Dutch elm disease in New Zealand: impacts from eradication and management programmes

Plant Pathology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1047-1055

  Ganley, R J ^a   Bulman, L S ^a  

^a SCION   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

disease management; Dutch elm disease; eradication; Ophiostoma novo ulmi

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; COST ANALYSIS; DECIDUOUS TREE; DISEASE CONTROL; FUNGAL DISEASE; PATHOGENICITY; PROTEIN;

NEW ZEALAND;

OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS;

EID: 84963600652     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: 13653059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12527     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Bain J, 1991. Dutch elm disease – the New Zealand experience. In: Arthur TE, Hitchmough JD, eds. Does the Elm Have a Future in Australia? Burnley, Australia: Victorian College of Agriculture and Horticulture, 40–4.
2. Brasier CM, 1979. Dual origin of recent Dutch elm disease outbreaks in Europe. Nature 281, 78–80.
3. Brasier CM, 1983. A cytoplasmically transmitted disease of Ceratocystis ulmi. Nature 305, 220–3.
4. Brasier CM, 1986a. A comparison of pathogenicity and cultural characteristics of the EAN and NAN aggressive subgroups of Ophiostoma ulmi. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 87, 1–5.
5. Brasier CM, 1986b. The d-factor in Ceratocystis ulmi: its biological characteristics and implications for Dutch elm disease. In: Buck KW, ed. Fungal Virology. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 177–208.
6. Brasier CM, 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp nov. – causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115, 151–61.
7. Brasier CM, 1996. New horizons in Dutch elm disease control. In: Report on Forest Research 1996. London, UK: HMSO, 20–8.
8. Brasier C, 2000a. Viruses as biological control agents of the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. In: Dunne CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 201–12.
9. Brasier CM, 2000b. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 61–72.
10. Brasier CM, Kirk SA, Pipe ND, Buck KW, 1998. Rare interspecific hybrids in natural populations of the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi. Mycological Research 102, 45–57.
11. Brunet J, Zalapa JE, Pecori F, Santini A, 2013. Hybridization and introgression between the exotic Siberian elm, Ulmus pumila, and the native field elm, U. minor, in Italy. Biological Invasions 15, 2717–30.
12. Cannon WN, Worley DP, 1976. Dutch Elm Disease Control: Performance and Costs. USDA Forest Service research paper NE-345. Upper Darby, PA, USA: USDA.
13. Donovan GH, Butry DT, 2010. Trees in the city: valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 94, 77–83.
14. Gadgil PD, Bulman LS, Dick MA, Bain J, Dunn CP, 2000. Dutch elm disease in New Zealand. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 189–99.
15. Gibbs JN, 1978. Development of the Dutch elm disease epidemic in southern England, 1971–6. Annals of Applied Biology 88, 219–28.
16. Gibbs J, Brasier C, Webber J, 1994. Dutch Elm Disease in Britain. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 252. Farnham, UK: Forestry Authority.
17. Government of Alberta, 2001. Dutch elm disease. [http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/prm1043?opendocument]. Accessed 9 March 2016.
18. Harwood TD, Tomlinson I, Potter CA, Knight JD, 2011. Dutch elm disease revisited: past, present and future management in Great Britain. Plant Pathology 60, 545–55.
19. Herriot EM, 1919. A history of Hagley Park, Christchurch, with special reference to its botany. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 51, 427–47.
20. Heybroek HM, 1993. Why bother about the elm? In: Sticklen MB, Sherald JL, eds. Dutch Elm Disease Research – Cellular and Molecular Approaches. New York, USA: Springer, 1–8.
21. Hintz WE, Carneiro JS, Kassatenko I, Varga A, James D, 2013. Two novel mitoviruses from a Canadian isolate of the Dutch elm pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi (93-1224). Virology Journal 10, 252.
22. Hollingsworth PM, Hollingsworth ML, Coleman M, 2000. The European elms: molecular markers, population genetics, and biosystematics. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms – Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. New York, USA: J. Chapman and Hall, 3–20.
23. Hubbes M, 2004. Induced resistance for the control of Dutch elm disease. Investigacion Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13, 185–96.
24. Karps J, Darling J, Allen M, Hill N, Montegna A, Seyb C, 2007. Portland's Urban Forest Canopy. Assessment and Public Tree Evaluation. Portland, OR, USA: Portland Parks & Recreation.
25. Laverne RJ, Winson-Geideman K, 2003. The influence of trees and landscaping on rental rates at office buildings. Journal of Arboriculture 29, 281–90.
26. Magasi LP, Harrison KJ, Urquhart DA, Murray DM, 1993. Three Decades of Dutch elm Disease in Fredericton, N.B. Information Report M-X-185E. Fredericton, Canada: Department of Natural Resources Canada.
27. Ministry for Primary Industries, 2008. MAFBNZ no longer funding Dutch elm disease programme. [http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/biosec/pubs-news/pubs/biosecurity/issue-86/dutch-elm]. Accessed 13 April 2015.
28. Paoletti M, Buck KW, Brasier CM, 2006. Selective acquisition of novel mating type and vegetative incompatibility genes via interspecies gene transfer in the globally invading eukaryote Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Molecular Ecology 15, 249–62.
29. Peacock JW, 1981. Citywide mass trapping of Scolytus multistriatus with multilure. In: Kondo ES, Hiratsuka Y, Denyer WBG, eds. Proceedings of the Dutch Elm Disease Symposium Workshop, 1981. Winnipeg, Canada: Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, 406–26.
30. Pearson MN, Beever RE, Boine B, Arthur K, 2009. Mycoviruses of filamentous fungi and their relevance to plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology 10, 115–28.
31. Rioux D, 2003. Dutch elm disease in Canada: distribution, impact on urban areas and research. Proceedings of the XII World Forestry Congress, 2003. Quebec City, Canada, 0274-B1.
32. Santini A, Faccoli M, 2015. Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association. iForests 8, 126–34.
33. Santini A, Pecori F, Pepori A, Brookes A, 2012. Morfeo elm: a new variety resistant to Dutch elm disease. Forest Pathology 42, 171–6.
34. Scheffer RJ, Brakenhoff AC, Kerkenaar A, Elgersma DM, 1988. Dutch elm disease control by the sterol biosynthesis inhibitiors fenpropimorph and fenpropidin. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 94, 164–73.
35. Scheffer RJ, Voeten JGWF, Guries RP, 2008. Biological control of Dutch elm disease. Plant Disease 92, 192–200.
36. Shukla MR, Jones AMP, Sullivan JA, Liu CZ, Gosling S, Saxena PK, 2012. In vitro conservation of American elm (Ulmus americana): potential role of auxin metabolism in sustained plant proliferation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42, 686–97.
37. Sutherland ML, Brasier CM, 1995. Effect of d-factors on in vitro cerato-ulmin production by the Dutch elm disease pathogen, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Mycological Research 99, 1211–17.
38. Sutherland ML, Brasier CM, 1997. A comparison of thirteen d-factors as potential biological control agents of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Pathology 46, 680–93.
39. Sutherland ML, Mittempergher L, Brasier CM, 1995. Control of Dutch elm disease by induced host resistance. European Journal of Forest Pathology 25, 307–18.
40. Thompson R, Hanna R, Noel J, Piirto D, 1999. Valuation of tree aesthetics on small urban-interface properties. Journal of Arboriculture 25, 225–34.
41. Treeby B, 1997. Urban Tree Estate Amenity Values and Pest Risk. New Zealand Ministry of Forestry.
42. Vesely E, 2007. Green for green: the perceived value of a quantitative change in the urban tree estate of New Zealand. Ecological Economics 63, 605–15.
43. Webber JF, 2004. Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease. Investigacion Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13, 197–205.
44. Webber JF, Sticklen MB, Sherald JL, 1993. D factors and their potential for controlling Dutch elm disease. In: Sticklen MB, Sherald JL, eds. Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 322–32.
45. Westwood AR, 1991. A cost benefit analysis of Manitoba's integrated Dutch elm disease management program 1975–1990. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Manitoba 47, 44–59.