Does genomic selection have a future in plant breeding?

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 497-504

  Jonas, Elisabeth ^a   De Koning, Dirk Jan ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Crops; Estimated breeding value; Genomic selection; Marker assisted selection

Indexed keywords

BLACK BOX APPROACH; ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMIC SELECTION; MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; MOLECULAR METHODS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

AGRICULTURE; CROPS;

GENES;

CROP MANAGEMENT; DAIRY CATTLE; GENETIC SELECTION; MARKER GENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

BOS;

EID: 84882723373     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Mackay I., Powell W. Methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping in crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12:57-63.
2. Dekkers J.C.M., Hospital F. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:22-32.
3. Henderson C.R. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 1975, 31:423-447.
4. Lande R., Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 1990, 124:743-756.
5. Meuwissen T.H.E., Goddard M.E. Marker-assisted selection in animal breeding schemes. Anim. Genet. 1996, 27(Suppl 2):101.
6. Liu Y., et al. Functional markers in wheat: current status and future prospects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125:1-10.
7. Hu Z.-L., Reecy J.M. Animal QTLdb: beyond a repository. Mamm. Genome 2007, 18:1-4.
8. Ni J., et al. Gramene QTL database: development, content and applications. Database 2009, 2009. 10.1093/database/bap005.
9. Bernardo R. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: Learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:1649-1664.
10. Wiener P., Wilkinson S. Deciphering the genetic basis of animal domestication. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:3161-3170.
11. Meuwissen T.H.E., et al. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
12. Davey J.W., et al. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:499-510.
13. Hayes B., et al. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:433-443.
14. Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. Genomic selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007, 124:323-330.
15. Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:381-391.
16. Schaeffer L.R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123:218-223.
17. Patry C. Impacts of genomic selection on classical genetic evaluations. Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative (GABI) 2011, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA).
18. Jackson S.A., et al. Sequencing crop genomes: approaches and applications. New Phytol. 2011, 191:915-925.
19. Lorenzana R.E., Bernardo R. Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 120:151-161.
20. Heffner E.L., et al. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:1-12.
21. Cabrera-Bosquet L., et al. High-throughput phenotyping and genomic selection: The frontiers of crop breeding converge. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54:312-320.
22. Heffner E.L., et al. Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 2011, 4:65-75.
23. Sharma H.C., et al. Applications of biotechnology for crop improvement: prospects and constraints. Plant Sci. 2002, 163:381-395.
24. Hamblin M.T., et al. Population genetics of genomics-based crop improvement methods. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:98-106.
25. Wientjes Y.C.J., et al. The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics 2013, 193:621-631.
26. Asoro F.G., et al. Accuracy and training population design for genomic selection on quantitative traits in elite North American oats. Plant Genome 2011, 4:132-144.
27. Morrell P.L., et al. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:85-96.
28. Gregory T.R., et al. Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:D332-D338.
29. Feuillet C., et al. Crop genome sequencing: lessons and rationales. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:77-88.
30. Brenchley R., et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491:705-710.
31. Shendure J., Aiden E.L. The expanding scope of DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:1084-1094.
32. Elshire R.J., et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379.
33. Crossa J., et al. Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 2010, 186:713-724.
34. Heslot N., et al. Using genomic prediction to characterize environments and optimize prediction accuracy in applied breeding data. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:921-933.
35. Massman J.M., et al. Genomewide predictions from maize single-cross data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:13-22.
36. Nakaya A., Isobe S.N. Will genomic selection be a practical method for plant breeding?. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110:1303-1316.
37. Piepho H.P., et al. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 2008, 161:209-228.
38. Koebner R.M.D., Summers R.W. 21st century wheat breeding: plot selection or plate detection?. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21:59-63.
39. Resende M.F.R., et al. Accelerating the domestication of trees using genomic selection: accuracy of prediction models across ages and environments. New Phytol. 2012, 193:617-624.
40. Funk D.A. Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:1362-1368.
41. Fernie A.R., Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:39-48.
42. Gärtner T., et al. Improved heterosis prediction by combining information on DNA- and metabolic markers. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5220.
43. Schulz-Streeck T., et al. Genomic selection using multiple populations. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:2453-2461.
44. Lorenz A.J., et al. Potential and optimization of genomic selection for fusarium head blight resistance in six-row barley. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:1609-1621.
45. Zhao Y., et al. Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124:769-776.