Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 662-669

  Hopia, Hanna ^a   Latvala, Eila ^a   Liimatainen, Leena ^a  

^a JAMK UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

Author keywords

integrative review; literature review; methodology; nursing research

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CINAHL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDLINE; NURSE RESEARCHER; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EXPERTISE; NURSING PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION; PUBLICATION; SOUND; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; LITERATURE; NURSING RESEARCH;

NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84963838617     PISSN: 02839318     EISSN: 14716712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/scs.12327     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Gough D. Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal. BMC Med 2013; 11: 22.
2. Polit D, Beck C. Essentials of Nursing Research. Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice, 8th edn. 2014, Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia, China.
3. Cooper H. Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 4th edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 2. 2010, Sage Publication Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
4. Evans D. Overview of Methods. In Reviewing Research Evidence for Nursing Practice (Webb C, Roe B eds), 2007, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, 137–48.
5. Whittemore R. Rigour in Integrative Reviews. In Reviewing Research Evidence for Nursing Practice (Webb C, Roe B eds), 2007, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, 149–56.
6. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52: 546–53.
7. Cooper H. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews, 3rd edn. 1989, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
8. Smith M, Stullenbarger E. A prototype for integrative review and meta-analysis of nursing research. J Adv Nurs 1991; 16: 1272–83.
9. Gough D, Sandy O, Thomas J. Introducing systematic reviews. In An introduction to Systematic reviews. (Gough D, Sandy O, Thomas J eds), 2012, Sage Publications Ltd, London, 1–16.
10. Sulosaari V, Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H. An integrative review of the literature on registered nurses’ medication competence. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 464–78.
11. Cameron J, Roxburgh M, Taylor J, Lauder W. Why students leave in the UK: an integrative review of the international research literature. J Clin Nurs 2010; 20: 1086–96.
12. Cameron J, Roxburgh M, Taylor J, Lauder W. An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and midwifery education: why do students stay? J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 1372–82.
13. Zahara-Such RM. Improving medication calculations of nursing students through simulation: an integrative review. Clin Simul Nurs 2013; 9: 379–83.
14. Sangster-Gormley E, Martin-Misener R, Downe-Wamboldt B, Dicenso A. Factors affecting nurse practitioner role implementation in Canadian practice settings: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67: 1178–90.
15. Walsh M, Bailey PH, Koren I. Objective structured clinical evaluation of clinical competence: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 1584–95.
16. Shearer JE. High-fidelity simulation and safety: an integrative review. J Nurs Educ 2013; 52: 39–45.
17. Bloomfield JG, While AE, Roberts JD. Using computer assisted learning for clinical skills education in nursing: integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2008; 63: 222–35.
18. Morrison SM, Symes L. An integrative review of expert nursing practice. J Nurs Scholars 2011; 43: 163–70.
19. Wilkinson A, While AE, Roberts J. Measurement of information and communication technology experience and attitudes to e-learning of students in the healthcare professions: integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 755–72.
20. Olson CA. Using the grey literature to enhance research and practice in continuing education for health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2013; 33: 1–3.
21. Brunton T, Thomas J. Information management in reviews. In An introduction to Systematic reviews, (Gough D, Sandy O, Thomas J. eds), 2012, Sage Publications Ltd, London, 83–106.
22. Pölkki T, Kanste O, Kääriäinen M, Elo S, Kyngäs H. The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 2013; 23: 315–32.
23. Whittemore R. Analysis of integration in nursing science and practice. J Nurs Scholarsh 2005; 37: 261–7.