A self-folding hydrogel in vitro model for ductal carcinoma

Tissue Engineering - Part C: Methods

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 398-407

  Kwag, Hye Rin ^a   Serbo, Janna V ^b   Korangath, Preethi ^b   Sukumar, Saraswati ^b   Romer, Lewis H ^b   Gracias, David H ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELLS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CYTOLOGY; MICROSTRUCTURE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

DIFFERENTIAL SWELLING; DISEASED TISSUES; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; HYDROGEL MICROSTRUCTURES; MDA-MB-231 CELLS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL DIACRYLATE; SELF-FOLDING HYDROGELS;

HYDROGELS;

ACRYLIC ACID; GELATIN; MACROGOL; METHACRYLIC ACID; HYDROGEL; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYETHYLENEGLYCOL 400 DIACRYLATE;

ARTICLE; BILAYER MEMBRANE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MICROTECHNOLOGY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; VISCOSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; IMMOBILIZED CELL; METABOLISM; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELLS, IMMOBILIZED; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 84963788701     PISSN: 19373384     EISSN: 19373392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2015.0442     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Breast Cancer. American Cancer Society 2014. Retrieved from www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/.003090-pdf.pdf; Last accessed on March. 2 2016.
2. The Breast Cancer Landscape. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program 2016. Retreived from http://.cdmrp.army.mil/bcrp/pdfs/bc-landscape.pdf; Last accessed March. 2 2016.
3. World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest world cancer statistics-global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed. World Health Organization Press Release N 223, 2013.
4. Siegel R.L, Miller K.D, and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer J Clin. 65, 5, 2015.
5. Bombonati A, and Sgroi D.C. The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression. J Pathol. 223, 307, 2011.
6. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society 2015.
7. Wang C, Tang Z, Zhao Y, Yao R, Li L, and Sun W. Three-dimensional in vitro cancer models: a short review. Biofabrication. 6, 022001, 2014.
8. Pampaloni F, Reynaud E.G, and Stelzer E.H. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 8, 839, 2007.
9. Baker B.M, and Chen C.S. Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci. 125, 3015, 2012.
10. Tibbitt M.W, and Anseth K.S. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 103, 655, 2009.
11. Asghar, W, El Assal R, Shafiee H, Pitteri S, Paulmurugan R, and Demirci U. Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models. Mater Today. 18, 539, 2015.
12. Hickman J.A, Graeser R, de Hoogt R, Vidic S, Brito C, Gutekunst M, van der Kuip H, and Consortium I.P. Three-dimensional models of cancer for pharmacology and cancer cell biology: capturing tumor complexity in vitro/ex vivo. Biotechnol J. 9, 1115, 2014.
13. Kim J.B, Stein R, and O?Hare M.J. Three-dimensional in vitro tissue culture models of breast cancer-A review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 85, 281, 2004.
14. Kim J.B. Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 15, 365, 2005.
15. Debnath J, Muthuswamy S.K, and Brugge J.S. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods. 30, 256, 2003.
16. Weigelt B, Ghajar C.M, and Bissell M.J. The need for complex 3D culture models to unravel novel pathways and identify accurate biomarkers in breast cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 69-70, 42, 2014.
17. Nikkhah M, Strobl J.S, and Agah M. Attachment and response of human fibroblast and breast cancer cells to three dimensional silicon microstructures of different geometries. Biomed Microdevices. 11, 429, 2009.
18. Rumpler M, Woesz A, Dunlop J.W, van Dongen J.T, and Fratzl P. The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. J R Soc Interface. 5, 1173, 2008.
19. Serbo J.V, Kuo S, Lewis S, Lehmann M, Li J, Gracias D.H, and Romer L.H. Patterning of fibroblast and matrix anisotropy within 3d confinement is driven by the cytoskeleton. Adv Healthc Mater. 5, 146, 2016.
20. Nelson C.M, Vanduijn M.M, Inman J.L, Fletcher D.A, and Bissell M.J. Tissue geometry determines sites of mammary branching morphogenesis in organotypic cultures. Science. 314, 298, 2006.
21. Bischel L.L, Sung K.E, Jimenez-Torres J.A, Mader B, Keely P.J, and Beebe D.J. The importance of being a lumen. FASEB J. 28, 4583, 2014.
22. Jamal M, Kadam S.S, Xiao R, Jivan F, Onn T.M, Fernandes R, Nguyen T.D, and Gracias D.H. Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers. Adv Healthc Mater. 2, 1142, 2013.
23. Xi W, Schmidt C.K, Sanchez S, Gracias D.H, Carazo-Salas R.E, Jackson S.P, and Schmidt O.G. Rolled-up functionalized nanomembranes as three-dimensional cavities for single cell studies. Nano Lett. 14, 4197, 2014.
24. Verbridge S.S, Chakrabarti A, DelNero P, Kwee B, Varner J.D, Stroock A.D, and Fischbach C. Physicochemical regulation of endothelial sprouting in a 3D microfluidic angiogenesis model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 101, 2948, 2013.
25. Bischel L.L, Beebe D.J, and Sung K.E. Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure. BMC Cancer. 15, 12, 2015.
26. Seunarine K, Meredith D.O, Riehle M.O, Wilkinson C.D.W, and Gadegaard N. Biodegradable polymer tubes with lithographically controlled 3D micro-And nanotopography. Microelectron Eng. 85, 1350, 2008.
27. Papenburg B.J, Liu J, Higuera G.A, Barradas A.M, de Boer J, van Blitterswijk C.A, Wessling M, and Stamatialis D. Development and analysis of multi-layer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 30, 6228, 2009.
28. Deng M, Kumbar S.G, Nair L.S, Weikel A.L, Allcock H.R, and Laurencin C.T. Biomimetic structures: biological implications of dipeptide-substituted polyphosphazenepolyester blend nanofiber matrices for load-bearing bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 21, 2641, 2011.
29. Shih Y.H, Yang J.C, Li S.H, Yang W.C.V, and Chen C.C. Bio-electrospinning of poly(l-lactic acid) hollow fibrous membrane. Text Res J. 82, 602, 2012.
30. He X.H, Wang W, Deng K, Xie R, Ju X.J, Liu Z, and Chu L.Y. Microfluidic fabrication of chitosan microfibers with controllable internals from tubular to peapodlike structures. RSC Adv. 5, 928, 2015.
31. Oh J, Kim K, Won S.W, Cha C, Gaharwar A.K, Selimovic S, Bae H, Lee K.H, Lee D.H, Lee S.H, and Khademhosseini A. Microfluidic fabrication of cell adhesive chitosan microtubes. Biomed Microdevices. 15, 465, 2013.
32. Song Y, Kamphuis M.M, Zhang Z, Sterk L.M, Vermes I, Poot A.A, Feijen J, and Grijpma D.W. Flexible and elastic porous poly(trimethylene carbonate) structures for use in vascular tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 6, 1269, 2010.
33. Ma X.H, Xu Z.L, Wu F, and Xu H.T. PFSA-TiO2(or Al2O3)-PVA/PVA/PAN difunctional hollow fiber composite membranes prepared by dip-coating method. Iran Polym J. 21, 31, 2012.
34. Yue T, Nakajima M, Takeuchi M, Hu C, Huang Q, and Fukuda T. On-chip self-Assembly of cell embedded microstructures to vascular-likemicrotubes. LabChip. 14, 1151, 2014.
35. Silva J.M, Duarte A.R, Custodio C.A, Sher P, Neto A.I, Pinho A.C, Fonseca J, Reis R.L, and Mano J.F. Nanostructured hollow tubes based on chitosan and alginate multilayers. Adv Healthc Mater. 3, 433, 2014.
36. Ozawa F, Ino K, Takahashi Y, Shiku H, and Matsue T. Electrodeposition of alginate gels for construction of vascular-like structures. J Biosci Bioeng. 115, 459, 2013.
37. Soletti L, Hong Y, Guan J, Stankus J.J, El-Kurdi M.S, Wagner W.R, and Vorp D.A. A bilayered elastomeric scaffold for tissue engineering of small diameter vascular grafts. Acta Biomater. 6, 110, 2010.
38. Zhang Y, Yu Y, and Ozbolat I.T. Direct bioprinting of vessel-like tubular microfluidic channels. J Nanotechnol Eng Med. 4, 020902, 2013.
39. Arayanarakool R., Meyer A.K, Helbig L, Sanchez S, and Schmidt O.G. Tailoring three-dimensional architectures by rolled-up nanotechnology for mimicking microvasculatures. Lab Chip. 15, 2981, 2015.
40. Zhu J, and Marchant R.E. Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev Med Devices. 8, 607, 2011.
41. Nguyen K.T, and West J.L. Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 23, 4307, 2002.
42. Annabi N, Nichol J.W, Zhong X, Ji C, Koshy S, Khademhosseini A, and Dehghani F. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 16, 371, 2010.
43. Drury J.L, and Mooney D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 24, 4337, 2003.
44. Serbo J.V, and Gerecht S. Vascular tissue engineering: biodegradable scaffold platforms to promote angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 4, 8, 2013.
45. Malachowski K, Breger J, Kwag H.R, Wang M.O, Fisher J.P, Selaru F.M, and Gracias D.H. Stimuliresponsive theragrippers for chemomechanical controlled release. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 53, 8045, 2014.
46. Zakharchenko S, Sperling E, and Ionov L. Fully biodegradable self-rolled polymer tubes: a candidate for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 12, 2211, 2011.
47. Breger J.C, Yoon C, Xiao R, Kwag H.R, Wang M.O, Fisher J.P, Nguyen T.D, and Gracias D.H. Self-folding thermo-magnetically responsive soft microgrippers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 7, 3398, 2015.
48. Bassik N, Brafman A, Zarafshar A.M, Jamal M, Luvsanjav D, Selaru F.M, and Gracias D.H. Enzymatically triggered actuation of miniaturized tools. J Am Chem Soc. 132, 16314, 2010.
49. Baek K, Jeong J.H, Shkumatov A, Bashir R, and Kong H. In situ self-folding assembly of a multi-walled hydrogel tube for uniaxial sustained molecular release. Adv Mater. 25, 5568, 2013.
50. Zhao C, Lin Z, Yin H, Ma Y, Xu F, and Yang W. PEG molecular net-cloth grafted on polymeric substrates and its bio-merits. Sci Rep. 4, 4982, 2014.
51. Le Goff G.C, Srinivas R.L, Hill W.A, and Doyle P.S. Hydrogelmicroparticles for biosensing. Eur PolymJ. 72, 386, 2015.
52. Rusby J, Brachtel E, Michaelson J, Koerner F, and Smith B. Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: threedimensional patterns and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 106, 171, 2007.
53. Ramsay D.T, Kent J.C, Owens R.A, and Hartmann P.E. Ultrasound imaging of milk ejection in the breast of lactating women. Pediatrics. 113, 361, 2004.
54. Ramsay D.T, Kent J.C, Hartmann R.A, and Hartman P.E. Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging. J Anat. 206, 525, 2005.
55. Nemir S, Hayenga H.N, and West J.L. PEGDA hydrogels with patterned elasticity: novel tools for the study of cell response to substrate rigidity.BiotechnolBioeng 105 636 2010.
56. Hwang N.S, Varghese S, Zhang Z, and Elisseeff J. Chondrogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cells in arginine-glycine-Aspartate-modified hydrogels. Tissue Eng. 12, 2695, 2006.
57. Albrecht D.R, Tsang V.L, Sah R.L, and Bhatia S.N. Photo-And electropatterning of hydrogel-encapsulated living cell arrays. Lab Chip. 5, 111, 2005.
58. Panda P, Ali S, Lo E, Chung B.G, Hatton T.A, Khademhosseini A, and Doyle P.S. Stop-flow lithography to generate cell-laden microgel particles. Lab Chip. 8, 1056, 2008.
59. Ali S, Saik J.E, Gould D.J, Dickinson M.E, and West J.L. Immobilization of cell-Adhesive laminin peptides in degradable PEGDA hydrogels influences endothelial cell tubulogenesis. Biores Open Access. 2, 241, 2013.
60. Munoz-Pinto D.J, Jimenez-Vergara A.C, Gharat T.P, and Hahn M.S. Characterization of sequential collagenpoly( ethylene glycol) diacrylate interpenetrating networks and initial assessment of their potential for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 40, 32, 2015.
61. Bader R.A., Herzog K.T, and Kao W.J.Astudy of diffusion in poly(ethyleneglycol)-gelatin based semi-interpenetrating networks for use in wound healing Polym Bull (Berl) 62, 381, 2009.
62. Cuchiara M.P, Allen A.C, Chen T.M, Miller J.S, and West J.L. Multilayer microfluidic PEGDA hydrogels. Biomaterials. 31, 5491, 2010.
63. Grover C.N, Gwynne J.H, Pugh N, Hamaia S, Farndale R.W, Best S.M, and Cameron R.E. Crosslinking and composition influence the surface properties, mechanical stiffness and cell reactivity of collagen-based films. Acta Biomater. 8, 3080, 2012.
64. Nichol J.W, Koshy S.T, Bae H, Hwang C.M, Yamanlar S, and Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 31, 5536, 2010.
65. Pan H, Wanami L.S, Dissanayake T.R, and Bachelder R.E. Autocrine semaphorin3A stimulates alpha2 beta1 integrin expression/function in breast tumor cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 118, 197, 2009.
66. Neve R.M, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner F.L, Fevr T, Clark L, Bayani N, Coppe J.P, Tong F, Speed T, Spellman P.T, DeVries S, Lapuk A, Wang N.J, Kuo W.L, Stilwell J.L, Pinkel D, Albertson D.G, Waldman F.M, McCormick F, Dickson R.B, Johnson M.D, Lippman M, Ethier S, Gazdar A, and Gray J.W. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell. 10, 515, 2006.
67. Comparison of All Genes in Neve CellLine Oncomine Research Edition. www.oncomine.org
68. Schnitt S.J, and Collins L.C. Biopsy Interpretation of the Breast. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.
69. Kalluri R, and Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 6, 392, 2006.