Nanotechnology: A New Opportunity in Plant Sciences

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 699-712

  Wang, Peng ^a,b   Lombi, Enzo ^c   Zhao, Fang Jie ^a   Kopittke, Peter M ^b  

^a NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

agriculture nanotechnology; nanoparticles; plant biotechnology; plant nanotoxicology

Indexed keywords

NANOPARTICLE;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84964570393     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. 1 Nel, A., et al. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311 (2006), 622–627.
2. 2 Gu, Z., et al. Tailoring nanocarriers for intracellular protein delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (2011), 3638–3655.
3. 3 Nair, R., et al. Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci. 179 (2010), 154–163.
4. 4 Scheringer, M., Nanoecotoxicology: environmental risks of nanomaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (2008), 322–323.
5. 5 Li, Z-Z., et al. Study of UV-shielding properties of novel porous hollow silica nanoparticle carriers for avermectin. Pest Manag. Sci. 63 (2007), 241–246.
6. 6 Barik, T.K., et al. Nanosilica: from medicine to pest control. Parasitol. Res. 103 (2008), 253–258.
7. 7 Goldwasser, Y., et al. Control of Orobanche crenata and Orobanche aegyptiaca in parsley. Crop Protect. 22 (2003), 295–305.
8. 8 DeRosa, M.C., et al. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat. Nanotechnol., 5, 2010, 91.
9. 9 Hossain, K.Z., et al. Adsorption of urease on PE-MCM-41 and its catalytic effect on hydrolysis of urea. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 62 (2008), 42–50.
10. 10 Liu, R., Lal, R., Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Sci. Rep., 4, 2014, 5686.
11. 11 Torney, F., et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2 (2007), 295–300.
12. 12 Martin-Ortigosa, S., et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-mediated intracellular Cre protein delivery for maize genome editing via loxP site excision. Plant Physiol. 164 (2014), 537–547.
13. 13 Hussain, H., et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a biomolecule delivery vehicle in plants. J. Nano. Res. 15 (2013), 1–15.
14. 14 Liu, Q., et al. Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett. 9 (2009), 1007–1010.
15. 15 Serag, M.F., et al. Trafficking and subcellular localization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in plant cells. ACS Nano 5 (2011), 493–499.
16. 16 Wu, J., et al. An improved particle bombardment for the generation of transgenic plants by direct immobilization of releasable Tn5 transposases onto gold particles. Plant Mol. Biol. 77 (2011), 117–127.
17. 17 Martin-Ortigosa, S., et al. Parameters affecting the efficient delivery of mesoporous silica nanoparticle materials and gold nanorods into plant tissues by the biolistic method. Small 8 (2012), 413–422.
18. 18 Huang, X., et al. Magnetic virus-like nanoparticles in N. benthamiana plants: a new paradigm for environmental and agronomic biotechnological research. ACS Nano 5 (2011), 4037–4045.
19. 19 González-Melendi, P., et al. Nanoparticles as smart treatment-delivery systems in plants: assessment of different techniques of microscopy for their visualization in plant tissues. Ann. Bot. 101 (2008), 187–195.
20. 20 Corredor, E., et al. Nanoparticle penetration and transport in living pumpkin plants: in situ subcellular identification. BMC Plant Biol., 9, 2009, 45.
21. 21 Etxeberria, E., et al. Fluid phase endocytic uptake of artificial nano-spheres and fluorescent quantum dots by sycamore cultured cells: evidence for the distribution of solutes to different intracellular compartments. Plant Signal. Behav. 1 (2006), 196–200.
22. 22 Liu, J., et al. Preparation of fluorescence starch-nanoparticle and its application as plant transgenic vehicle. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 15 (2008), 768–773.
23. 23 Martin-Ortigosa, S., et al. Gold functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticle mediated protein and DNA codelivery to plant cells via the biolistic method. Adv. Fun. Mater. 22 (2012), 3576–3582.
24. 24 Serag, M.F., et al. Functional platform for controlled subcellular distribution of carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 5 (2011), 9264–9270.
25. 25 Medintz, I.L., et al. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. Nat. Mater. 4 (2005), 435–446.
26. 26 Michalet, X., et al. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 307 (2005), 538–544.
27. 27 Hischemoller, A., et al. In-vivo imaging of the uptake of upconversion nanoparticles by plant roots. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 5 (2009), 278–284.
28. 28 Koo, Y., et al. Fluorescence reports intact quantum dot uptake into roots and translocation to leaves of arabidopsis thaliana and subsequent ingestion by insect herbivores. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 626–632.
29. 29 Zhu, H., et al. Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J. Environ. Monit. 10 (2008), 713–717.
30. 30 Lin, S., et al. Uptake, translocation, and transmission of carbon nanomaterials in rice plants. Small 5 (2009), 1128–1132.
31. 31 Eichert, T., Goldbach, H.E., Equivalent pore radii of hydrophilic foliar uptake routes in stomatous and astomatous leaf surfaces: further evidence for a stomatal pathway. Physiol. Plant. 132 (2008), 491–502.
32. 32 Ma, X., et al. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci. Total Environ. 408 (2010), 3053–3061.
33. 33 Dietz, K-J., Herth, S., Plant nanotoxicology. Trends Plant Sci. 16 (2011), 582–589.
34. 34 Aubert, T., et al. Root uptake and phytotoxicity of nanosized molybdenum octahedral clusters. J. Hazard. Mater. 219-220 (2012), 111–118.
35. 35 Šamaj, J., et al. Endocytosis, actin cytoskeleton, and signaling. Plant Physiol. 135 (2004), 1150–1161.
36. 36 Lucas, W.J., Lee, J.Y., Plasmodesmata as a supracellular control network in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5 (2004), 712–726.
37. 37 Zhai, G., et al. Transport of gold nanoparticles through plasmodesmata and precipitation of gold ions in woody poplar. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 1 (2014), 146–151.
38. 38 Schwab, F., et al. Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants–critical review. Nanotoxicology 0 (2015), 1–22.
39. 2 alizarin red s nanoconjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nano Lett. 10 (2010), 2296–2302.
40. 40 Navarro, E., et al. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), 8959–8964.
41. 41 Eckhardt, S., et al. Nanobio silver: its interactions with peptides and bacteria, and its uses in medicine. Chem. Rev. 113 (2013), 4708–4754.
42. 42 Brayner, R., et al. Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine zno nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett. 6 (2006), 866–870.
43. 2 nanoparticles in lettuce crop after foliar exposure. J. Hazard. Mater. 273 (2014), 17–26.
44. 2 nanoparticles in wheat (Triticum aestivum spp.): influence of diameter and crystal phase. Sci. Total Environ. 431 (2012), 197–208.
45. 2S-NPs) are taken up by plants and are phytotoxic. Nanotoxicology 9 (2015), 1041–1049.
46. 46 Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Plant Physiology. 2006, Sinauer Associates.
47. 47 Miralles, P., et al. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 9224–9239.
48. 48 Judy, J.D., Bertsch, P.M., Bioavailability, toxicity, and fate of manufactured nanomaterials in terrestrial ecosystems. Advances in Agronomy 123 (2014), 1–64.
49. 49 Cañas, J.E., et al. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27 (2008), 1922–1931.
50. 2 on photosynthesis of spinach chloroplasts under different light illumination. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 119 (2007), 68–76.
51. 2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 110 (2006), 179–190.
52. 52 Lei, Z., et al. Antioxidant stress is promoted by nano-anatase in spinach chloroplasts under UV-B radiation. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 121 (2008), 69–79.
53. 53 Lombi, E., et al. Evidence for effects of manufactured nanomaterials on crops is inconclusive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 2012, E3336.
54. 54 Judy, J.D., et al. Bioaccumulation of gold nanomaterials by Manduca sexta through dietary uptake of surface contaminated plant tissue. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 12672–12678.
55. 55 Unrine, J.M., et al. Trophic transfer of Au nanoparticles from soil along a simulated terrestrial food chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 9753–9760.
56. 56 Hawthorne, J., et al. Particle-size dependent accumulation and trophic transfer of cerium oxide through a terrestrial food chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014), 13102–13109.
57. 3 does not depend on particle size. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 11866–11874.
58. 58 Asli, S., Neumann, P.M., Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide nanoparticles can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport. Plant Cell Environ. 32 (2009), 577–584.
59. 59 Shen, C.X., et al. Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single-wall carbon nanotubes. Am. J. Bot. 97 (2010), 1602–1609.
60. 2, heat shock protein, and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano 6 (2012), 9615–9622.
61. 61 Nel, A.E., et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 8 (2009), 543–557.
62. 62 Atha, D.H., et al. Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 1819–1827.
63. 63 Sharifi, S., et al. Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (2012), 2323–2343.
64. 64 Slomberg, D.L., Schoenfisch, M.H., Silica nanoparticle phytotoxicity to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 10247–10254.
65. 65 Judy, J.D., et al. Bioavailability of gold nanomaterials to plants: importance of particle size and surface coating. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 8467–8474.
66. 66 Van Hoecke, K., et al. Ecotoxicity of silica nanoparticles to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata: importance of surface area. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27 (2008), 1948–1957.
67. 67 Auffan, M., et al. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 (2009), 634–641.
68. 68 Cha, S.H., et al. Shape-dependent biomimetic inhibition of enzyme by nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. ACS Nano 9 (2015), 9097–9105.
69. 69 Wang, P., et al. Fate of ZnO nanoparticles in soils and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 13822–13830.
70. 70 Onelli, E., et al. Clathrin-dependent and independent endocytic pathways in tobacco protoplasts revealed by labelling with charged nanogold. J. Expt. Bot. 59 (2008), 3051–3068.
71. 71 Zhu, Z.J., et al. Effect of surface charge on the uptake and distribution of gold nanoparticles in four plant species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 12391–12398.
72. 72 Zhai, G., et al. Charge, size, and cellular selectivity for multiwall carbon nanotubes by maize and soybean. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 7380–7390.
73. 73 Yang, X., et al. Mechanism of silver nanoparticle toxicity is dependent on dissolved silver and surface coating in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 1119–1127.
74. 74 Puzyn, T., et al. Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 (2011), 175–178.
75. 75 Fourches, D., et al. Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. ACS Nano 4 (2010), 5703–5712.
76. 76 Zhang, H., et al. Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. ACS Nano 6 (2012), 4349–4368.
77. 77 Xia, X.R., et al. An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 (2010), 671–675.
78. 78 Yang, K., Ma, Y.Q., Computer simulation of the translocation of nanoparticles with different shapes across a lipid bilayer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 (2010), 579–583.
79. 79 Pogodin, S., Baulin, V.A., Can a carbon nanotube pierce through a phospholipid bilayer?. ACS Nano 4 (2010), 5293–5300.
80. 80 Zhao, F.J., et al. Imaging element distribution and speciation in plant cells. Trends Plant Sci. 19 (2014), 183–192.
81. 81 Malysheva, A., et al. Bridging the divide between human and environmental nanotoxicology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 (2015), 835–844.
82. 82 Lombi, E., Susini, J., Synchrotron-based techniques for plant and soil science: opportunities, challenges and future perspectives. Plant Soil 320 (2009), 1–35.
83. 83 de Jonge, N., et al. Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (2009), 2159–2164.
84. 84 Wang, L., et al. Rare earth elements activate endocytosis in plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (2014), 12936–12941.
85. 85 Lin, C., et al. Studies on toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on Arabidopsis T87 suspension cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 170 (2009), 578–583.
86. 86 Lombi, E., et al. In situ analysis of metal(loid)s in plants: State of the art and artefacts. Environ. Exp. Bot. 72 (2011), 3–17.
87. 87 Wang, L., et al. Use of synchrotron radiation-analytical techniques to reveal chemical origin of silver-nanoparticle cytotoxicity. ACS Nano 9 (2015), 6532–6547.
88. 88 Audinot, J-N., et al. Identification and localization of nanoparticles in tissues by mass spectrometry. Surf. Interface Anal. 45 (2013), 230–233.
89. 89 Kempen, P.J., et al. Advanced characterization techniques for nanoparticles for cancer research: Applications of SEM and nanoSIMS for locating Au nanoparticles in cells. Mater Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1569 (2013), 157–163.
90. 90 Georgantzopoulou, A., et al. Ag nanoparticles: size- and surface-dependent effects on model aquatic organisms and uptake evaluation with NanoSIMS. Nanotoxicology 7 (2012), 1168–1178.
91. 91 Baalousha, M., et al. Flow field-flow fractionation for the analysis and characterization of natural colloids and manufactured nanoparticles in environmental systems: a critical review. J. Chromatogr. 1218 (2011), 4078–4103.
92. 92 Kammer, F.v.d, et al. Separation and characterization of nanoparticles in complex food and environmental samples by field-flow fractionation. Trends Anal. Chem. 30 (2011), 425–436.
93. 93 Dan, Y., et al. Characterization of gold nanoparticle uptake by tomato plants using enzymatic extraction followed by single-particle inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 3007–3014.
94. 94 Tasciotti, E., et al. Mesoporous silicon particles as a multistage delivery system for imaging and therapeutic applications. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (2008), 151–157.
95. 95 Li, Z., et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles with pH-sensitive nanovalves for delivery of moxifloxacin provide improved treatment of lethal pneumonic tularemia. ACS Nano 9 (2015), 10778–10789.
96. 96 Paris, J.L., et al. Polymer-grafted mesoporous silica nanoparticles as ultrasound-responsive drug carriers. ACS Nano 9 (2015), 11023–11033.