A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades

Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1-16

  Jiang, Wen ^a   Xie, Chunhe ^a   Wei, Boya ^a   Zhou, Deyun ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aircraft turbine rotor blades; Basic believe assignments; Dempster Shafer evidence theory; Failure mode and effects analysis; Reliability coefficient; Risk priority number

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967057438     PISSN: 16878132     EISSN: 16878140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1687814016644579     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Vliegen HJW, Van Mal HH,. Rational decision making: structuring of design meetings. IEEE T Eng Manage 1990; 37: 185-190.
2. Linton JD., Facing the challenges of service automation: an enabler for e-commerce and productivity gain in traditional services. IEEE T Eng Manage 2003; 50: 478-484.
3. Chin KS, Wang YM, Poon GKK,. Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Comput Oper Res 2009; 36: 1768-1779.
4. Kim KM, Yun N, Yun HJ,. Failure analysis in after shell section of gas turbine combustion liner under base-load operation. Eng Fail Anal 2010; 17: 848-856.
5. Silveira E, Atxaga G, Irisarri AM., Failure analysis of two sets of aircraft blades. Eng Fail Anal 2010; 17: 641-647.
6. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R., Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 2003; 19: 425-443.
7. Yang J, Huang HZ, He LP,. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty. Eng Fail Anal 2011; 18: 2084-2092.
8. Du Y, Lu X, Su X,. New failure mode and effects analysis: an evidential downscaling method. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2016; 32: 737-746.
9. Pillay A, Wang J., Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2003; 79: 69-85.
10. Sankar NR, Prabhu BS., Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 2001; 18: 324-336.
11. Sawant A, Dieterich S, Svatos M,. Failure mode and effect analysis-based quality assurance for dynamic MLC tracking systems. Med Phys 2010; 37: 6466-6479.
12. Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK., Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE T Reliab 2011; 60: 102-110.
13. Bowles JB, Pelaez CE., Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 1995; 50: 203-213.
14. Gilchrist W., Modelling failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 1993; 10: 16-23.
15. Chang KH., Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology. Microelectron Reliab 2009; 49: 1586-1596.
16. Zadeh LA., Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 1965; 8: 338-353.
17. Rikhtegar N, Mansouri N, Ahadi Oroumieh A,. Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects. Ekon Istraž [ Economic Research ] 2014; 27: 378-392.
18. Jiang W, Luo Y, Qin X,. An improved method to rank generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2015; 28: 2343-2355.
19. Kahraman C, Onar SC, Oztaysi B., Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int J Comput Int Sys 2015; 8: 637-666.
20. Jiang W, Yang Y, Luo Y,. Determining basic probability assignment based on the improved similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. Int J Comput Commun 2015; 10: 333-347.
21. Noori B., Developing a CBR system for marketing mix planning and weighting method selection using fuzzy AHP. Appl Artif Intell 2015; 29: 1-32.
22. Liu Y., A method for 2-tuple linguistic dynamic multiple attribute decision making with entropy weight. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2014; 27: 1803-1810.
23. Song Y, Wang X, Lei L,. A novel similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with its applications. Appl Intell 2015; 42: 252-261.
24. Selim H, Yunusoglu MG, Yilmaz Balaman S., A dynamic maintenance planning framework based on fuzzy TOPSIS and FMEA: application in an international food company. Qual Reliab Eng Int. Epub ahead of print 6 April 2015. DOI: 10.1002/qre.1791.
25. Liu HC, Liu L, Lin QL., Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. IEEE T Reliab 2013; 62: 23-36.
26. Liu HC, You JX, Fan XJ,. Failure mode and effects analysis using d numbers and grey relational projection method. Expert Syst Appl 2014; 41: 4670-4679.
27. Deng Y, Shi WK, Zhu ZF,. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decis Support Syst 2004; 38: 489-493.
28. Su X, Deng Y, Mahadevan S,. An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades. Eng Fail Anal 2012; 26: 164-174.
29. Yager R., On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inform Sciences 1987; 41: 93-137.
30. Murphy CK., Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis Support Syst 2000; 29: 1-9.
31. Jousselme AL, Grenier D, Bosse E., A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inform Fusion 2001; 2: 91-101.
32. Dempster AP., Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 1966; 38: 57-72.
33. Shafer G., A mathematical theory of evidence, vol. 20. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976, p. 242.
34. Fu C, Yang S., An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements. Eur J Oper Res 2012; 223: 167-176.
35. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J., A belief classification rule for imprecise data. Appl Intell 2014; 40: 214-228.
36. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J,. Credal classification rule for uncertain data based on belief functions. Pattern Recogn 2014; 47: 2532-2541.
37. Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P,. Dependence assessment in Human Reliability Analysis using evidence theory and AHP. Risk Anal 2015; 35: 1296-1316.
38. Wang Y, Dai Y, Chen YW,. The evidential reasoning approach to medical diagnosis using intuitionistic fuzzy Dempster-Shafer theory. Int J Comput Int Sys 2015; 8: 75-94.
39. Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Francisque A,. Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model. Eur J Oper Res 2015; 240: 220-234.
40. Deng X, Hu Y, Deng Y,. Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Syst Appl 2014; 41: 156-167.
41. Bandyopadhyay S, Bhattacharya R., Finding optimum neighbor for routing based on multi-criteria, multi-agent and fuzzy approach. J Intell Manuf 2015; 26: 25-42.
42. Liang D, Pedrycz W, Liu D,. Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 2015; 29: 256-269.
43. Deng Y., Generalized evidence theory. Appl Intell 2015; 43: 530-543.
44. Xiao N, Huang HZ, Li Y,. Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA. Eng Fail Anal 2011; 18: 1162-1170.
45. Utkin LV., A new ranking procedure by incomplete pairwise comparisons using preference subsets. Intell Data Anal 2009; 13: 229-241.
46. Huynh VN, Nguyen TT, Le CA., Adaptively entropy-based weighting classifiers in combination using Dempster-Shafer theory for word sense disambiguation. Comput Speech Lang 2010; 24: 461-473.
47. Deng Y, Mahadevan S, Zhou D., Vulnerability assessment of physical protection systems: a bio-inspired approach. Int J Unconv Comput 2015; 11: 227-243.
48. Yager RR, Alajlan N., Decision making with ordinal payoffs under Dempster-Shafer type uncertainty. Int J Intell Syst 2013; 28: 1039-1053.
49. Yang JB, Xu DL., Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination. Artif Intell 2013; 205: 1-29.
50. Schubert J., Conflict management in Dempster-Shafer theory using the degree of falsity. Int J Approx Reason 2011; 52: 449-460.
51. Rao SS, Annamdas KK., A comparative study of evidence theories in the modeling, analysis, and design of engineering systems. J Mech Des: T ASME 2013; 135: 189-197.
52. Kennes PSR,. The transferable belief model. Artif Intell 1994; 66: 191-234.