Mechanosensing via cell-matrix adhesions in 3D microenvironments

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 343, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 60-66

  Doyle, Andrew D ^a   Yamada, Kenneth M ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

3D migration; Adhesion; Collagen; Contractility; Dynamics; Mechanotransduction

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL ORGANELLE; CELL SIZE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURFACE; COLLAGEN FIBRIL; ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; FOCAL ADHESION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL-MATRIX JUNCTIONS; COLLAGEN TYPE I; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION;

EID: 84964318824     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.033     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
2. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
3. Weiss P., Garber B. Shape and movement of mesenchyme cells as functions of the physical structure of the medium: contributions to a quantitative morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1952, 38:264-280.
4. Lo C.M., Wang H.B., Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 2000, 79:144-152.
5. Beningo K.A., Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:18024-18029.
6. Grinnell F. Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13:264-269.
7. Plotnikov S.V., Pasapera A.M., Sabass B., Waterman C.M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 2012, 151:1513-1527.
8. Wolf K., et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 201:1069-1084.
9. Roeder B.A., Kokini K., Voytik-Harbin S.L. Fibril microstructure affects strain transmission within collagen extracellular matrices. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131:031004.
10. Doyle A.D., Carvajal N., Jin A., Matsumoto K., Yamada K.M. Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions. Nat. Commun. 2015, 10.1038/ncomms9720 (in press).
11. Guthold M., et al. A comparison of the mechanical and structural properties of fibrin fibers with other protein fibers. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 49:165-181.
12. An K.N., Sun Y.L., Luo Z.P. Flexibility of type I collagen and mechanical property of connective tissue. Biorheology 2004, 41:239-246.
13. Pedersen J.A., Swartz M.A. Mechanobiology in the third dimension. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33:1469-1490.
14. Lee B., et al. A three-dimensional computational model of collagen network mechanics. PLoS One 2014, 9:e111896.
15. Munster S., et al. Strain history dependence of the nonlinear stress response of fibrin and collagen networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:12197-12202.
16. Kubow K.E., Conrad S.K., Horwitz A.R. Matrix microarchitecture and myosin II determine adhesion in 3D matrices. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1607-1619.
17. Riching K.M., et al. 3D collagen alignment limits protrusions to enhance breast cancer cell persistence. Biophys. J. 2014, 107:2546-2558.
18. Provenzano P.P., Inman D.R., Eliceiri K.W., Trier S.M., Keely P.J. Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:5374-5384.
19. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
20. Kutys M.L., Doyle A.D., Yamada K.M. Regulation of cell adhesion and migration by cell-derived matrices. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319:2434-2439.
21. Doyle A.D., et al. Micro-environmental control of cell migration--myosin IIA is required for efficient migration in fibrillar environments through control of cell adhesion dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:2244-2256.
22. Petrie R.J., Gavara N., Chadwick R.S., Yamada K.M. Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:439-455.
23. Doyle A.D., Wang F.W., Matsumoto K., Yamada K.M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:481-490.
24. Hakkinen K.M., Harunaga J.S., Doyle A.D., Yamada K.M. Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng. A 2011, 17:713-724.
25. Petrie R.J., Koo H., Yamada K.M. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 2014, 345:1062-1065.
26. Winer J.P., Oake S., Janmey P.A. Non-linear elasticity of extracellular matrices enables contractile cells to communicate local position and orientation. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6382.
27. Miller J.S., et al. Bioactive hydrogels made from step-growth derived PEG-peptide macromers. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3736-3743.
28. Legant W.R., et al. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:969-971.
29. Kim I.L., Khetan S., Baker B.M., Chen C.S., Burdick J.A. Fibrous hyaluronic acid hydrogels that direct MSC chondrogenesis through mechanical and adhesive cues. Biomaterials 2013, 34:5571-5580.
30. Friedland J.C., Lee M.H., Boettiger D. Mechanically activated integrin switch controls alpha5beta1 function. Science 2009, 323:642-644.
31. Harunaga J.S., Yamada K.M. Cell-matrix adhesions in 3D. Matrix Biol. 2011, 30:363-368.
32. Fraley S.I., et al. A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:598-604.
33. Pelham R.J., Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:13661-13665.
34. Paszek M.J., et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005, 8:241-254.
35. Miron-Mendoza M., Seemann J., Grinnell F. The differential regulation of cell motile activity through matrix stiffness and porosity in three dimensional collagen matrices. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6425-6435.
36. Thievessen I., et al. Vinculin is required for cell polarization, migration, and extracellular matrix remodeling in 3D collagen. FASEB J. 2015, 10.1096/fj.14-268235.
37. Goldmann W.H., Auernheimer V., Thievessen I., Fabry B. Vinculin, cell mechanics and tumour cell invasion. Cell Biol. Int. 2013, 37:397-405.
38. Zhong J., et al. NEDD9 stabilizes focal adhesions, increases binding to the extra-cellular matrix and differentially effects 2D versus 3D cell migration. PLoS One 2012, 7:e35058.
39. Deakin N.O., Ballestrem C., Turner C.E. Paxillin and Hic-5 interaction with vinculin is differentially regulated by Rac1 and RhoA. PLoS One 2012, 7:e37990.
40. Deakin N.O., Turner C.E. Distinct roles for paxillin and Hic-5 in regulating breast cancer cell morphology, invasion, and metastasis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:327-341.
41. Kutys M.L., Yamada K.M. An extracellular-matrix-specific GEF-GAP interaction regulates Rho GTPase crosstalk for 3D collagen migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:909-917.
42. Even-Ram S., et al. Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin-microtubule crosstalk. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:299-309.
43. Wolf K., Friedl P. Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:736-744.
44. Mierke C.T., et al. Vinculin facilitates cell invasion into three-dimensional collagen matrices. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:13121-13130.
45. Fraley S.I., Feng Y., Giri A., Longmore G.D., Wirtz D. Dimensional and temporal controls of three-dimensional cell migration by zyxin and binding partners. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3:719.
46. Li N., Goodwin R.L., Potts J.D. Zyxin regulates cell migration and differentiation in EMT during chicken AV valve morphogenesis. Microsc. Microanal. 2013, 19:842-854.
47. Gjorevski N., Piotrowski A.S., Varner V.D., Nelson C.M. Dynamic tensile forces drive collective cell migration through three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:11458.
48. Gupton S.L., Waterman-Storer C.M. Spatiotemporal feedback between actomyosin and focal-adhesion systems optimizes rapid cell migration. Cell 2006, 125:1361-1374.
49. Kubow K.E., Horwitz A.R. Reducing background fluorescence reveals adhesions in 3D matrices. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:3-5. author reply 5-7.
50. Fischer R.S., Wu Y., Kanchanawong P., Shroff H., Waterman C.M. Microscopy in 3D: a biologist's toolbox. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:682-691.
51. Frigault M.M., Lacoste J., Swift J.L., Brown C.M. Live-cell microscopy - tips and tools. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:753-767.
52. Yamada K.M., Pankov R., Cukierman E. Dimensions and dynamics in integrin function. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2003, 36:959-966.
53. Zamir E., et al. Dynamics and segregation of cell-matrix adhesions in cultured fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:191-196.
54. Broussard J.A., et al. Automated analysis of cell-matrix adhesions in 2D and 3D environments. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:8124.
55. Hernandez-Varas P., Berge U., Lock J.G., Stromblad S. A plastic relationship between vinculin-mediated tension and adhesion complex area defines adhesion size and lifetime. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:7524.
56. Hotta K., et al. Biophysical properties of intrinsically disordered p130Cas substrate domain--implication in mechanosensing. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10:e1003532.
57. Moore S.W., Roca-Cusachs P., Sheetz M.P. Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:194-206.
58. Margadant F., et al. Mechanotransduction in vivo by repeated talin stretch-relaxation events depends upon vinculin. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001223.
59. Kong F., Garcia A.J., Mould A.P., Humphries M.J., Zhu C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:1275-1284.
60. Kong F., et al. Cyclic mechanical reinforcement of integrin-ligand interactions. Mol. Cell 2013, 49:1060-1068.
61. Guo B., Guilford W.H. Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:9844-9849.
62. Hu K., Ji L., Applegate K.T., Danuser G., Waterman-Storer C.M. Differential transmission of actin motion within focal adhesions. Science 2007, 315:111-115.
63. Lele T.P., et al. Mechanical forces alter zyxin unbinding kinetics within focal adhesions of living cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2006, 207:187-194.
64. del Rio A., et al. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science 2009, 323:638-641.
65. Thievessen I., et al. Vinculin-actin interaction couples actin retrograde flow to focal adhesions, but is dispensable for focal adhesion growth. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 202:163-177.
66. Case L.B., Waterman C.M. Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:955-963.
67. Hirata H., Sokabe M., Lim C.T. Molecular mechanisms underlying the force-dependent regulation of actin-to-ECM linkage at the focal adhesions. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2014, 126:135-154.
68. Bell G.I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 1978, 200:618-627.
69. Schwarz U.S., Erdmann T., Bischofs I.B. Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model. Biosystems 2006, 83:225-232.
70. Chiu C.L., et al. Nanoimaging of focal adhesion dynamics in 3D. PLoS One 2014, 9:e99896.
71. Tolde O., Rosel D., Janostiak R., Vesely P., Brabek J. Dynamics and morphology of focal adhesions in complex 3D environment. Folia Biol. (Praha) 2012, 58:177-184.
72. Polacheck W.J., German A.E., Mammoto A., Ingber D.E., Kamm R.D. Mechanotransduction of fluid stresses governs 3D cell migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:2447-2452.
73. Balzer E.M., et al. Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes. FASEB J. 2012, 26:4045-4056.
74. Bergert M., et al. Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:524-529.
75. Stroka K.M., et al. Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 2014, 157:611-623.
76. Staudinger L.A., et al. Interactions between the discoidin domain receptor 1 and beta1 integrin regulate attachment to collagen. Biol. Open 2013, 2:1148-1159.
77. Bass M.D., et al. Syndecan-4-dependent Rac1 regulation determines directional migration in response to the extracellular matrix. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 177:527-538.
78. Morgan M.R., et al. Syndecan-4 phosphorylation is a control point for integrin recycling. Dev. Cell 2013, 24:472-485.
79. Paszek M.J., et al. The cancer glycocalyx mechanically primes integrin-mediated growth and survival. Nature 2014, 511:319-325.