Genomic Landscape of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) and Solo LTRs as Shaped by Ectopic Recombination in Chicken and Zebra Finch

Journal of Molecular Evolution

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 251-263

  Ji, Yanzhu ^a   DeWoody, J Andrew ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endogenous retrovirus; Non allelic homologous recombination; Red jungle fowl; Solo LTR

Indexed keywords

RETROPOSON;

ANIMAL; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; FINCH; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; RETROPOSON;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FINCHES; GENOMICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; RETROELEMENTS; TERMINAL REPEAT SEQUENCES;

EID: 84966349614     PISSN: 00222844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-016-9741-0     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Backström N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H et al (2010) The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res 20:485–495. doi:10.1101/gr.101410.109
2. Baker BS, Carpenterl ATC, Carolina N et al (1976) The genetic control of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 10:53–134. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000413
3. Barrón MG, Fiston-Lavier A-S, Petrov DA, González J (2014) Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet 48:561–581. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092359
4. Benkel B, Rutherford K (2014) Endogenous avian leukosis viral loci in the Red Jungle Fowl genome assembly. Poult Sci 93:2988–2990. doi:10.3382/ps.2014-04309
5. Bennetzen JL, Kellogg EA (1997) Do plants have a oe-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell 9:1509–1514
6. Bergero R, Charlesworth D (2008) The evolution of restricted recombination in sex chromosomes. Trends Ecol Evol 24:94–102. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.010
7. Braun EL, Kimball RT, Han K-L et al (2011) Homoplastic microinversions and the avian tree of life. BMC Evol Biol 11:141. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-141
8. Burt DW (2002) Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 96:97–112
9. Champely S (2015) pwr: basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.1-3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
10. Charlesworth B (1991) Transposable elements in natural populations with a mixture of selected and neutral insertion sites. Genet Res 57:127–134. doi:10.1017/S0016672300029190
11. Charlesworth B, Campos JL (2014) The relations between recombination rate and patterns of molecular variation and evolution in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet 48:383–403. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092525
12. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1983) The population dynamics of transposable elements. Genet Res 42:1–27. doi:10.1017/S0016672300021455
13. Cui J, Zhao W, Huang Z et al (2014) Low frequency of paleoviral infiltration across the avian phylogeny. Genome Biol 15:539. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0539-3
14. Dolgin ES, Charlesworth B, Cutter AD (2008) Population frequencies of transposable elements in selfing and outcrossing Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genet Res (Camb) 90:317–329. doi:10.1017/S0016672308009440
15. Du J, Tian Z, Hans CS et al (2010) Evolutionary conservation, diversity and specificity of LTR-retrotransposons in flowering plants: insights from genome-wide analysis and multi-specific comparison. Plant J 63:584–598. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04263.x
16. Eddy SR (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14:755–763
17. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340
18. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
19. Elferink MG, van As P, Veenendaal T et al (2010) Regional differences in recombination hotspots between two chicken populations. BMC Genet 11:11. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-11
20. Ellegren H (2010) Evolutionary stasis: the stable chromosomes of birds. Trends Ecol Evol 25:283–291. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.004
21. Ellinghaus D, Kurtz S, Willhoeft U (2008) LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinform 9:18. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-18
22. Epplen JT, Leipoldt M, Engel W, Schmidtke J (1978) DNA sequence organisation in avian genomes. Chromosoma 69:307–321. doi:10.1007/BF00332134
23. Farré M, Micheletti D, Ruiz-Herrera A (2013) Recombination rates and genomic shuffling in human and chimpanzee—a new twist in the chromosomal speciation theory. Mol Biol Evol 30:853–864. doi:10.1093/molbev/mss272
24. Frahry MB, Sun C, Chong RA, Mueller RL (2015) Low levels of LTR retrotransposon deletion by ectopic recombination in the gigantic genomes of salamanders. J Mol Evol 80:120–129. doi:10.1007/s00239-014-9663-7
25. Fridolfsson A-K, Heng H, Copeland NG et al (1998) Evolution of the avian sex chromosomes from an ancestral pair of autosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8147–8152
26. González J, Petrov DA (2012) Evolutionary of genome content: population dynamics of transposable elements in flies and humans. In: Anisimova M (ed) Evolutionary genomics: statistical and computational methods, vol 1. Springer Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp 361–383
27. Goodchild NL, Wilkinson DA, Mager DL (1993) Recent evolutionary expansion of a subfamily of RTVL-H Human Endogenous Retrovirus-like elements. Virology 196:778–788
28. Gregory TR (2002) A bird’s-eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class Aves. Evolution (NY) 56:121–130
29. Gregory TR, Andrews CB, McGuire JA, Witt CC (2009) The smallest avian genomes are found in hummingbirds. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:3753–3757. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1004
30. Groenen MAM, Wahlberg P, Foglio M et al (2009) A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res 19:510–519. doi:10.1101/gr.086538.108
31. Hayward A, Grabherr M, Jern P (2013) Broad-scale phylogenomics provides insights into retrovirus-host evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:20146–20151. doi:10.1073/pnas.1315419110
32. Hill WG, Robertson A (1966) The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res 8:269–294. doi:10.1017/S0016672300010156
33. Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Baertsch R et al (2006) The UCSC genome browser database: update 2006. Nucl Acids Res 34:D590–D598. doi:10.1093/nar/gkj144
34. Huda A, Polavarapu N, Jordan IK, McDonald JF (2008) Endogenous retroviruses of the chicken genome. Biol Direct 3:9. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-3-9
35. Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1995) Small genomes for better flyers. Nature 377:391
36. ICGSC (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695–716. doi:10.1038/nature03154
37. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A et al (2005) Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:462–467. doi:10.1159/000084979
38. Kaback DB, Guacci V, Barber D, Mahon JW (1992) Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. Science 256:228–232
39. Kaback DB, Barber D, Mahon J et al (1999) Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics 152:1475–1486
40. Katzourakis A, Pereira V, Tristem M (2007) Effects of recombination rate on human endogenous retrovirus fixation and persistence. J Virol 81:10712–10717. doi:10.1128/JVI.00410-07
41. Kim JM, Vanguri S, Boeke JD et al (1998) Transposable elements and genome organization: a comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. Genome Res 8:464–478. doi:10.1101/gr.8.5.464
42. Langley CH, Montgomery E, Hudson R et al (1988) On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res 52:223–235. doi:10.1017/S0016672300027695
43. Lichten M, Borts RH, Haber JE (1986) Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over between dispersed homologous sequences occurs frequently in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 115:233–246
44. Liu GE, Hou Y, Brown T (2013) Analysis of CR1 repeats in the zebra finch genome. Syst Cybern Inform 11:66–71
45. Lynch M, Conery JS (2003) The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401–1404. doi:10.1126/science.1089370
46. Nam K, Ellegren H (2012) Recombination drives vertebrate genome contraction. PLoS Genet 8:e1002680. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002680
47. Petrov DA (2002) Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theor Popul Biol 61:531–544. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2002.1605
48. Quinlan AR, Hall IM (2010) BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
49. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
50. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 16:2–3
51. Romanov MN, Farré M, Lithgow PE et al (2014) Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor. BMC Genom 15:1060. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-1060
52. Sanmiguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin Y et al (1996) Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic gegions of the maize genome. Science (80-)274:765–768
53. Sasaki M, Lange J, Keeney S (2010) Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:182–195. doi:10.1038/nrm2849
54. Sniegowski PD, Charlesworth B (1994) Transposable element numbers in cosmopolitan inversions From a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 137:815–827
55. Sun C, Shepard DB, Chong RA et al (2012) LTR retrotransposons contribute to genomic gigantism in plethodontid salamanders. Genome Biol Evol 4:168–183. doi:10.1093/gbe/evr139
56. Tiley GP, Burleigh JG (2015) The relationship of recombination rate, genome structure, and patterns of molecular evolution across angiosperms. BMC Evol Biol 15:194. doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0473-3
57. Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL (2012) Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 13:36–46. doi:10.1038/nrg3117
58. Uno Y, Nishida C, Tarui H et al (2012) Inference of the protokaryotypes of amniotes and tetrapods and the evolutionary processes of microchromosomes from comparative gene mapping. PLoS One 7:2–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053027
59. Vitte C, Panaud O (2003) Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR retrotransposons in rice Oryza sativa L. Mol Biol Evol 20:528–540. doi:10.1093/molbev/msg055
60. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA et al (2009) Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
61. Wicker T, Robertson JS, Schulze SR et al (2005) The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. Genome Res 15:126–136. doi:10.1101/gr.2438005
62. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A et al (2007) A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet 8:973–982. doi:10.1038/nrg2165
63. Zhang G, Li C, Li Q et al (2014) Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science (80-)346:1311–1320. doi:10.1126/science.1251385
64. Zhou Q, Zhang J, Bachtrog D et al (2014) Complex evolutionary trajectories of sex chromosomes across bird taxa. Science (80-)346:1246338. doi:10.1126/science.1246338