Genomic selection in multi-environment crop trials

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1313-1326

  Oakey, Helena ^a   Cullis, Brian ^b   Thompson, Robin ^c   Comadran, Jordi ^a,d   Halpin, Claire ^a   Waugh, Robbie ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d Rothamsted Research ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Barley; GEBV; Genomic selection; GenPred; Multienvironment trial; Random ridge regression; Shared data resource

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; BREEDING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CULTIVAR; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HEIGHT; HUMAN; PREDICTION; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROP; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INHERITANCE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ENVIRONMENT; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84966430915     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.027524     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akaike, H., 1974 New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC19: 716-723.
2. Burgueno, J., G. de los Campos, K. Weigel, and J. Crossa, 2012 Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 52: 707-719.
3. Butler, D., B. Cullis, A. Gilmour, and B. Gogel (Editors), 2009 ASReml R-reference manual, VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.
4. Comadran, J., B. Kilian, and J. Russell, L. Ramsay, N. Stein et al., 2012 Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley. Nat. Genet. 44: 1388-1392.
5. Crossa, J., G. de los Campos, P. Perez, D. Gianola, J. Burgueno et al., 2010 Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186: 713-724.
6. Crossa, J., P. Perez, G. de los Campos, G. Mahuku, S. Dreisigacker et al., 2011 Genomic selection and prediction in plant breeding. J. Crop Improv. 25: 239-261.
7. Cullis, B., B. Gogel, A. Verbyla, and R. Thompson, 1998 Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation trials. Biometrics 54: 1-18.
8. Cullis, B., A. Smith, and N. Coombes, 2006 On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 11: 381-393.
9. Da, Y., C. Wang, S. Wang, and G. Hu, 2014 Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers. PLoS One 9: e87666.
10. de Boer, I. J. M., and I. Hoeschele, 1993 Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 245-258.
11. de los Campos, G., J. Hickey, R. Pong-Wong, H. Daetwyler, and M. Calus, 2013 Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics 193: 327-345.
12. Desta, Z. A., and R. Ortiz, 2014 Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 19: 592-601.
13. Gilmour, A., B. Cullis, and A. Verbyla, 1997 Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2: 269-293.
14. Guo, Z., D. M. Tucker, D. Wang, C. J. Basten, E. Ersoz et al., 2013 Accuracy of across-environment genome wide prediction in maize nested association mapping populations. G3 (Bethesda) 3: 263-272.
15. Habier, D., R. Fernado, and J. Dekker, 2007 The impact of genetic relationship information on genome assisted breeding values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
16. Habier, D., R. Fernando, and D. Garrick, 2013 Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics 194: 597-607.
17. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, B. Narasimhan, and G. Chu, 2014 impute: Imputation for microarray data. R package version 1.36.0. Available at: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/impute.html. Accessed: April 21, 2014.
18. Heffner, E. L., A. J. Lorenz, J.-L. Jannink, and M. E. Sorrells, 2010 Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci. 50: 1681-1690.
19. Heffner, E. L., J.-L. Jannink, H. Iwata, E. Souza, and M. E. Sorrells, 2011a Genomic selection accuracy for grain quality traits in biparental wheat populations. Crop Sci. 51: 2597-2606.
20. Heffner, E. L., J.-L. Jannink, and M. E. Sorrells, 2011b Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 4: 65-75.
21. Heslot, N., H.-P. Yang, M. Sorrells, and J.-L. Jannink, 2012 Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci. 52: 146-160.
22. Jannink, J., A. Lorenz, and H. Iwata, 2010 Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief. Funct. Genomics 9: 166-177.
23. Jonas, E., and D.-J. De Koning, 2013 Does genomic selection have a future in plant breeding? Trends Biotechnol. 31: 497-504.
24. Kelly, A. M., A. B. Smith, J. A. Eccleston, and B. R. Cullis, 2007 The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Sci. 47: 1063-1070.
25. Lado, B., I. Matus, A. Rodriguez, L. Inostroza, J. Poland et al., 2013 Increased genomic prediction accuracy in wheat breeding through spatial adjustment of field trial data. G3 (Bethesda) 2: 2015-2113.
26. Ly, D., M. Hamblin, I. Rabbi, G. Melaku, M. Bakare et al., 2013 Relatedness and genotype × environment interaction affect prediction accuracies in genomic selection: a study in cassava. Crop Sci. 53: 1312.
27. Massman, J. M., H.-J. G. Jung, and R. Bernardo, 2013 Genomewide selection verses marker-assisted recurrent selection to improve grain yield and stover-quality traits for cellulosic ethanol in maize. Crop Sci. 53: 58-66.
28. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard, 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
29. Munoz, P. R., M. F. R. J. Resende, S. A. Gexan, M. D. V. Resende, G. de los Campos et al., 2014 Unravelling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices. Genetics 198: 1759-1768.
30. Oakey, H., R. Shafiei, J. Comadran, N. Uzrek, B. Cullis et al., 2013 Identification of crop cultivars with consistently high lignocellulosic sugar release requires the use of appropriate statistical design and modelling. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6: 185.
31. Patterson, H. D., V. Silvey, M. Talbot, and S. T. C. Weatherup, 1977 Variability of yields of cereal varieties in U. K. trials. J. Agric. Sci. 89: 238-245.
32. Piepho, H., J. Ogutu, T. Schulz-Streeck, B. Estaghvirou, A. Gordillo et al., 2012 Efficient computation of ridge-regression best linear unbiased prediction in genomic selection in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 52: 1093-1104.
33. R Core Team, 2015 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
34. Smith, A., B. Cullis, and R. Thompson, 2001 Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57: 1138-1147.
35. Smith, A., B. Cullis, and R. Thompson, 2005 The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluations trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143: 1-14.
36. Solberg, T. R., A. K. Sonesson, J. a. Wooliams, J. Ødegard, and T. H. E. Meuwissen, 2009 Persistence of accuracy of genome-wide breeding values over generations when including a polygenic effect. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41: 53.
37. Stranden, I., and D. Garrick, 2009 Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 2971-2975.
38. Tibshirani, R., 1996 Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 58: 267-288.
39. Wang, C.-L., P.-P. Ma, Z. Zhang, X.-D. Ding, J.-F. Lui et al., 2012 Comparison of five methods for genomic breeding value estimation for the common dataser of the 15th QTL-MAS workshop. BMC Proc. 6(Suppl 2): S13.
40. Wimmer, V., C. Lehermeier, T. Albrecht, H.-J. Auinger, Y. Wang et al., 2013 Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection. Genetics 195: 573-587.
41. Zhong, S., J. Dekker, R. Fernado, and J.-L. Jannink, 2009 Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study. Genetics 182: 355-364.
42. Zou, H., and T. Hastie, 2005 Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 67: 301-320.