Hybridization and introgression between the exotic Siberian elm, Ulmus pumila, and the native Field elm, U. minor, in Italy

Biological Invasions

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2717-2730

  Brunet, Johanne ^a   Zalapa, Juan E ^a   Pecori, Francesco ^b   Santini, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dutch elm disease; Field elm; Hybridization; Introgression; Microsatellites; Siberian elm

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION;

ITALY;

ULMUS; ULMUS PUMILA;

EID: 84888067340     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-013-0486-z     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217-1229.
2. Ansaloni A (1934) La moria degli olmi e la diffusione in Italia dell'olmo siberiano. Bologna Ed. La Selva 119 pp.
3. Brasier CM (1988) Ophiostoma ulmi, cause of Dutch elm disease. Adv Plant Pathol 6: 207-221.
4. Brasier CM (1991) Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115: 151-161.
5. Burgess KS, Morgan M, Deverno L, Husband BC (2005) Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Mol Ecol 14: 3471-3483.
6. Cogolludo-Agustin MA, Agundez D, Gil L (2000) Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85: 157-166.
7. Collada C, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Gil L, Cervera MT (2004) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Ulmus minor Miller and cross-amplification in U. glabra Hudson and U. laevis Pall. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 731-732.
8. Collevatti RS, Grattapaglia D, Duvall Hay J (2001) High resolution microsatellite based analysis of the mating system allows the detection of significant biparental inbreeding in Caryocar brasiliense, an endangered tropical tree species. Heredity 86: 60-67.
9. Collin E (2002) Strategies and guidelines for the conservation of the genetic resources of Ulmus spp. In: Turok J, Eriksson G, Russell K, Borelli S (eds) Noble Hardwoods Network, 50-67, Report of the fourth meeting, September 1999, Gmunden, Austria, and the fifth meeting, May 2001, Blessington, Ireland. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
10. Crowl TA, Crist TO, Parmenter RR, Belovsky G, Lugo AE (2008) The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front Ecol Environ 6: 238-246.
11. Daehler C, Strong D (1997) Hybridization between introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alternifl ora; Poaceae) and native California cordgrass (S. foliosa) in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Am J Bot 84: 607-611.
12. Ding J, Reardon R, Wu Y, Zheng H, Fu W (2006) Biological control of invasive plants through collaboration between China and the United States of America: a perspective. Biol Invasions 8: 1439-1450.
13. Ellstrand NC, Elam D (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24: 217-242.
14. Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck K (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? PNAS 97: 7043-7050.
15. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
16. Goidanich G (1936) La moria dell'olmo (Graphium ulmi). Ramo editoriale degli agricoltori, Roma 134 pp.
17. Goidanich G (1941) Il problema della grafiosi dell'olmo nella fase risolutiva. Annali della R. Accademia di agricoltura di Bologna 1: 3-23.
18. Goidanich G, Azzaroli F (1941) Relazione sulle esperienze di selezione di olmi resistenti alla grafiosi e di inoculazioni artificiali di Graphium ulmi eseguite nel 1939-1940. Boll R Staz Pat Veg 21: 287-306.
19. Goodall-Copestake WP, Hollingsworth ML, Jenkins GI, Collin E (2005) Molecular markers and ex situ conservation of the European elms (Ulmus spp.). Biol Conserv 122: 537-546.
20. Hedge SG, Nason JD, Clegg JM, Ellstrand NC (2006) The evolution of California's wild radish has resulted in the extinction of its progenitors. Evolution 60: 1187-1197.
21. Heybroek HM (1968) Taxonomy, crossability and breeding of elms. Typescript presented at international symposium on Dutch elm disease, Ames, Iowa, 26-28 Feb, pp 25.
22. Kamen H (1997) Philip of Spain. Ed. espanola, Siglo XXI de Espana editores, Madrid.
23. Keim P, Paige KN, Whitham TG, Lark KG (1989) Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm of Populus: Occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123: 557-565.
24. Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972a) Response of Ulmus pumila and U. pumila X U. rubra hybrids to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62: 848-852.
25. Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972b) Variation in ornamental traits and disease tolerance among crosses of Ulmus pumila, U. rubra and putative natural hybrids. Silvae Genetica 21: 193-197.
26. Machon N, Lefranc M, Bilger I, Mazer SJ, Sarr A (1997) Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: analysis of differentiation. Heredity 78: 12-20.
27. Mittempergher L, La Porta N (1991) Hybridization studies in the Eurasian Species of Elm (Ulmus spp.). Silvae Genetica 40: 237-243.
28. Mittempergher L, Santini A (2004) The history of elm breeding. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 161-177.
29. Passavalli L (1935) L'olmo siberiano (Ulmus pumila L.). Sua importanza nella difesa da Ceratostomella (Graphium) ulmi Buis. L'Alpe 22: 409-418.
30. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
31. Prentis PJ, White EM, Radford IJ, Lowe AJ, Clarke AR (2007) Can hybridization cause local extinction: a case for demographic swamping of the Australian native Senecio pinnatifolius by the invasive Senecio madagascariensis?. New Phytol 176: 902-912.
32. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
33. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27: 83-109.
34. Rieseberg LH, Zona S, Aberbom L, Martin TD (1989) Hybridization in the island endemic, Catalina mahogany. Conserv Biol 3: 52-58.
35. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C (2003) Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
36. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O'Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 305-332.
37. Santamour FS Jr, Bentz SE (1995) Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America. J Arboric 21: 122-131.
38. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Mittempergher L (2002) 'San Zanobi' and 'Plinio' elmtrees. HortScience 37: 1139-1141.
39. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2005) Variation among Italian and French elm clones in their response to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi inoculation. Forest Pathol 35: 183-193.
40. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2007) 'Fiorente' and 'Arno' Elm trees. HortScience 42: 712-714.
41. Santini A, La Porta N, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2008) Breeding against Dutch elm disease adapted to the Mediterranean climate. Euphytica 163: 45-56.
42. Sibilia C (1930) La moria degli olmi in Italia. Boll R Staz Pat Veg 10: 281-283.
43. Sibilia C (1932) La resistenza dell'Ulmuspumila a Ceratostomellaulmi. Boll R Staz Pat Veg 11: 360-364.
44. Smalley EB, Guries RP (1993) Breeding elms for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol 31: 325-352.
45. Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Buron M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Vanden Broeck A (2005) Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For Sci 51: 134-141.
46. USDA, NRCS. 2002. PLANTS Database, version 3. 5. Online, website http://plants. usda. gov. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, US.
47. Vila M, Weber E, D'Antonio CM (2000) Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2: 207-217.
48. Ware GH (1995) Little-known elms from China: landscape tree possibilities. J Arboric 21: 284-288.
49. Whiteley RE, Black-Samuelsson S, Clapham D (2003) Development of microsatellite markers for the European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) and cross-species amplification within the genus Ulmus. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 598-600.
50. Wiegrefe, SJ (1992) Molecular genetic variation in the Ulmaceae: phylogenetic implications. Ph. D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
51. Wyman D (1951) Elms grown in America. Arnoldia 11: 79-93.
52. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2008a) Genetic diversity and relationships among Dutch elm disease tolerant Ulmus pumila L. accessions from China. Genome 51: 492-500.
53. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2008b) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for red elm (Ulmus rubra Muhl.) and cross-species amplification with Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.). Molec Ecol Res 8: 109-112.
54. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2009) Patterns of hybridization and introgression between invasive Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae) and native U. rubra. Am J Bot 96: 1116-1128.
55. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2010) The extent of hybridization and its impact on the genetic diversity and population structure of an invasive tree, Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae). Evol Appl 3: 157-168.