An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades

Engineering Failure Analysis

Volumn 26, Issue , 2012, Pages 164-174

  Su, Xiaoyan ^a   Deng, Yong ^b,c   Mahadevan, Sankaran ^c   Bao, Qilian ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Engine rotor blade; Evidence theory; Failure modes and effects analysis; Risk priority number

Indexed keywords

BASIC BELIEF ASSIGNMENT; CONFLICTING EVIDENCE; D S EVIDENCE THEORY; DEMPSTER'S COMBINATION RULES; DEMPSTER-SHAFER EVIDENCE THEORY; EVIDENCE THEORIES; FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; REAL APPLICATIONS; RISK EVALUATION; RISK PRIORITY; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER; ROTOR BLADES; SUBJECTIVE INFORMATION;

AIRCRAFT ENGINES; SAFETY FACTOR;

TURBOMACHINE BLADES;

EID: 84868315160     PISSN: 13506307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kim K.M., Yun N., Jeon Y.H., Lee D.H., Cho H.H. Failure analysis in after shell section of gas turbine combustion liner under base-load operation. Eng Fail Anal 2010, 17:848-856.
2. Silveira E., Atxaga G., Irisarri A.M. Failure analysis of two sets of aircraft blades. Eng Fail Anal 2010, 17:641-647.
3. Wang Z., Huang H.Z., Du L. Reliability analysis on competitive failure processes under fuzzy degradation data. Appl Soft Comput 2011, 11:2964-2973.
4. Yang J.P., Huang H.Z., He L.P., Zhu S.P., Wen D.W. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty. Eng Fail Anal 2011, 18:2084-2092.
5. Sawant A., Dieterich S., Svatos M., Keall P. Failure mode and effect analysis-based quality assurance for dynamic MLC tracking systems. Med Phys 2010, 37:6466-6480.
6. Gargama H., Chaturvedi S.K. Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Reliab 2011, 60:102-110.
7. Sankar N.R., Prabhu B.S. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 2001, 18:324-336.
8. Chang K.H. Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology. Microelectr Reliab 2009, 49:1586-1596.
9. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S., Poon G.K.K., Yang J.B. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36:1195-1207.
10. Chin K.S., Wang Y.M., Poon G.K.K., Yang J.B. Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Comput Oper Res 2009, 36:1768-1779.
11. Xiao N.C., Huang H.Z., Li Y.F., He L.P., Jin T.D. Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA. Eng Fail Anal 2011, 18:1162-1170.
12. Simon C., Weber P. Evidential networks for reliability analysis and performance evaluation of systems with imprecise knowledge. IEEE Trans Reliab 2009, 58:69-87.
13. Deng Y., Su X.Y., Wang D., Li Q. Target recognition based on fuzzy Dempster data fusion method. Defence Sci J 2010, 60:525-530.
14. Guo H., Shi W., Deng Y. Evaluating sensor reliability in classification problems based on evidence theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber B 2006, 36:970-981.
15. Mahadevan S., Rebba R. Validation of reliability computational models using Bayes networks. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2005, 87:223-232.
16. Su X.Y., Deng Y., Wu Y., Jiang W. Fault pattern classification using modified Dempster-Shafer (D-S) combination rule. J Vib Meas Diagn 2011, 31:144-149.
17. Yang J.P., Huang H.Z., Miao Q., Sun R. A novel information fusion method based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for conflict resolution. Intell Data Anal 2011, 15:399-411.
18. Deng Y., Chan F.T.S., Wu Y., Wang D. A new linguistic MCDM method based on multiple-criterion data fusion. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38:9854-9861.
19. Deng Y., Chan F.T.S. A new fuzzy Dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38:6985-6993.
20. Deng Y., Jiang W., Sadiq R. Modeling contaminant intrusion in water distribution networks: a new similarity-based DST method. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38:571-578.
21. Deng Y., Sadiq R., Jiang W., Tesfamariam S. Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: a fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38:15438-15446.
22. Su X.Y., Wu J.Y., Zhang H.J., Li Z.Q., Sun X.H., Deng Y. Assessment of grain security in china by using the AHP and DST methods. J Agric Sci Technol 2012, 14:715-726.
23. Kang B., Deng Y., Sadiq R., Mahadevan S. Evidential cognitive maps. Knowl-Based Syst 2012, 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.04.007.
24. Liu J., Chan F.T.S., Li Y., Zhang Y.J., Deng Y. A new optimal consensus method with minimum cost in fuzzy group decision. Knowl-Based Syst 2012, 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.04.015.
25. Yong D., Qi L. A topsis-based centroid-index ranking method of fuzzy numbers and its application in decision-making. Cybern Syst Anal 2005, 36:581-595.
26. Deng Y., Shi W.K., Zhu Z.F., Liu Q. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decis Support Syst 2004, 38:489-493.
27. Smets P. The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 1990, 12:447-458.
28. Yager R.R. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inform Sci 1987, 41:93-137.
29. Inagaki T. Interdependence between safety-control policy and multiple-sensor schemes via Dempster-Shafer theory. IEEE Trans Reliab 1991, 40:182-188.
30. Murphy C.K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis Support Syst 2000, 9:1-9.
31. Deng Y., Shi W.K., Zhu Z.F. Efficient combination approach of conflict evidence. J Infrared Millim Waves 2004, 23:27-32.
32. Dempster A.P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Ann Math Stat 1967, 38:325-339.
33. Shafer G. A mathematical theory of evidence 1976, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
34. Jaynes E.T., Bretthorst G.L. Probability theory: the logic of science 2003, Cambridge University Press.