Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA

Engineering Failure Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1162-1170

  Xiao, Ningcong ^a   Huang, Hong Zhong ^a   Li, Yanfeng ^a   He, Liping ^a   Jin, Tongdan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b Texas State University   (United States)

Author keywords

FMEA; Multiple failures mode; Risk priority number; Weight risk priority number

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX SYSTEMS; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; FMEA; MINIMUM CUT; MULTIPLE FAILURE MODES; MULTIPLE FAILURES; NON-REPAIRABLE SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER; WEIGHT RISK PRIORITY NUMBER;

FAILURE MODES; NUMERICAL METHODS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

EID: 79954601977     PISSN: 13506307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Pickard K, Müller P, Bertsche B. Multiple failure mode and effects analysis: an approach to risk assessment of multiple failures with FMEA. Reliability and maintainability symposium, 2005. Annual, Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc; 2005. p. 457-62.
2. Chen J.K. Utility priority number evaluation for FMEA. J Fail Anal Prev 2007, 7(5):321-328.
3. Hung G.Q., Nie M., Mar K.L. Web-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). Comput Ind Eng 1999, 37(1-2):177-180.
4. Onodera K. Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle stage. Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc; 1997. p. 50-6.
5. Hsu CW, Hu AH, Wu WC. Using FMEA and FAHP to Risk Evaluation of Green Components. Proceeding of 2008 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment. San Francisco, Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc; 2008. p. 19-21.
6. Bluvband Z, Grabov P, Nakar O. Expanded FMEA (EFMEA). Reliability and maintainability symposium, 2004. Annual, Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc; 2004. p. 31-6.
7. Patrick D. Practical reliability engineering 2004, Publish House of Electronics Industry, Beijing. 4th ed.
8. Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). QS-9000 Reference Manual; 1995.
9. Huang H.Z., Tong X., Zuo M.J. Posbist fault tree analysis of coherent systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2004, 84(2):141-149.
10. Durga R.K., Gopika V., Sanyasi R.V., et al. Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2009, 94(4):872-883.
11. Cpin M., Mavko B. A dynamic fault tree. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2002, 75(1):83-91.
12. Huang C.Y., Chang Y.R. An improved decomposition scheme for assessing the reliability of embedded systems by using dynamic fault trees. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2007, 92(10):1403-1412.
13. Yuge T., Yanagi S. Quantitative analysis of a fault tree with priority AND gates. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2008, 93(11):1577-1583.
14. Merie G., Roussel J.M., Lesaqe J.J., et al. Probabilistic algebraic analysis of fault trees with priority dynamic gates and repeated events. IEEE Trans Reliab 2010, 59(1):250-261.
15. Guo Y.J. Principle of reliability engineering 2002, Pubish House of TsingHua University, Beijing.
16. Cao J.H., Cheng K. Reliability mathematics theory 2006, Higher Education Press, Beijing.