Patient assessment of diabetes care in a pay-for-performance program

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 183-190

  Chiu, Herng Chia ^a,b   Hsieh, Hui Min ^a   Lin, Yi Chieh ^a   Kuo, Shou Jen ^b   Kao, Hao Yun ^a   Jennifer Yeh, Shu Chuan ^a,c   Chang, Wen Hsin ^d   Hsiao, Pi Jung ^e   Chen, Yao Shen ^f   Lin, Shoei Loong ^g   Lo, Gin Ho ^h   Ker, Chen Guo ⁱ   Hung, Yu Han ⁱ   Cheng, Hsien An ⁱ   Chou, Tiang Hong ^j   Chou, Sze Yuan ^k   Wang, Jao Hsien ^l   Wang, Chien Fu ^m  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANGHUA CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d MACKAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^f KAOHSIUNG VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^g Choninn Healthcare System   (Taiwan)

^h I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

ⁱ YUAN'S GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^j MENNONITE CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^k CHENG CHING GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^l Jiannren Hospital   (Taiwan)

^m Taitung Hospital   (Taiwan)

more..

Author keywords

Chronic care model; Diabetes care; PACIC; Patient centered care; Pay for performance

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; DISEASE ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC ILLNESS CARE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF REPORT; TAIWAN; AGED; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; REIMBURSEMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TAIWAN;

EID: 84964769084     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv120     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gillam SJ, Siriwardena AN, Steel N. Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:461-8.
2. Kruse GB, Polsky D, Stuart EA et al. The impact of hospital pay-for-performance on hospital and medicare costs. Health Serv Res 2012;47:2118-36.
3. Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:247.
4. Campbell SM, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E et al. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. New Eng J Med 2009;361:368-78.
5. Greene J. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia. Health Serv Res 2013;48:1415-32.
6. Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H et al. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. The New England J Med 2006;355:375-84.
7. Chien AT, Li Z, Rosenthal MB. Improving timely childhood immunizations through pay for performance in Medicaid-managed care. Health Serv Res 2010;45(6 Pt 2):1934-47.
8. Chien AT, Eastman D, Li Z et al. Impact of a pay for performance program to improve diabetes care in the safety net. Prev Med 2012;55(Suppl):S80-5.
9. Ryan AM. Effects of the premier hospital quality incentive demonstration on medicare patient mortality and cost. Health Serv Res 2009;44:821-42.
10. Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER et al. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc 2007;297:2373-80.
11. Press I, Fullam F. Patient satisfaction in pay for performance programs. Qual Manage Health Care 2011;20:110-5.
12. Roland M, Elliott M, Lyratzopoulos G et al. Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England. BMJ 2009;339:b3851.
13. Calsbeek H, Ketelaar NA, Faber MJ et al. Performance measurements in diabetes care: the complex task of selecting quality indicators. Int J Qual Health Care: J Int Soc Qual Health Care/ISQua 2013;25:704-9.
14. Cheng SH, Lee TT, Chen CC. A longitudinal examination of a pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: evidence from a natural experiment. Med Care 2012;50:109.
15. Lai CL, Hou YH. The association of clinical guideline adherence and pay-for-performance among patients with diabetes. J Chin Med Assoc 2013;76:102-7.
16. Vaghela P, Ashworth M, Schofield P et al. Population intermediate outcomes of diabetes under pay-for-performance incentives in England from 2004 to 2008. Diabetes Care 2009;32:427-9.
17. Chen PC, Lee YC, Kuo RN. Differences in patient reports on the quality of care in a diabetes pay-for-performance program between 1 year enrolled and newly enrolled patients. Int J Qual Health Care: J Int Soc Qual Health Care/ISQua. 2012;24:189-96.
18. Campbell SM, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D et al. Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:499-506.
19. Lee TT, Cheng SH, Chen CC et al. A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: a preliminary assessment. Am J Managed Care 2010;16:65-9.
20. Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, Valderas JM et al. Recorded quality of primary care for patients with diabetes in England before and after the introduction of a financial incentive scheme: a longitudinal observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:53-64.
21. Chen TT, Chung KP, Lin I et al. The unintended consequence of diabetes mellitus pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan: are patients with more comorbidities or more severe conditions likely to be excluded from the P4P program? Health Serv Res 2011;46(1 Pt 1):47-60.
22. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE et al. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res 2002;37:791-820.
23. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996;74:511-44.
24. Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J et al. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Int Med 1997;127:1097-102.
25. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J et al. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 2005;43:436-44.
26. Szecsenyi J, Rosemann T, Joos S et al. German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1150-4.
27. Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE et al. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:77-80.
28. Vrijhoef HJM, Berbee R, Wagner EH et al. Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey: identification, selection and application of most appropriate instruments. Health Expect 2009;12: 417-29.
29. Wensing M, Van Lieshout J, Jung H et al. The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire in the Netherlands: a validation study in rural general practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:182.
30. Aragones A, Schaefer EW, Stevens D et al. Validation of the Spanish translation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5:A113.
31. Carryer J, Budge C, Hansen C et al. Modifying the PACIC to assess provision of chronic illness care: an exploratory study with primary health care nurses. J Prim Health Care 2010;1:118-23.
32. Gugiu C, Coryn CLS, Applegate B. Structure and measurement properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument. J Eval Clin Pract 2010;16:509-16.
33. Steinhaeuser J, Goetz K, Ose D et al. Applicability of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) instrument in Germany resulting in a new questionnaire: questionnaire of chronic illness care in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:164.
34. Group Health Research Institute. PACIC survey by The MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation. http://wwwimprovingchroniccareorg/indexphpp=PACIC_surveys=36 (2 April 2014, date last accessed).
35. WHO. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. 2014 http ://wwwwhoint/substance:abuse/research_tools/translation/en/ (2 April 2014, date last accessed).
36. Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011;6:e20476.
37. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci 1963;9:458-67.
38. IOM. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
39. Kontopantelis E, Roland M, Reeves D. Patient experience of access to primary care: identification of predictors in a national patient survey. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11:61.
40. Young GJ, Meterko M, Beckman H et al. Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22:872-6.