How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 45, Issue , 2015, Pages 281-289

  Vraga, Emily K ^a   Thorson, Kjerstin ^b   Kligler Vilenchik, Neta ^b   Gee, Emily ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict avoidance; Discussion norms; Heterogeneous discussion; Political communication; Social media

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

CONFLICT AVOIDANCE; DISCUSSION NORMS; HETEROGENEOUS DISCUSSION; POLITICAL COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL MEDIA;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84920531892     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baek, K., Holton, A., Harp, D., & Yaschur, C. (2011). The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2243-2248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.003.
2. Bakshy, E. (2012a). The 2012 election day through the Facebook lens. 〈https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-science/the-2012-election-day-through-the-facebook-lens/10151181043778859〉 Accessed 12.08.14.
3. Bakshy, E. (2012b). Rethinking information diversity in networks. 〈https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-team/rethinking-information-diversity-in-networks/10150503499618859〉 Accessed 12.08.14.
4. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 519-528). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907.
5. Bode, L. (2012). Political information 2.0: A study in political learning via social media (Doctoral Dissertation).
6. Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 414-429.
7. boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social networking sites (pp. 39-58). New York: Routledge.
8. Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x.
9. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.
10. Bumgarner, B. A. (2007). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12(11).
11. Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-toface behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behaviors, 29, 2156-2160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009.
12. Cresswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2006). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
13. Cunningham, B. (2003). Rethinking objectivity. Columbia Journalism Review, 42, 24-32.
14. Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Socialmedia update 2013. Pew research internet project. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/.
15. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
17. Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and "heterogeneity" of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x.
18. Fernandes, J., Giurcanu, M., Bowers, K. W., & Neely, J. C. (2010). The writing on the wall: A content analysis of college students' Facebook groups for the 2008 presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 653-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.516865.
19. Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92-99.
20. Fung, T. K., Vraga, E. K., & Thorson, K. (2010). When bloggers attack: Examining the effect of negative citizen-initiated campaigning in the 2008 presidential election. In J. A. Hendricks & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), Techno-politics and presidential campaigning: New technologies, new voices, new voters (pp. 83-101). New York: Routledge.
21. Gil de Zuniga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x.
22. Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A., & Huge, M. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as selfcensorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9008-3.
23. Hayes (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
24. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, and Society, 8, 125-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185.
25. Huckfeldt, R. R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81, 1197-1216.
27. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
28. Kim, Y. (2011). The contribution of social networking sites to exposure to political difference: The relationship among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behaviors, 27, 971-977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001.
29. Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, and participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198541.
30. Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x.
31. Knoke, D. (1990). Networks of political activism: Toward theory construction. Social Forces, 68(4), 1041-1063.
32. Kovach, B., & Rosensteil, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York: Crown Publishers.
33. Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32, 87-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650204271400.
34. Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56, 330-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195.
35. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.
36. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods, 44(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.
37. Matthes, J. (2013). Do hostile opinion environments harm political participation? The moderating role of generalized social trust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 23-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds006.
38. McClurg, S. D. (2006). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement, and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9015-4.
39. McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 299-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412712.
40. Miron, A. M., Brummett, B., Ruggles, B., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). Deterring anger and anger-motivated behaviors. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 326-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973530802502259.
41. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452.
42. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43. Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout? Political Studies, 59, 674-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.x.
44. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion-our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Östman, J., & Ekström, M. (2013). Information, interaction and creative production: The effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement. Advance online publication. Communication Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650213476295.
46. Pew (2012, September). Politics on social networking sites. Pew internet and American life project. 〈http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP-PoliticalLifeonSocialNetworkingSites.pdf〉 Accessed 12.08.14.
47. Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012, October 19). Social media and political engagement. Pew internet and American life project. 〈http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP-SocialMediaAndPoliticalEngagement-PDF.pdf〉 Accessed 12.08.14.
48. Rui, J. R., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic image management online: Self-presentation, self-esteem, and social network perspectives. Information, Communication, and Society, 16, 1286-1305.
49. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209.
50. Shrum, L. J. (2008). Effects and underlying processes. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 50.
51. Thorson, K., Vraga, E. K., & Klinger-Vilenchik, N. (2014). Don't push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on Facebook. In J. A. Hendricks & D. Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media: An analysis of the 2012 campaign (pp. 74-93). Boulder, CO: Oxford University Press.
52. Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21(3), 265-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022087617514.
53. Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920-942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375.
54. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social networking site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x.
55. Van Laer, J., & van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication, and Society, 2010, 1146-1171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691181003628307.
56. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. F. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0226.
58. Vraga, E. K., Edgerly, S. E., Bode, L., Carr, D. J., Bard, M., Johnson, C. N., et al. (2012). The correspondent, the comic, and the combatant: The consequences of host style in political talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699011428575.
59. Wyatt, R. O., Kim, J., & Katz, E. (2000). How feeling free to talk affects ordinary political conversation, purposeful argumentation, and civic participation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700108.
60. Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x.