Beyond Self-Reports: Using Eye Tracking to Measure Topic and Style Differences in Attention to Social Media Content

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 10, Issue 2-3, 2016, Pages 149-164

  Vraga, Emily ^a   Bode, Leticia ^b   Troller Renfree, Sonya ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964539463     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. M.Anderson, (2015). More Americans are using social media to connect with politicians. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/19/more-americans-are-using-social-media-to-connect-with-politicians/
2. E.Bakshy,, S.Messing,, & L.Adamic, (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.
3. M.Barthel,, E.Shearer,, J.Gottfried,, & A.Mitchell, (2015). The evolving role of news on Twitter and Facebook. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/the-evolving-role-of-news-on-twitter-and-facebook/
4. L.Bode, (2012). Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), 352–369. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.709045
5. L.Bode, (2015). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
6. L.Bode,, E.K.Vraga,, P.Borah,, & D.V.Shah, (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–429. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048
7. N.M.Bradburn,, L.Rips,, & S.Shevell, (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science, 236, 157–161. doi:10.1126/science.3563494
8. J.Bryant,, S.Thompson,, & B.Finklea, (2012). Fundamentals of media effects (2nd ed.). Waveland Press, Inc. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
9. M.Burke,, C.Marlow,, & T.Lento, (2010, April). Social network activity and social well-being. CHI ’10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Social Computing, pp. 1909–1912. Atlanta, GA.
10. T.J.Buschman,, & E.K.Miller, (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science, 315(5820), 1860–1862. doi:10.1126/science.1138071
11. J.Cho,, D.V.Shah,, J.M.McLeod,, D.M.McLeod,, R.M.Scholl,, & M.R.Gotlieb, (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88. doi:10.1111/comt.2009.19.issue-1
12. J.Constine, (2014). American users spend an average of 40 minutes per day on Facebook. TechCrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/23/facebook-usage-time/
13. B.B.Cooper, (2013). 7 Powerful Facebook statistics you should know about. Fast Company. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/3022301/work-smart/7-powerful-facebook-statistics-you-should-know-about
14. A.Duchowski, (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (Vol. 373). London, UK: Springer Science & Business Media.
15. N.B.Ellison,, C.Steinfield,, & C.Lampe, (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/jcmc.2007.12.issue-4
16. N.B.Ellison,, C.Steinfield,, & C.Lampe, (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi:10.1177/1461444810385389
17. W.P.Eveland,, Jr., & S.Dunwoody, (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load?: Learning from the web versus print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48–78. doi:10.1177/009365001028001002
18. W.P.Eveland,, Jr., K.Marton,, & M.Seo, (2004). Moving beyond ‘just the facts’: The influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Communication Research, 31, 82–108. doi:10.1177/0093650203260203
19. Facebook. (2015). Stats. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
20. L.R.Frey,, C.H.Botan,, & G.L.Kreps, (2000). Investigating Communication (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21. R.K.Garrett, (2013). Selective exposure: New methods and new directions. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 247–256. doi:10.1080/19312458.2013.835796
22. S.Gearhart,, & W.Zhang, (2014). Gay bullying and online opinion expression: Testing spiral of silence in the social media environment. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 18–36. doi:10.1177/0894439313504261
23. K.Gidlof,, N.Holmberg,, & H.Sandberg, (2012). The use of eye-tracking and retrospective interviews to study teenagers’ exposure to online advertising. Visual Communication, 11(3), 329–345. doi:10.1177/1470357212446412
24. H.Gil de Zúñiga,, N.Jung,, & S.Valenzuela, (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
25. T.Gillespie, (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T.Gillespie, P.Boczkowski, & K.Foot (Ed.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. N.D.Glenn,, & M.Grimes, (1968). Aging, voting, and political interest. American Sociological Review, 33(4), 563–575. doi:10.2307/2092441
27. C.J.Glynn,, M.E.Huge,, & L.H.Hoffman, (2012). All the news that’s fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 113–119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.017
28. D.J.Graham,, J.L.Orquin,, & V.H.Visschers, (2012). Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy, 37(4), 378–382. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.004
29. A.Hermida,, F.Fletcher,, D.Korell,, & D.Logan, (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13, 815–824. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
30. S.M.Jang,, H.Lee,, & Y.J.Park, (2014). The more friends, the less political talk? Predictors of Facebook discussions among college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17, 271–275. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0477
31. J.M.Jones, (2014, March 28). Young Americans’ affinity for democratic party has grown: majority have consistently aligned with democratic party since 2006. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/168125/young-americans-affinity-democratic-party-grown.aspx
32. R.Junco, (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58, 162–171. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004
33. R.Junco, (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 626–631. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007
34. R.Junco,, G.Heibergert,, & E.Loken, (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119–132. doi:10.1111/jca.2011.27.issue-2
35. Y.Kim, (2011). The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 971–977. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001
36. C.Klimmt,, P.Vorderer,, & U.Ritterfeld, (2007). Interactivity and generalizability: New media, new challenges. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 169–179. doi:10.1080/19312450701434961
37. S.Kruikemeier,, G.van Noort,, R.Vliegenthart,, & C.H.de Vreese, (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28, 53–66. doi:10.1177/0267323112464837
38. Z.Kunda, (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
39. A.Lang, (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. doi:10.1111/jcom.2006.56.issue-s1
40. S.Leckner, (2012). Presentation factors affecting reading behaviour in readers of newspaper media: An eye-tracking perspective. Visual Communication, 11(2), 163–184. doi:10.1177/1470357211434029
41. A.Lenhart, (2015). Teens, technology and friendships: Videogames, social media and mobile phones play an integral role in how teens meet and interact with friends. Pew Internet, Science, & Tech. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/06/teens-technology-and-friendships/
42. T.Macafee, (2013). Some of these things are not like the others: Examining motivations and political predispositions among political Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2766–2775. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.019
43. M.Mancas, (2009). Relative influence of bottom-up and top-down attention. In L. Paletta & J.K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Attention in cognitive systems (pp. 212–226). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
44. K.A.Markus, (2012). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling by Rex B. Kline. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 509–512. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.687667
45. S.Messing,, & S.J.Westwood, (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
46. A.Mitchell,, J.Gottfried,, & K.E.Matsa, (2015). How Millennials, Gen Xers and Boomers get political news. Pew Research Center: Journalism and Media. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news/
47. A.Mitchell,, & D.Page, (2013). The role of news on Facebook: Common yet Incidental. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/files/2013/10/facebook_news_10-24-2013.pdf
48. M.G.Muller,, A.Kappas,, & B.Olk, (2012). Perceiving press photography: A new integrative model, combining iconology with psychophysiological and eye-tracking methods. Visual Communication, 11(3), 307–328. doi:10.1177/1470357212446410
49. Nielsen. (2010). Social networks, blogs now account for one in every four and a half minutes online. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2010/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online.html
50. R.K.Nielsen,, & K.C.Schrøder, (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news. Digital Journalism, 1–18. doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.872420
51. A.Oeldorf-Hirsch,, & S.S.Sundar, (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.024
52. B.Pan,, H.A.Hembrooke,, G.K.Gay,, L.A.Granka,, M.K.Feusner,, & J.K.Newman, (2004, March). The determinants of web page viewing behavior: An eye tracking study. Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, ACM, pp. 147–154. San Antonio, TX.
53. E.Pariser, (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
54. Pew. (2012). In changing news landscape, even television is vulnerable. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/in-changing-news-landscape-even-television-is-vulnerable/
55. M.Prior, (2009a). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. The Journal of Politics, 71, 893–908. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090781
56. M.Prior, (2009b). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 130–143. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp002
57. J.Raacke,, & J.Bonds-Raacke, (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056
58. L.Rainie,, A.Smith,, K.L.Schlozman,, H.Brady,, & S.Verba, (2012). Social media and political engagement. Pew Interent and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SocialMediaAndPoliticalEngagement_PDF.pdf
59. A.M.Rubin, (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 67–77. doi:10.1111/jcom.1984.34.issue-3
60. A.M.Rubin, (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J.Bryant, & D.Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 525–548). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
62. N.Schwarz,, & D.Oyserman, (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 127–160. doi:10.1177/109821400102200202
63. A.D.Smock,, N.B.Ellison,, C.Lampe,, & D.Y.Wohn, (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
64. J.Staddon,, A.Acquisti,, & K.LeFevre, (2013). Self-reported social network behavior: Accuracy predictors and implications for the privacy paradox. IEEE: Computer Society, 295–302.
65. N.J.Stroud, (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
66. S.S.Sundar,, & A.M.Limperos, (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
67. C.S.Taber,, & M.Lodge, (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-3
68. D.Tewksbury, (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 694–710. doi:10.1111/jcom.2003.53.issue-4
69. D.Tewksbury,, & S.L.Althaus, (2000). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 457–479. doi:10.1177/107769900007700301
70. K.Thorson, (2012). What does it mean to be a good citizen? Citizenship vocabularies as resources for action. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 70–85. doi:10.1177/0002716212453264
71. K.Thorson,, E.K.Vraga,, & N.Klinger-Vilenchik, (2014). Don’t push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on Facebook. In J.A.Hendricks, & D.Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media: An analysis of the 2012 campaign (pp. 74–93). Boulder, CO: Oxford University Press.
72. R.Tourangeau,, & K.Rasinski, (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
73. R.Tourangeau,, L.J.Rips,, & K.Rasinski, (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74. J.Turcotte,, C.York,, J.Irving,, R.Scholl,, & R.J.Pingree, (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 520–535. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12127
75. J.Vitak,, P.Zube,, A.Smock,, C.T.Carr,, N.Ellison,, & C.Lampe, (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(3), 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
76. E.K.Vraga,, L.Bode,, A.Smithson,, & S.Troller-Renfree, (2014). Blurred lines: Defining social, news, and political posts on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19331681.2016.1160265
77. E.K.Vraga,, L.Bode,, & S.Troller-Renfree, (2015a). Eyes don’t lie: Validating self-reported measures of attention on social media. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (Communication Theory & Methodology), San Francisco, CA.
78. E.K.Vraga,, K.Thorson,, N.Kligler-Vilenchik,, & E.Gee, (2015b). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
79. T.E.Weber, (2010). How Facebook decides what to put in your News Feed – These 10 secrets reveal all. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/how-facebook-decides-what-to-put-in-your-news-feed–these-10-secrets-reveal-all-2010-10
80. R.Weber,, M.Mangus,, & R.Huskey, (2015). Brain imaging in communication research: A practical guide to understanding and evaluating fMRI studies. Communication Methods and Measures, 9, 5–29. doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.999754
81. B.E.Weeks,, & R.L.Holbert, (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 212–232. doi:10.1177/1077699013482906
82. K.Wise,, P.D.Bolls,, & S.R.Schaefer, (2008). Choosing and reading online news: How available choice affects cognitive processing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 69–85. doi:10.1080/08838150701820858
83. J.Zaller, (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. D.Zillmann, (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1, 69–94. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5
85. D.Zillmann, (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, S221–S237. doi:10.1111/jcom.2006.56.issue-s1