They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 343-370

  Kteily, Nour ^a   Hodson, Gordon ^b   Bruneau, Emile ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict resolution; Dehumanization; Intergroup relations; Metadehumanization; Metaperceptions

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; AMERICAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEHUMANIZATION; HUMAN; HUNGARIAN (CITIZEN); IDENTITY; ISRAELI; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MUSLIM; PALESTINIAN; PERCEPTION; PREJUDICE; ADULT; ARAB; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUNGARY; ISLAM; ISRAEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; ROMANI (PEOPLE); UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ARABS; DEHUMANIZATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; HUNGARY; ISLAM; ISRAEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREJUDICE; ROMA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84964325515     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000044     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Albarello, F., & Rubini, M. (2012). Reducing dehumanisation outcomes towards Blacks: The role of multiple categorisation and of human identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 875-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1902
2. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Andrighetto, L., Baldissarri, C., Lattanzio, S., Loughnan, S., & Volpato, C. (2014). Human-itarian aid? Two forms of dehumanization and willing-ness to help after natural disasters. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 573-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12066
4. Bain, P. G., Vaes, J., & Leyens, J. P. (2014). Humanness and dehumanization. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
5. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
6. Bandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253-269. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/0092-6566(75)90001-X
7. Barlow, F. K., Sibley, C. G., & Hornsey, M. J. (2012). Rejection as a call to arms: Inter-racial hostility and support for political action as outcomes of race-based rejection in majority and minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 167-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02040.x
8. Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21, 351-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00192
9. Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., & Haslam, N. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS ONE, 8, e61842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
10. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022
11. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2011). Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 01973533.2011.614132
12. Bendersky, C. (2014). Resolving ideological conflicts by affirming opponents' status: The Tea Party, Obamacare and the 2013 government shutdown. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 163-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.011
13. Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018474
14. Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H., Leyens, J. P., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Psycholinguistic distinctiveness: Language divergence in Belgium. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 158-185). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.
16. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999b). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
17. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/ejsp.2420240603
18. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/0022-4537.00126
19. Bruneau, E., Jacoby, N., Kteily, N., Ligouri, L., & Saxe, R. (under review). Denying humanity: Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
21. Capozza, D., Andrighetto, L., Di Bernardo, G. A., & Falvo, R. (2012). Does status affect intergroup perceptions of humanity? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 363-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1368430211426733
22. Castano, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804-818. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
23. CBS News. (2012, September 15). Widespread protests against U.S. over anti-Muslim film. CBS. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/widespread-protests-against-us-over-anti-muslim-film/
24. Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2010). Exploring the roots of dehumanization:The role of animal-Human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 3-22. http://dx .doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347725
25. Cuddy, A. J., Rock, M. S., & Norton, M. I. (2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 107-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207071344
26. Demoulin, S., Cortes, B. P., Viki, T. G., Rodriguez, A. P., Rodriguez, R. T., Paladino, M. P., & Leyens, J. P. (2009). The role of in-group identification in infra-humanization. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 4-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207590802057654
27. Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, M.-P., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Dovidio, J. (2004). Dimensions of "uniquely" and "non-uniquely" human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930244000444
28. Devine, P. G., Evett, S. R., & Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1996). Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of intergroup contact. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 423-464). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29. Doosje, B., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). What have they done for us lately? The dynamics of reciprocity in intergroup contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 508-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02133.x
30. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.766
31. Enyedi, Zs., Erős, F., & Fábián, Z. (2001). Tekintélyelvűség és előítélet:Újabb magyarországi vizsgálatok [Authoritarianism and prejudice: New Hungarian investigation]. In Hunyadi Gy. & Nguyen Luu Lan Anh (Eds.) Stereotype-research. Traditions and directions (pp. 391-402). Budapest: Eötvös Kiadó.
32. Esposito, J. L., & Mogahed, D. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
33. Forscher, P. S., Cox, W. T., Graetz, N., & Devine, P. G. (2015). The motivation to express prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 791-812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000030
34. Frey, F. E., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 265-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_5
35. Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292
36. Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M., & DiTomasso, N. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 526-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035663
37. Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105-1118. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1105
38. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
39. Haslam, N. (2014). What is dehumanization? In P. Bain, J. Vaes, & J. P. Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 34-48). London, England: Psychology Press.
40. Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M., & Bastian, B. (2005). More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 937-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.937
41. Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
42. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY:Guilford Press.
43. Hetherington, M., & Suhay, E. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans' support for the War on Terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 546 -560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00514.x
44. Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K.,.. Stewart, A. (in press). The nature of social dominance orientation: Introducing the Social Dominance Orientation-7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
45. Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765
46. Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., & Costello, K. (2009). Experiencing Alien-Nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 974-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.010
47. Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x
48. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self-categorization Theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
49. Iatridis, T. (2013). Occupational status differences in attributions of uniquely human emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 431-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02094.x
50. Jetten, J., Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2013). Rebels without a cause: Discrimination appraised as legitimate harms group commitment. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 159-172. http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/1368430212445075
51. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
52. Kamans, E., Gordijn, E. H., Oldenhuis, H., & Otten, S. (2009). What I think you see is what you get: Influence of prejudice on assimilation to negative meta-stereotypes among Dutch Moroccan teenagers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 842-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.593
53. Kelman, H. C. (1987). The political psychology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: How can we overcome the barriers to a negotiated solution? Political Psychology, 8, 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791039
54. Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1997). Defending the status quo: Power and bias in social conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1066-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672972310007
55. Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 901-931. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048
56. Kteily, N., Cotterill, S., Sidanius, J., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., & Bergh, R. (2014). "Not one of us": Predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1231-1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167214539708
57. Kteily, N., Ho, A. K., & Sidanius, J. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 543-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.007
58. Leidner, B., Castano, E., Zaiser, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210376391
59. Leyens, J. P., Demoulin, S., Vaes, J., Gaunt, R., & Paladino, M. P. (2007). Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 139-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00006.x
60. Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
61. MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2012). Intergroup bias toward "Group X":Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 725-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430212442419
62. Miranda, M., Gourveia-Pereira, M., & Vaes, J. (2014). When in Rome.. Identification and acculturation strategies among minority members moderate the dehumanization of the majority outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 327-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp .2025
63. News, B. B. C. (2012, September 14). US missions braced for protests over anti-Islam film. BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/worldmiddle-east-19596026
64. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x
65. Owuamalam, C., Issmer, C., Zagefka, H., Kla_en, M., & Wagner, U. (2014). Why do members of disadvantaged groups strike back at perceived negativity towards the in-group? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 249-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp .2165
66. Owuamalam, C. K., Tarrant, M., Farrow, C. V., & Zagefka, H. (2013). The effect of metastereotyping on judgements of higher-status outgroups when reciprocity and social image improvement motives collide. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 45, 12-23. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0030012
67. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Harwood, J., & Cairns, E. (2006). Intergroup contact and the promotion of intergroup harmony: The influence of intergroup emotions. In R. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences (pp. 209-238). Hove, England: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
68. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
69. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions costs, consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x
70. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209336610
71. Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364 -373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364
72. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 94-109). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
73. Vaes, J., Leyens, J. P., Paladino, M. P., & Miranda, P. (2012). We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanization of the ingroup. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 64-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.665250
74. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
75. Viki, G., Osgood, D., & Phillips, S. (2013). Dehumanization and selfreported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 325-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006
76. Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Main, K. J., & Roy, S. A. (2000). Metastereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690
77. Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self-versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706-719. http://doi.10.1177/0146167201276006
78. Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O'Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917-937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
79. Vorauer, J. D., & Sakamoto, Y. (2008). Who cares what the outgroup thinks? Testing an information search model of the importance individuals accord to an outgroup member's view of them during intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1467-1480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012631
80. Waytz, A., Schroeder, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The lesser minds problem. In P. Bain, J. Vaes, & J. P. Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 49-67). London, England: Psychology Press.
81. Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividualintergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.698
82. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Judd, C. M., & Muller, D. (2009). How do they see us? The vicissitudes of metaperception in intergroup relations. In S. Demoulin, J. P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings:Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 63-100). Hove: Psychology Press.