Avoiding honest feedback: Discordance between formal evaluations and candid assessments of Kuwaiti PBL students

Medical Teacher

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 459-464

  Qadan, Laila ^a   Al Ozairi, Ebaa ^a,b   Ayed, Adel ^a   Huang, Grace ^c,d  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

^b DASMAN DIABETES INSTITUTE   (Kuwait)

^c Shapiro Institute for Education and Research   (United States)

^d Beth Israel Deaconess ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; KUWAIT; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARD; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; KUWAIT; MALE; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84878270288     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.774337     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Archer JC. 2010. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ 44: 101-108.
2. Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, Mayforth R, Quin J, Williams RG, Dunnington G. 2006. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomized controlled trial. Med Educ 40: 746-749. (Pubitemid 44134135)
3. Bogo M, Regehr C, Power R, Regehr G. 2007. When values collide: Field instructors' experiences of providing feedback and evaluating competence. Clin Superv 26: 99-117.
4. Brett JF, Atwater LE. 2001. 360 Degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psychol 86: 930-942.
5. Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. 1999. Teaching compassion and respect. Attending physicians' responses to problematic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med 14: 49-55. (Pubitemid 29056701)
6. Cleland JA, Knight LV, Rees CE, Tracey S, Bond CM. 2008. Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Med Educ 42: 800-809. (Pubitemid 352019171)
7. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. 2005. Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med 80(10):S84-S87. (Pubitemid 41383282)
8. Ende J. 1983. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 250: 777-781. (Pubitemid 13039569)
9. FitzGerald M, Schumacher D. 2012. Motivational consequences that affect the timeliness and candidness of resident evaluations. Open Med Educ J 5: 17-21.
10. Guba EG. 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational resources information center annual review paper. 29: 75-91.
11. Hatala R, Norman GR. 1999. In-training evaluation during an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med 74:S118-S120. (Pubitemid 29493358)
12. Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach 33: 206-214.
13. Taylor D, Miflin B. 2008. AMEE Guide No 36: Problem-based learning: Where are we now? Med Teach 30: 742-763.
14. Thomas JD, Arnold RM. 2011. Giving feedback. J Palliat Med 14(2): 233-239.
15. Villanova P, Bernardin HJ, Dahmus SA, Sims RL. 1993. Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educ Psychol Meas 53: 789-799.