Non-equilibrium dynamics and floral trait interactions shape extant angiosperm diversity

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 283, Issue 1830, 2016, Pages

  O’Meara, Brian C ^a   Smith, Stacey D ^b   Armbruster, W Scott ^c,d,e   Harder, Lawrence D ^f   Hardy, Christopher R ^g   Hileman, Lena C ^h   Hufford, Larry ⁱ   Litt, Amy ^j,k   Magallón, Susana ^l   Smith, Stephen A ^m   Stevens, Peter F ⁿ   Fenster, Charles B ^o   Diggle, Pamela K ^p  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^e NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^g MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

ⁱ WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^k NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^l UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^m UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

ⁿ MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^o SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Diversification; Floral evolution; Flower symmetry; Macroevolution; Non equilibrium; Pollination

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ANCESTRY; ANGIOSPERM; EQUILIBRIUM; EXTINCTION; FLORAL TRAIT; POLLINATION; PREDICTION; SHAPE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SYMMETRY;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANGIOSPERM; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; MARKOV CHAIN; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ANGIOSPERMS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84965111891     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2304     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Barraclough TG, Humphreys AM. 2015 The evolutionary reality of species and higher taxa in plants: a survey of post-modern opinion and evidence. New Phytol. 207, 291-296. (doi:10.1111/nph.13232)
2. Maddison WP. 2006 Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change. Evolution 60, 1743-1746. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00517.x)
3. Nosil P, Mooers AO. 2005 Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59, 2256-2263. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00933.x)
4. Ree RH, Donoghue MJ. 1999 Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in asterid angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 48, 633-641. (doi:10.1080/106351599260201)
5. Rabosky DL, McCune AR. 2010 Reinventing species selection with molecular phylogenies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 68-74. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.002)
6. Jablonski D. 2008 Species selection: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 501-524. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173510)
7. Farrell BD, Dussourd DE, Mitter C. 1991 Escalation of plant defense: do latex and resin canals spur plant diversification. Am. Nat. 138, 881-900. (doi:10.1086/285258)
8. Goldberg EE, Kohn JR, Lande R, Robertson KA, Smith SA, Igic B. 2010 Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330, 493-495. (doi:10.126/science.1194513)
9. Maddison WP, Midford PE, Otto SP. 2007 Estimating a binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56, 701-710. (doi:10.1080/10635150701607033)
10. Gillespie RG. 2013 Adaptive radiation: convergence and non-equilibrium. Curr. Biol. 23, R71-R74. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.052)
11. Magallon S, Gomez-Acevedo S, Sanchez-Reyes LL, Hernandez-Hernandez T. 2015 A metacalibrated time-tree documents the early rise of flowering plant phylogenetic diversity. New Phytol. 207, 437-453. (doi:10.1111/nph.13264)
12. Chartier M, Jabbour F, Gerber S, Mitteroecker P, Sauquet H, von Balthazar M, Staedler Y, Crane PR, Schoenenberger J. 2014 The floral morphospace: a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution. New Phytol. 204, 841-853. (doi:10.1111/nph.12969)
13. Stebbins GL. 1951 Natural selection and the differentiation of angiosperm families. Evolution 5, 299-324. (doi:10.2307/2405676)
14. Sargent RD. 2004 Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 603-608. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2644)
15. Donoghue MJ, Sanderson MJ. 2015 Confluence, synnovation, and depauperons in plant diversification. New Phytol. 207, 260-274. (doi:10.1111/nph.13367)
16. Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C. 2009 Evolution of floral symmetry: a state of the art. Curr. Biol. 332, 219-231. (doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.011)
17. Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1994 Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science 264, 1590-1593. (doi:10.1126/science.264.5165.1590)
18. Cronquist A. 1988 The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Bronx, NY: The New York Botanical Garden.
19. Takhtajan A. 1997 Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20. Armbruster WS, Hansen TF, Pelabon C, Perez-Barrales R, Maad J. 2009 The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns. Ann. Bot.-Lond. 103, 1529-1545. (doi:10.1093/aob/mcp095)
21. Endress PK. 1982 Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 31, 48-52. (doi:10.2307/1220588)
22. Hodges SA, Arnold ML. 1995 Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 343-348. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0215)
23. van der Niet T, Johnson SD. 2012 Phylogenetic evidence for pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 353-361. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.002)
24. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004 Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 375-403. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347)
25. FitzJohn RG. 2012 Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 1084-1092. (doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00234.x)
26. FitzJohn RG, Maddison WP, Otto SP. 2009 Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 58, 595-611. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp067)
27. Smith SA, Beaulieu JM, Donoghue MJ. 2009 Megaphylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 37. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-37)
28. Stamatakis A. 2006 RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446)
29. Chase MW et al. 1993 Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 528-580. (doi:10.2307/2399846)
30. Soltis DE et al. 2000 Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133, 381-461. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2000.tb01588.x)
31. Qiu Y-L et al. 1999 The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404-407. (doi:10.1038/46536)
32. Smith SA, O’Meara BC. 2012 TreePL: divergence time estimation using penalized likelihood for large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 28, 2689-2690. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts492)
33. Citerne H, Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C. 2010 The evolution of floral symmetry. Adv. Bot. Res. 54, 85-137. (doi:10.1016/S0065-2296(10)54003-5)
34. Faegri K, van der Pijl L. 1979 The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
35. Mulcahy DL. 1979 The rise of the angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206, 20-23. (doi:10.1126/science.206.4414.20)
36. Armbruster WS, Debevec EM, Willson MF. 2002 Evolution of syncarpy in angiosperms: theoretical and phylogenetic analyses of the effects of carpel fusion on offspring quantity and quality. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 657-672. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00414.x)
37. Grant V. 1950 The protection of the ovules in flowering plants. Evolution 4, 179-201. (doi:10.2307/2405331)
38. Thompson JN, Pellmyr O. 1992 Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. Ecology 73, 1780-1791. (doi:10.2307/1940029)
39. Kubitzki K. 2004 Flowering plants, dicotyledons: celastrales, oxidales, rosales, cornales, ericales. In Families and genera of vascular plants. (ed K Kubitzki), p. 489. New York, NY: Springer.
40. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 1993 Flora of North America north of Mexico. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. Endress PK. 2001 The flowers in extant basal angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162, 1111-1140. (doi:10.1086/321919)
42. Endress PK, Doyle JA. 2009 Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. Am. J. Bot. 96, 22-66. (doi:10.3732/ajb.0800047)
43. Beaulieu JM, O’Meara BC. In press. Detecting hidden diversification shifts in models of trait-dependent speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw022)
44. Hughes NF, Mcdougall AB, Chapman JL. 1991 Exceptional new record of cretaceous Hauterivian angiospermid pollen from southern England. J. Micropaleontol. 10, 75-82. (doi:10.1144/jm.10.1.75)
45. Brenner GJ. 1996 Evidence of the earliest stage of angiosperm pollen evolution: a paleoequatorial section from Israel. In Flowering plant origin, evolution, and phylogeny (eds DW Taylor, LJ Hickey), pp. 91-115. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
46. Smith SD, Goldberg EE. 2015 Tempo and mode of flower color evolution. Am. J. Bot. 102, 1014-1025. (doi:10.3732/ajb.1500163)
47. Gould SJ. 1990 Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
48. Smith SD. 2016 Pleiotropy and the evolution of floral integration. New Phytol. 209, 80-85. (doi:10.1111/nph.13583)
49. Preston JC, Martinez CC, Hileman LC. 2011 Gradual disintegration of the floral symmetry gene network is implicated in the evolution of a wind-pollination syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2343-2348. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1011361108)
50. Wiens JJ. 2001 Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 517-523. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02217-0)
51. Goldberg EE, Igic B. 2008 On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution. Evolution 62, 2727-2741. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00505.x)
52. Fenster CB, Reynolds RJ, Williams CW, Makowsky R, Dudash MR. 2015 Quantifying hummingbird preference for floral trait combinations: the role of selection on trait interactions in the evolution of pollination syndromes. Evolution 69, 1113-1127. (doi:10.1111/evo.12639)
53. Kay KM, Voelckel C, Yang JY, Hufford L, Kaska DD, Hodges SA. 2006 Floral characters and species diversification. In Ecology and evolution of flowers (eds LD Harder, SCH Barrett), pp. 311-325. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Armbruster WS, Pelabon C, Hansen TF, Bolstad GH. 2009 Macroevolutionary patterns of pollination accuracy: a comparison of three genera. New Phytol. 183, 600-617. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02930.x)
55. Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M. 1998 Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 345-373. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.345)
56. Walker-Larsen J, Harder LD. 2000 The evolution of staminodes in angiosperms: patterns of stamen reduction, loss, and functional re-invention. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1367-1384. (doi:10.2307/2656866)
57. Darwin C. 1862 On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects. London, UK: John Murray.
58. Vogel S. 1996 Christian Konrad Sprengel’s theory of the flower: the cradle of floral ecology. In Flora ecology: studies on floral evolution in animalpollinated plants (eds DG Lloyd, SCH Barrett), pp. 44-62. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
59. Donoghue MJ, Ree RH, Baum DA. 1998 Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sci. 3, 311-317. (doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01278-3)
60. Armbruster WS, Muchhala N. 2009 Associations between floral specialization and species diversity: cause, effect, or correlation? Evol. Ecol. 23, 159-179. (doi:10.1007/s10682-008-9259-z)
61. Maddison WP, FitzJohn RG. 2015 The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters. Syst. Biol. 64, 127-136. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu070)
62. Ng J, Smith SD. 2014 How traits shape trees: new approaches for detecting character state-dependent lineage diversification. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 2035-2045. (doi:10.1111/jeb.12460)
63. Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR. 2011 Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. De Vries H. 1904 Species and varieties: their origin by mutation. Chicago, IL: The Open Court Publishing Company.
65. Phillips PC. 2008 Epistasis -the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 855-867. (doi:10.1038/nrg2452)
66. Wright S. 1931 Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 0097-0159.
67. Givnish TJ et al. 2015 Orchid phylogenomics and multiple drivers of their extraordinary diversification. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 171-180. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1553)
68. Silvestro D, Zizka G, Schulte K. 2014 Disentangling the effects of key innovations on the diversification of Bromelioideae (Bromeliaceae). Evolution 68, 163-175. (doi:10.1111/evo.12236)
69. Rabosky DL, Goldberg EE. 2015 Model inadequacy and mistaken inferences of trait-dependent speciation. Syst. Biol. 64, 340-355. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu131)
70. O’Meara BC. 2012 Evolutionary inferences from phylogenies: a review of methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 43, 267-285. (doi:10.1146/annurevecolsys-110411-160331)
71. Boettiger C, Coop G, Ralph P. 2012 Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods. Evolution 66, 2240-2251. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01574.x)