Persistence of accuracy of genome-wide breeding values over generations when including a polygenic effect

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Solberg, Trygve ^a   Sonesson, Anna ^b   Woolliams, John ^a,c   Degard, Jørgen ^a,b   Meuwissen, Theo ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BREEDING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME;

TULIP BREAKING VIRUS;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; MUTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKERS; LINEAR MODELS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; MUTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 77949662136     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-53     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. On marker-assisted prediction of genetic value: Beyond the ridge. Gianola D Perez-Enciso M Toro MA, Genetics 2003 163 374 365
2. Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Gianola D Fernando RL Stella A, Genetics 2006 173 1761 1776 10.1534/genetics.105.049510 16648593
3. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE Hayes BJ Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733
4. Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Solberg TR Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 29 10.1186/1297-9686-41-29 19296851
5. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Calus MPL Meuwissen THE, de Roos APW Veerkamp RF, Genetics 2008 178 553 561 10.1534/genetics.107.080838 18202394
6. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Habier D Fernando RL Dekkers JCM, Genetics 2007 177 2389 2397 18073436
7. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Muir WM, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 342 355 18076471
8. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. Solberg TR Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 2008 86 2447 2454 10.2527/jas.2007-0010 18407980
9. Gjedrem T, Selection and Breeding Programs in Aquaculture Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2005 10-1-4020-3341-9 full-text
10. Lynch M Walsh B, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits Sinauer Associates, Inc. Massachusetts, USA 1998
11. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Sonesson AK Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 37 10.1186/1297-9686-41-37 19566932
12. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. Calus MPL Veerkamp RF, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 362 368 18076473
13. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Hayes BJ Goddard ME, Genet Sel Evol 2001 33 209 229 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209 11403745
14. Gilks WR Richardson S Spiegelhalter DJ, Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, UK 1996 0-412-05551-1
15. Sørensen D Gianola D, Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics Springer-Verlag, New York, USA 2002 0-387-95440-6
16. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Meuwissen THE Luo Z, Genet Sel Evol 1992 24 305 313 10.1186/1297-9686-24-4-305