, B. and Park, Y. (2009), An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: keyword-based patent map approach, Technovation 29 (6/7), 481-97.
41. Li, X. (2008), Geography of innovation activities: problems and perspectives, South Centre Research Paper 18, Geneva, Switzerland.
42. Linares, P. and Labandeira, X. (2010), Energy efficiency: economics and policy, Journal of Economic Surveys 24 (3), 573-92.
43. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1996), The dynamics and evolution of industries, Industrial and Corporate Change 5 (1), 51-87.
44. Markard, J., Raven, R. and Truffer, B. (2012), Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Research Policy 41, 955-67.
45. Matsuo, Y. and Ishizuka, M. (2004), Keyword extraction from a single document using word co-occurrence statistical information, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 13 (1), 157-69.
46. Nameroff, T. J., Garant, R. J. and Albert, M. B. (2004), Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents, Research Policy 33 (6-7), 959-74.
47. Noailly, J. and Batrakova, S. (2010), Stimulating energy-efficient innovations in the Dutch building sector: empirical evidence from patent counts and policy lessons, Energy Policy 38, 7803-17.
48. OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, Paris: OECD Publishing.
49. OECD (2010), Eco-Innovation in Industry: Enabling Green Growth, Paris: OECD Publishing.
50. OECD (2011), Fostering Innovation for Green Growth, OECD Green Growth Studies, Paris: OECD Publishing.
51. Oltra, V., Kemp, R. and De Vries, F. P. (2010), Patents as a measure for eco-innovation, International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 13 (2), 130-48.
52. Park, H., Yoon, J. and Kim, K. (2012), Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities, Scientometrics 90 (2), 515-29.
53. Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy 13 (6), 343-73.
54. Popp, D. (2002), Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review 92, 160-80.
55. Popp, D. (2005), Lessons from patents: using patents to measure technological change in environmental models, Ecological Economics 54 (2), 209-26.
56. Schutze, H. and Pedersen, J. (1997), A co-occurrence-based thesaurus and two applications to information retrieval, Information processing & Management 33 (3), 307-18.
57. Sirilli, G. (1997), Science and technology indicators: the state of the art and prospects for the future, in G. Antonelli and N. De Liso (eds), Economics of Structural and Technological Change, London: Routledge.
58. Tseng, Y., Lin, C. and Lin, Y. (2007), Text mining techniques for patent analysis, Information Processing and Management 43 (5), 1216-47.
59. Tseng, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., Lin, C. and Juang, D. (2007), Patent surrogate extraction and evaluation in the context of patent mapping, Journal of Information Science 33 (6), 718-36.
60. Uchida, H., Mano, A. and Yukawa, T. (2004), Patent map generation using concept-based vector space model, in Proceedings of the Fourth NTCIR workshop, June 2-4, Tokyo, Japan.
61. van Pottelsberghe, B., Dernis, H. and Guellec, D. (2001), Using patent counts for crosscountry comparisons of technology output, STI Review, 27.
62. Van Zeebroeck, N., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. and Han, W. (2006), Issues in measuring the degree of technological specialisation with patent data, Scientometrics 66 (3), 481-92.
63. Veefkind, V., Hurtado-Albir, J., Angelucci, S., Karachalios, K. and Thumm, N. (2012). A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies, World Patent Information (34), 106-11.
64. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. (2004), A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend, Journal of High Technology Management Research 15 (1), 37-50.
65. Zeimpekis, D. and Gallopoulos, E. (2006), TMG: a Matlab toolbox for generating termdocument matrices from text collections, in J. Kogan, C. Nicholas and M. Teboulle (eds), Grouping Multidimensional Data: Recent Advances in Clustering, Berlin: Springer, pp. 187-210.