Self-reported social network behavior: Accuracy predictors and implications for the privacy paradox

Proceedings - SocialCom/PASSAT/BigData/EconCom/BioMedCom 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 295-302

  Staddon, Jessica ^a   Acquisti, Alessandro ^a   LeFevre, Kristen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL DATA; GOOGLE+; LURKERS; NETWORK BEHAVIORS; PRIVACY CONCERNS; TIME WINDOWS;

VISIBILITY;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84893541966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SocialCom.2013.48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Acquisti, A.. Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, 2004, 21-29.
2. Acquisti, A. and J. Grossklags. Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. Security & Privacy, IEEE, 3(1), 2005, 26-33.
3. S. Adams, C. Matthews, C. Ebbeling, C. Moore, J. Cunningham, J. Fulton and J. Hebert. The effect of social desirability and social approval on selfreports of physical activity. American Journal of Epidemiology. October 2010.
4. R. Akee. Errors in Self-Reported Earnings:The Role of Previous Earnings Volatility. Discussion Paper No. 326. December 2007. Institude for the Stude of Labor, Bonn, Germany. http://ftp.iza.org/dp3263.pdf
5. Barnes, S.B.. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday. September 2006. from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/ article/view/1394/1312
6. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T.. Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. ACM CHI 2009: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2009, 945-954.
7. C. Butts. Network inference, error, and informant (in)accuracy: A Bayesian approach. Social Networks, 25(2), 2003, 103-140. http://www.casos.cs. cmu.edu/publications/papers/Butts.NetworkInference.pdf
8. L. Crockett, J. Schulenberg and A. Petersen. Congruence between objective and self-report data in a sample of young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(4), 1987, 383-392.
9. S. Donaldson and E. Grant-Vallone. Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), Winter 2002.
10. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1975.
11. Gross, R. and A. Acquisti. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, 2005, 71-80.
12. D. Ionescu. Google+ outranks Twitter as the no. 2 social network after Facebook. PCWorld. January 28, 2013. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2026521/ google-outranks-twitter-as-no-2-social-network-after-facebook.html
13. R. Junko. Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (2013) 626-631. http://reyjunco.com/wordpress/ pdf/JuncoFBActualvsSRCHB2013.pdf
14. Sanjay Kairam, Michael J. Brzozowski, David Huffaker, Ed H. Chi. Talking in Circles: Selective Sharing in Google+. In Proc. CHI2012. May 5, 2012. Austin, TX, USA.
15. P. Klasnja, B. Harrison, L. LeGrand, A. LaMarca, J. Froehlich, S. Hudson. Using Wearable Sensors and Real Time Inference to Understand Human Recall of Routine Activities. Ubicomp 2008. http://dub.washington.edu/djangosite/media/ papers/ubicomp233-klasnja.pdf
16. E. Kupek. Bias and heteroscedastic memory error in self-reported health behavior: an investigation using covariance structure analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2(1), 2002, 14.
17. A. Lenhart, M. Madden, A. Smith, K. Purcell, K. Zickuhr and L. Rainie. Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media.aspx
18. A. Lenhart. Teens, Smartphones & Texting. Pew Internet, 2012. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx
19. M. Madden, A. Lenhart, S. Cortesi, U. Gasser, M. Duggan and A. Smith. Teens, Social Media, and Privacy. Pew Internet, 2013.http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2013/Teens-Social-Media-And-Privacy/Main-Report/Part-1.aspx
20. Maxey, E. J., & Ormsby, V. S.. The accuracy of self-report information collected on the ACT Test Battery: High school grades and items of nonacademic achievement. ACT Research Report No. 45. Iowa City, IA, 1971.
21. J. Nielsen. Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute. October 2006. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation- inequality/
22. P. Norberg, D. R. Horne and D. A. Horne. The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, March 2007.
23. N. Perkin. Is the 1,9, 90 rule outdated? Only Dead Fish (blog). May 2012. http://neilperkin.typepad.com/only dead fish/2012/05/is-the-1990-rule-outdated. html
24. Pew Internet. Social Networking. http://www.pewinternet.org/topics/ Social-Networking.aspx?typeFilter=5\&start=1\&x=x\&x=x#ListContinue
25. J. Brenner. Pew Internet: Social Networking (Full Detail). February 2013. http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking- full-detail.aspx
26. L. Rainie and S. Fox. Just-in-time Information through Mobile Connections. Pew Internet, 2012. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Just-in- time.aspx
27. Stutzman, F., Gross, R., and A. Acquisti. Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 4(2), 2012.
28. Utz, S., and Kramer, N.. The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), 2009. http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009111001\&article=1