Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 48-61

  Vesper, Cordula ^a   van der Wel, Robrecht P R D ^b   Knoblich, Günther ^a,c   Sebanz, Natalie ^a,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Action simulation; Coordination strategies; Joint action; Jumping; Prediction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875807833     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028066     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109-1116. doi:10.1038/nn.2182
2. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Freund, H.-J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400-404.
3. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grézes, J., Passingham, R., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249. doi:10.1093/ cercor/bhi007
4. Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69-74. doi:10.1016/ j.cub.2005.10.071
5. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cross, E. S., de C. Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage, 31, 1257-1267. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033
7. Cross, E. S., Kraemer, D. J. M., de C. Hamilton, A. F., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 315-326. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn083
8. Feldman, A. G., & Latash, M. L. (2005). Testing hypotheses and the advancement of science: Recent attempts to falsify the equilibrium point hypothesis. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 91-103. doi:10.1007/ s00221-004-2049-0
9. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391. doi:10.1037/h0055392
10. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 1688-1703.
11. Gomi, H., & Kawato, M. (1996). Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm-stiffness during multi-joint movement. Science, 272, 117-120. doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.117
12. Grézes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1-19. doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12: 11::AID-HBM103.0.CO;2-V
13. Juras, G., Slomka, K., & Latash, M. (2009). Violations of Fitts' law in a ballistic task. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 41, 525-528. doi:10.3200/ 35-08-015
14. Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203, 1029-1031. doi:10.1126/ science.424729
15. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522-525. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
16. Kilner, J. M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S. J., & Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1299-1301. doi:10.1038/nn1355
17. Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 54 (pp. 59-101), Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
18. Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467-472. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00387
19. Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1006 -1016. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006
20. Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2220-2230. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.497843
21. Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2010). Favouritism in the motor system: Social interaction modulates action simulation. Biology Letters, 6, 758-761. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478
22. Oullier, O., de Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3, 178-192. doi:10.1080/17470910701563392
23. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154. doi:10.1080/713752551
24. Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 85-90. doi: 10.1038/nn1168
25. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity: How pianists recognize their own performances. Psychological Science, 15, 604-609. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00727.x
26. Richardson, M. J., Campbell, W. L., & Schmidt, R. (2009). Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 449, 117-122. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.092
27. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and actualizing Intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 845- 859. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.845
28. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R., & Schmidt, R. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867-891. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
29. Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709-734. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.709
30. Schmidt, R. C., Bienvenu, M., Fitzpatrick, P. A., & Amazeen, E. G. (1998). A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: Coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 884-900. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.884
31. Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 227-247. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.227
32. Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics. In: A. Fuchs & V. K. Jirsa (Eds.) Dynamics of interpersonal coordination (pp. 281-308). Berlin / Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
33. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
34. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234-1246. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234
35. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 360-366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009
36. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393- 10398. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503903102
37. van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Let the force be with us: Dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1420-1431. doi:10.1037/a0022337
38. Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23, 998-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002
39. Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: Reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 517-530. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2706-z
40. Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1031-1057.
41. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychonomic Bulletin, 131, 460-473. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460
42. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 358, 593-602. doi:10.1098/ rstb.2002.1238
43. Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, R729-R732. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8
44. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212-1217. doi: 10.1038/81497