TAD disruption as oncogenic driver

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 36, Issue , 2016, Pages 34-40

  Valton, Anne Laure ^a   Dekker, Job ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF; CHROMATIN; ONCOPROTEIN;

CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMATIN; DISEASE ACTIVITY; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ONCOGENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; TOPOLOGICALLY ASSOCIATED DOMAIN; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN GENOME; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMICS; HUMANS; ONCOGENE PROTEINS, FUSION; PROTEIN DOMAINS;

EID: 84963894044     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.008     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Tolhuis B., Palstra R.J., Splinter E., Grosveld F., de Laat W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol Cell 2002, 10:1453-1465.
2. Gheldof N., Smith E.M., Tabuchi T.M., Koch C.M., Dunham I., Stamatoyannopoulos J.A., Dekker J. Cell-type-specific long-range looping interactions identify distant regulatory elements of the CFTR gene. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:4325-4336.
3. Sanyal A., Lajoie B.R., Jain G., Dekker J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 2012, 489:109-113.
4. Li G., Ruan X., Auerbach R.K., Sandhu K.S., Zheng M., Wang P., Poh H.M., Goh Y., Lim J., Zhang J., et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 2012, 148:84-98.
5. Dixon J.R., Selvaraj S., Yue F., Kim A., Li Y., Shen Y., Hu M., Liu J.S., Ren B. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012, 485:376-380.
6. Nora E.P., Lajoie B.R., Schulz E.G., Giorgetti L., Okamoto I., Servant N., Piolot T., van Berkum N.L., Meisig J., Sedat J., et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 2012, 485:381-385.
7. Rao S.S.P., Huntley M.H., Durand N.C., Stamenova E.K., Bochkov I.D., Robinson J.T., Sanborn A.L., Machol I., Omer A.D., Lander E.S., et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 2014, 159:1665-1680.
8. de Wit E., Vos E.S.M., Holwerda S.J.B., Valdes-Quezada C., Verstegen M.J.A.M., Teunissen H., Splinter E., Wijchers P.J., Krijger P.H.L., de Laat W. CTCF Binding Polarity Determines Chromatin Looping. Mol Cell 2015, 60:676-684.
9. Gómez-Marín C., Tena J.J., Acemel R.D., López-Mayorga M., Naranjo S., de la Calle-Mustienes E., Maeso I., Beccari L., Aneas I., Vielmas E., et al. Evolutionary comparison reveals that diverging CTCF sites are signatures of ancestral topological associating domains borders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:7542-7547.
10. Guo Y., Xu Q., Canzio D., Shou J., Li J., Gorkin D.U., Jung I., Wu H., Zhai Y., Tang Y., et al. CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function. Cell 2015, 162:900-910.
11. Vietri Rudan M., Barrington C., Henderson S., Ernst C., Odom D.T., Tanay A., Hadjur S. Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Rep 2015, 10:1297-1309.
12. Tang Z., Luo O.J., Li X., Zheng M., Zhu J.J., Szalaj P., Trzaskoma P., Magalska A., Wlodarczyk J., Ruszczycki B., et al. CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell 2015, 163:1611-1627.
13. Fudenberg G., Imakaev M., Lu C., Goloborodko A., Abdennur N., Mirny L.A. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. bioRxiv 2015, 10.1101/024620.
14. Sanborn A.L., Rao S.S.P., Huang S.-C., Durand N.C., Huntley M.H., Jewett A.I., Bochkov I.D., Chinnappan D., Cutkosky A., Li J., et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:E6456-E6465.
15. Dekker J., Mirny L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell 2016, 164:1110-1121.
16. Dekker J., Heard E. Structural and functional diversity of Topologically Associating Domains. FEBS Lett 2015, 589:2877-2884.
17. Symmons O., Uslu V.V., Tsujimura T., Ruf S., Nassari S., Schwarzer W., Ettwiller L., Spitz F. Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains. Genome Res 2014, 24:390-400.
18. Yang R., Kerschner J.L., Gosalia N., Neems D., Gorsic L.K., Safi A., Crawford G.E., Kosak S.T., Leir S.-H., Harris A. Differential contribution of cis-regulatory elements to higher order chromatin structure and expression of the CFTR locus. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 10.1093/nar/gkv1358.
19. Smith E.M., Lajoie B.R., Jain G., Dekker J. Invariant TAD boundaries constrain cell-type-specific looping interactions between promoters and distal elements around the CFTR locus. Am J Hum Genet 2016, 98:185-201.
20. Noordermeer D., Leleu M., Splinter E., Rougemont J., De Laat W., Duboule D. The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 2011, 334:222-225.
21. Andrey G., Montavon T., Mascrez B., Gonzalez F., Noordermeer D., Leleu M., Trono D., Spitz F., Duboule D. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 2013, 340:1234167.
22. Tsujimura T., Klein F.A., Langenfeld K., Glaser J., Huber W., Spitz F. A discrete transition zone organizes the topological and regulatory autonomy of the adjacent tfap2c and bmp7 genes. PLoS Genet 2015, 11:e1004897.
23. Giorgio E., Robyr D., Spielmann M., Ferrero E., Di Gregorio E., Imperiale D., Vaula G., Stamoulis G., Santoni F., Atzori C., et al. A large genomic deletion leads to enhancer adoption by the lamin B1 gene: a second path to autosomal dominant adult-onset demyelinating leukodystrophy (ADLD). Hum Mol Genet 2015, 24:3143-3154.
24. Lupiáñez D.G., Kraft K., Heinrich V., Krawitz P., Brancati F., Klopocki E., Horn D., Kayserili H., Opitz J.M., Laxova R., et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 2015, 161:1012-1025.
25. Lupiáñez D.G., Spielmann M., Mundlos S. Breaking TADs: how alterations of chromatin domains result in disease. Trends Genet TIG 2016, 10.1016/j.tig.2016.01.003.
26. Splinter E., Heath H., Kooren J., Palstra R.-J., Klous P., Grosveld F., Galjart N., de Laat W. CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev 2006, 20:2349-2354.
27. Dostie J., Richmond T.A., Arnaout R.A., Selzer R.R., Lee W.L., Honan T.A., Rubio E.D., Krumm A., Lamb J., Nusbaum C., et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 2006, 16:1299-1309.
28. Seitan V.C., Faure A.J., Zhan Y., McCord R.P., Lajoie B.R., Ing-Simmons E., Lenhard B., Giorgetti L., Heard E., Fisher A.G., et al. Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments. Genome Res 2013, 23:2066-2077.
29. Sofueva S., Yaffe E., Chan W.-C., Georgopoulou D., Vietri Rudan M., Mira-Bontenbal H., Pollard S.M., Schroth G.P., Tanay A., Hadjur S. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J 2013, 32:3119-3129.
30. Phillips-Cremins J.E., Sauria M.E.G., Sanyal A., Gerasimova T.I., Lajoie B.R., Bell J.S.K., Ong C.-T., Hookway T.A., Guo C., Sun Y., et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 2013, 153:1281-1295.
31. Zuin J., Dixon J.R., van der Reijden M.I.J.A., Ye Z., Kolovos P., Brouwer R.W.W., van de Corput M.P.C., van de Werken H.J.G., Knoch T.A., van IJcken W.F.J., et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:996-1001.
32. Dowen J.M., Fan Z.P., Hnisz D., Ren G., Abraham B.J., Zhang L.N., Weintraub A.S., Schuijers J., Lee T.I., Zhao K., et al. Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 2014, 159:374-387.
33. Narendra V., Rocha P.P., An D., Raviram R., Skok J.A., Mazzoni E.O., Reinberg D. Transcription. CTCF establishes discrete functional chromatin domains at the Hox clusters during differentiation. Science 2015, 347:1017-1021.
34. Heyn H., Vidal E., Ferreira H.J., Vizoso M., Sayols S., Gomez A., Moran S., Boque-Sastre R., Guil S., Martinez-Cardus A., et al. Epigenomic analysis detects aberrant super-enhancer DNA methylation in human cancer. Genome Biol 2016, 17:11.
35. Oldridge D.A., Wood A.C., Weichert-Leahey N., Crimmins I., Sussman R., Winter C., McDaniel L.D., Diamond M., Hart L.S., Zhu S., et al. Genetic predisposition to neuroblastoma mediated by a LMO1 super-enhancer polymorphism. Nature 2015, 528:418-421.
36. Flavahan W.A., Drier Y., Liau B.B., Gillespie S.M., Venteicher A.S., Stemmer-Rachamimov A.O., Suvà M.L., Bernstein B.E. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 2015, 10.1038/nature16490.
37. Ji X., Dadon D.B., Powell B.E., Fan Z.P., Borges-Rivera D., Shachar S., Weintraub A.S., Hnisz D., Pegoraro G., Lee T.I., et al. 3D Chromosome Regulatory Landscape of Human Pluripotent Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 10.1016/j.stem.2015.11.007.
38. Katainen R., Dave K., Pitkänen E., Palin K., Kivioja T., Välimäki N., Gylfe A.E., Ristolainen H., Hänninen U.A., Cajuso T., et al. CTCF/cohesin-binding sites are frequently mutated in cancer. Nat Genet 2015, 47:818-821.
39. Hnisz D., Weintraub A.S., Day D.S., Valton A.-L., Bak R.O., Li C.H., Goldmann J., Lajoie B.R., Fan Z.P., Sigova A.A., et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 2016, 10.1126/science.aad9024.
40. Zhang Y., Rowley J.D. Chromatin structural elements and chromosomal translocations in leukemia. DNA Repair 2006, 5:1282-1297.
41. Burman B., Zhang Z.Z., Pegoraro G., Lieb J.D., Misteli T. Histone modifications predispose genome regions to breakage and translocation. Genes Dev 2015, 29:1393-1402.
42. Gröschel S., Sanders M.A., Hoogenboezem R., de Wit E., Bouwman B.A.M., Erpelinck C., van der Velden V.H.J., Havermans M., Avellino R., van Lom K., et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 2014, 157:369-381.
43. Walker B.A., Wardell C.P., Brioli A., Boyle E., Kaiser M.F., Begum D.B., Dahir N.B., Johnson D.C., Ross F.M., Davies F.E., et al. Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J 2014, 4:e191.
44. Northcott P.A., Lee C., Zichner T., Stütz A.M., Erkek S., Kawauchi D., Shih D.J.H., Hovestadt V., Zapatka M., Sturm D., et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 2014, 511:428-434.
45. Puente X.S., Beà S., Valdés-Mas R., Villamor N., Gutiérrez-Abril J., Martín-Subero J.I., Munar M., Rubio-Pérez C., Jares P., Aymerich M., et al. Non-coding recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 2015, 526:519-524.
46. Ryan R.J.H., Drier Y., Whitton H., Cotton M.J., Kaur J., Issner R., Gillespie S., Epstein C.B., Nardi V., Sohani A.R., et al. Detection of enhancer-associated rearrangements reveals mechanisms of oncogene dysregulation in B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Discov 2015, 5:1058-1071.
47. Kon A., Shih L.-Y., Minamino M., Sanada M., Shiraishi Y., Nagata Y., Yoshida K., Okuno Y., Bando M., Nakato R., et al. Recurrent mutations in multiple components of the cohesin complex in myeloid neoplasms. Nat Genet 2013, 45:1232-1237.
48. Leiserson M.D.M., Vandin F., Wu H.-T., Dobson J.R., Eldridge J.V., Thomas J.L., Papoutsaki A., Kim Y., Niu B., McLellan M., et al. Pan-cancer network analysis identifies combinations of rare somatic mutations across pathways and protein complexes. Nat Genet 2015, 47:106-114.