Using the grey literature to enhance research and practice in continuing education for health professionals

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-3

  Olson, Curtis A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLISHING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84875532536     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.21159     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Knox AB. Congress commentary. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013;33(1):11-13.
2. Moore DE, Jr. Congress commentary. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2012;33(1):4-10.
3. Schöpfel J, Farace DJ. Grey literature. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN, eds. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd ed. London, England: CRC Press; 2010:2029-2039.
4. Giustini D. Finding the Hard to Finds: Searching for Grey Literature-2012 Update. 2012. http://blogs.ubc.ca/dean/2010/02/finding-the-hard-to-finds-searching-for-grey-gray-literature-2010/. Accessed December 2, 2012.
5. Luzi D. Trends and evolution in the development of grey literature: a review. International Journal on Grey Literature. 2000;1(3):106-117.
6. Bergman MK. The deep Web: surfacing hidden value. Journal of Electronic Publishing. 2001;7(1). http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=jep;view=text;rgn=main;idno=3336451.0007.104. Accessed December 3, 2012.
7. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
8. Mallett S, Hopewell S, Clarke M. The first 1000 Cochrane systematic reviews. Fourth Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Pushing the Boundaries; 2002; Oxford, England.
9. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
10. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2012. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/MethodsGuide_Prepublication-Draft_20120523.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2012.
11. Giustini D. Standing Out in a Sea of Grey Literature: A Producer's (Librarian) Perspective. 2011. http://www.academyhealth.org/Training/ResourceDetail.cfm?ItemNumber=7068. Accessed December 3, 2012.