Differences in patient reports on the quality of care in a diabetes pay-for-performance program between 1 year enrolled and newly enrolled patients

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 189-196

  Chen, Pei Ching ^a   Lee, Yue Chune ^a   Kuo, Raymond Nienchen ^b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Pay for performance; Quality of health care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETES PAY FOR PERFORMANCE HEALTH PROGRAM; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOOT CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; TAIWAN; TELEMONITORING; TREATMENT DURATION;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; TAIWAN;

EID: 84863276890     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr091     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care-a major experiment in the United kingdom. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1448-54.
2. Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song HR et al. Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:127-41.
3. Dudley RA. Pay-for-performance research: how to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know. JAMA 2005;294:1821-3.
4. Iglehart JK. Linking compensation to quality-medicare payments to physicians. N Engl J Med 2005;353:870-2.
5. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z et al. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA 2005;294:1788-93.
6. McNamara P. Quality-based payment: six case examples. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:357-62.
7. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG. What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:135-57.
8. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T et al. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med 2006;145:265-72.
9. Greene SE, Nash DB. Pay for performance: an overview of the literature. Am J Med Qual 2009;24:140-63.
10. Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:247.
11. Chang CH, Shau WY, Jiang YD et al. Type 2 diabetes prevalence and incidence among adults in Taiwan during 1999-2004: a national health insurance data set study. Diabet Med 2010;27:636-43.
12. Chang K. Comorbidities, quality of life and patients' willingness to pay for a cure for type 2 diabetes in Taiwan. Public Health 2010;124:284-94.
13. Zitter M. A new paradigm in health care delivery: disease management. In: Todd WE, Nash D (eds). Disease Management: A Systems Approach to Improving Patient Outcomes. Chicago: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 1-25.
14. Chiou ST, Lin HD, Yu NC et al. An initial assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing diabetes shared care system in Taiwan-some experiences from I-Lan County. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001;54(Suppl. 1):S67-73.
15. Lee TT, Cheng SH, Chen CC et al. A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: a preliminary assessment. Am J Manag Care 2010;16:65-9.
16. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613-9.
17. D'Agostino RB, Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265-81.
18. Parsons LS, ed. Performing a 1:N case-control match on propensity score. In: Proceedings of the 29th SAS Users Group International (SUGI) Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2004.
19. Austin PC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1128-35.
20. Diggle P. Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd edn. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
21. Li CL, Lin NY, Wang HH et al. A population study on changes in diabetes self-care behaviors in Taiwan between 2001 and 2005. Prev Med 2010;50:308-9.
22. Gene-Badia J, Escaramis-Babiano G, Sans-Corrales M et al. Impact of economic incentives on quality of professional life and on end-user satisfaction in primary care. Health Policy 2007;80:2-10.
23. Rodriguez HP, von Glahn T, Rogers WH et al. Organizational and market influences on physician performance on patient experience measures. Health Serv Res 2009;44:880-901.
24. Campbell SM, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D et al. Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:499-506.
25. Baruch Y. Response rate in academic studies-a comparative analysis. Hum Relations 1999;52:421-38.
26. Sitzia J, Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:311-7.