The accuracy benefit of multiple amperometric glucose sensors in people with type 1 diabetes

Diabetes Care

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 706-710

  Castle, Jessica R ^a   Pitts, Amy ^a   Hanavan, Kathryn ^a   Muhly, Rhonda ^a   El Youssef, Joseph ^a   Hughes Karvetski, Colleen ^b   Kovatchev, Boris ^b   Ward, W Kenneth ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AMPEROMETRIC BIOSENSOR; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CALIBRATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84862109765     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: 19355548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1929     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, et al.; Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1464-1476
2. Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, et al.; STAR 3 Study Group. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:311-320
3. Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:795-800
4. Castle JR, Ward WK. Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2010;4:221-225
5. Brauker J. Continuous glucose sensing: future technology developments. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11(Suppl. 1):S25-S36
6. Wentholt IM, Hart AA, Hoekstra JB, Devries JH. Relationship between interstitial and blood glucose in type 1 diabetes patients: delay and the push-pull phenomenon revisited. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007;9:169-175 (Pubitemid 46652552)
7. Wisniewski N, Moussy F, Reichert WM. Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling. Fresenius J Anal Chem 2000;366:611-621
8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance metrics for continuous interstitial glucose monitoring; approved guideline. CLSI document POCT05-A 2008;28:1-55
9. Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clarke WL. Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1922-1928 (Pubitemid 38989233)
10. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 1933;24:417-441, 498-520
11. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag 1901;6:559-572
12. Paté-Cornell ME, Dillon RL, Guikema SD. On the limitations of redundancies in the improvement of system reliability. Risk Anal 2004;24:1423-1436 (Pubitemid 40076067)
13. Schmidtke DW, Pishko MV, Quinn CP, Heller A. Statistics for critical clinical decision making based on readings of pairs of implanted sensors. Anal Chem 1996;68:2845-2849
14. El Youssef J, Castle JR, Engle JM, Massoud RG, Ward WK. Continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes: improvement in accuracy by correcting for background current. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:921-928
15. Gani A, Gribok AV, Lu Y, Ward WK, Vigersky RA, Reifman J. Universal glucose models for predicting subcutaneous glucose concentration in humans. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2010;14:157-165
16. Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Enhanced accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring by online extended kalman filtering. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:353-363