Identifying and overcoming tension in interdisciplinary teamwork in professional development

Affective Learning Together: Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 185-204

  Sins, Patrick ^a,b   Karlgren, Klas ^c  

^a SAXION UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917280861     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203069684     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Argyris, C., and Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., and Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a com-munity of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), pp. 489-542.
3. Dewey, J. (1968). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Free Press.
4. De Dreu, C.K.W., and Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using Confl ict in Organizations. London: Sage.
5. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to DevelopmentalResearch. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
6. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, pp. 319-36.
7. Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activitytheoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63-93.
8. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 247-273.
9. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
10. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., and Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the Third Space. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 6(4), pp. 286-303.
11. Kaptelinin, V. (2002). Social thinking reaches out to software practice: The challenge of bridg-ing activity systems. InY. Dittrich, C. Floyd eds., Social Thinking-Software Practice, pp. 45-68. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Koschmann, T., Kuutti, K., and Hickman, L. (1998). The concept of breakdown in Heidegger, Leont’ev, and Dewey and its implications for education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, pp. 25-41.
13. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi, ed. (1996), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 17-44. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
14. Little, J.W. (1990). Teachers as colleagues. In A. Lieberman, ed. 1990, Schools as CollaborativeCultures: Creating the Future Now, pp. 165-93. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
15. Nevis, E.C., DiBella, A.J., and Gould, J.M. (1995). Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), pp. 75-85.
16. Paavola, S., Hakkarainen, K.: The Knowledge Creation Metaphor-An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning. Science & Education 14(6), 535-557 (2005)
17. Prins, E. (2005). Framing a conflict in a community-university partnership. Journal of PlanningEducation and Research, 25, pp. 57-74.
18. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), pp. 243-63.
19. Rudolph, J.W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R.L. and Raemer, D. (2006). There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simulation in Healthcare, 1(1), pp. 49-55.
20. Schatzki, T. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Exploration of the Constitution of SocialLife and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
21. Schön, D.A. and Rein, M. (1994). Frame Refl ection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable PolicyControversies. New York: Basic Books.
22. Stahl, G. (1993). Interpretation in Design: The Problem of Tacit and Explicit Understanding inComputer Support of Cooperative Design. Ph.D. University of Colorado.
23. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfi gurations. NewYork: Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundationfor Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corporation.
25. Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. and Haudenschild, M.T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 25, pp. 507-17.