Comprehensive feedback on trainee surgeons’ non-technical skills

International Journal of Medical Education

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages 4-11

  Spanager, Lene ^a   Dieckmann, Peter ^a   Beier Holgersen, Randi ^b   Rosenberg, Jacob ^c   Oestergaard, Doris ^a  

^a Danish Institute for Medical Simulation   (Denmark)

^b HILLERØD HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Communication; Decision making; Feedback; Leadership; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MANPOWER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGEON; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FACULTY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; SOCIAL SKILLS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; SURGEONS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84964694417     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20426372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5116/ijme.54b4.2196     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher. 2011;33 (6):478-485.
2. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Medical Education. 2010;44(1):101-108.
3. Mann K, Van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Academic Medicine. 2011;86 (9):1120-1127.
4. Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Medical Education. 2008;42(2):189-197.
5. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simulation in Healthcare. 2006;1(1):49-55.
6. Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Arora S. Actual vs perceived performance debriefing in surgery: practice far from perfect. American Journal of Surgery. 2013;205(4):434-440.
7. Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Paige J, Paragi-Gururaja R, Nestel D, Arora S, et al. Identifying best practice guidelines for debriefing in surgery: a tri-continental study. American Journal of Surgery. 2012;203(4):523-529.
8. Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Medical Teacher. 2012;34(10):787-791.
9. Dieckmann P, Krage R. Simulation and psychology; creating, recognizing and using learning opportunities. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2013; 26(6):714-720.
10. Qadan L, Al-Özairi E, Ayed A, Huang G. Avoiding honest feedback: Discordance between formal evaluations and candid assessments of Kuwaiti PBL students. Medical Teacher. 2013;35(6):459-464.
11. Grantcharov TP, Schulze S, Kristiansen VB. The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room. Surgical Endoscopy. 2007;21(12):2240-2243.
12. Kruglikova I, Grantcharov TP, Drewes AM, Funch-Jensen P. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2010;59(2):181-185.
13. Hamad GG, Brown MT, Clavijo-Alvarez JA. Postoperative video debriefing reduces technical errors in laparoscopic surgery. American Journal of Surgery. 2007;194(1):110-114.
14. McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A, Dale T, Hirst G, Catchpole K. The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2009;18(2):109-115.
15. Sevdalis N, Hull L, Birnbach DJ. Improving patient safety in the operating theatre and perioperative care: obstacles, interventions, and priorities for accelerating progress. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012;109(Suppl 1):i3-i16.
16. Crossley J, Marriott J, Purdie H, Beard JD. Prospective observational study to evaluate NOTSS (Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons) for assessing trainees’ non-technical performance in the operating theatre. British Journal of Surgery. 2011;98(7):1010-1020.
17. Yule S, Flin R, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G, Paterson-Brown S. Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery. 2008;32 (4):548-556.
18. Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E, Kneebone R, Sevdalis N. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011;212(2):234-243.e1-5.
19. Danish Surgical Society. Curriculum for specialist education in surgery. Danish Health and Medicines Authority; 2008 [Cited 19 September 2014]; Available from: https://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/da/uddannelse-autorisation/special-og-videreuddannelse/laege/maalbeskrivelser-i-speciallaegeuddannelsen/~/media/DD5F013C2ED94D339F9E0DDEF930762F.ashx.
20. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D. Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Medical Education. 2006;40(11):1098-1104.
21. Spanager L, Lyk-Jensen HT, Dieckmann P, Wettergren A, Rosenberg J, Oestergaard D. Customization of a tool to assess Danish surgeons’ nontechnical skills in the operating room. Danish Medical Journal. 2012;59 (11):A4526.
22. Spanager L, Beier-Holgersen R, Dieckmann P, Konge L, Rosenberg J, Oestergaard D. Reliable assessment of general surgeons’ non-technical skills based on video-recordings of patient simulated scenarios. American Journal of Surgery. 2013;206(5):810-817.
23. Spanager L, Konge L, Dieckmann P, Beier-Holgersen R, Rosenberg J, Oestergaard D. Assessing trainee surgeons’ non-technical skills: five cases are sufficient for reliable assessments. Journal of Surgical Education. 2014;In press.
24. Spanager L, Oestergaard D, Dieckmann P, Lyk- Jensen HT. NOTSSdk user guide. A tool for structuring observation and feedback on trainee surgeons’ non-technical skills. Danish Institute for Medical Simulation; 2013 [Cited 19 September 2014]; Available from: http://www.regionh.dk/dims/menu/NOTSSdk.
25. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277-1288.
26. Parker SH, Yule S, Flin R, McKinley A. Surgeons’ leadership in the operating room: an observational study. American Journal of Surgery. 2012;204(3):347-354.
27. Dieckmann P, Molin Friis S, Lippert A, Oestergaard D. The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice. Medical Teacher. 2009;31(7):e287-294.
28. Roberts NK, Williams RG, Kim MJ, Dunnington GL. The briefing, intraoperative teaching, debriefing model for teaching in the operating room. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2009;208(2):299-303.
29. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, Monuteaux M, Fleegler E, Cheng A, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simulation in Health Care. 2012;7(5):288-294.
30. Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J, Nestel D, Runnacles J, Hull L, et al. Objective structured assessment of debriefing: bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2012;256(6):982-988.
31. Steinwachs B. How to facilitate a debriefing. Simulation & Gaming. 1992;23(2):186-195.
32. Kihlgren P, Spanager L, Dieckmann P. Investigating novice doctors’ reflections in debriefings after simulation scenarios. Medical Teacher. 2014;In press.
33. Galbraith RM. Got feedback? Medical Education. 2013;47(3):224-225.
34. Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Arora S. Actual vs. perceived performance debriefing in surgery: practice far from perfect. American Journal of Surgery. 2013;205(4):434-440.
35. Hull L, Arora S, Symons NRA, Jalil R, Darzi A, Vincent C, et al. Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: national guidelines on program requirements. Annals of Surgery. 2013;258(2):370-375.