Dutch elm disease revisited: Past, present and future management in Great Britain

Plant Pathology

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 545-555

  Harwood, T D ^a,b,c   Tomlinson, I ^b,c   Potter, C A ^b,c   Knight, J D ^b,c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Ophiostoma novo ulmi; Spatial modelling; Ulmus

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; DISEASE CONTROL; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FUNGAL DISEASE; FUNGUS; MORTALITY; NEW SPECIES; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; REGENERATION;

UNITED KINGDOM;

FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS;

EID: 79955530144     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: 13653059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02391.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Botanical Society of the British Isles, 1930-2000. Atlas: Accessed via National Biodiversity Network 10th June 2008. Hectad and Tetrad maps.
2. Brasier CM, 1983. The future of Dutch elm disease in Europe. In: Burdekin DA, ed. Research on Dutch Elm Disease in Europe. Vol. 60. UK: Forestry Commission Bulletin, 96-104.
3. Brasier CM, 1996. New Horizons in Dutch Elm Disease Control. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission: Report on ForestResearch.
4. Brasier CM, 2008. The biodiversity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathology 57, 792-808.
5. Brasier CM, Gibbs JN, 1973. Origin of the Dutch elm disease in Britain. Nature 242, 607-9.
6. Brasier CM, Gibbs JN, 1978. Origin and development of the current Dutch elm disease epidemic. In: Scott PR, Bainbridge A, eds. Plant Disease Epidemiology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 31-4.
7. Brasier CM, Kirk SA, 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 899, 205-15.
8. Byers JA, 2000. Wind-aided dispersal of simulated bark beetles flying through forests. Ecological Modelling 125, 231-43.
9. Carrasco LR, Harwood TD, Toepfer S et al., 2010. Dispersal kernels of the invasive alien western corn rootworm and the effectiveness of buffer zones in eradication programmes in Europe. Annals of Applied Biology 156, 63-77.
10. Gadgil PD, Bulman LS, Dick MA, Bain J, 2000. Dutch elm disease in New Zealand. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 189-200.
11. Gibbs JN, 1978a. Development of the Dutch elm disease epidemic in southern England, 1971-6. Annals of Applied Biology 88, 219-28.
12. Gibbs JN, 1978b. Intercontinental epidemiology of Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 16, 287-307.
13. Gibbs JN, Brasier CM, 1973. Correlation between cultural characters and pathogenicity in Ceratocystis ulmi from Britain, Europe and America. Nature 242, 381-3.
14. Gibbs JN, Howell RS, 1972. Dutch Elm Disease Survey 1971. London, UK: HMSO: Forestry Commission Forest Record 82.
15. Gibbs JN, Howell RS, 1974. Dutch Elm Disease Survey 1972-1973. London, UK: HMSO: Forestry Commission Forest Record 100.
16. Greig BJW, 1994. English Elm Regeneration. Farnham, UK: DoE Arboricultural Advisory and Information Service. Arboriculture Research Note 13.
17. Harwood TD, Xu X, Pautasso M, Jeger MJ, Shaw MW, 2009. Epidemiological risk assessment using linked network and grid based modelling. Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae in the UK. Ecological Modelling 220, 3353-61.
18. Jones P, 1981. The geography of Dutch elm disease in Britain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 6, 324-36.
19. Locke GM, 1970. Forestry Commission Census of Woodlands 1965-67. A Report on Britain's Forest Resources. London, UK: HMSO.
20. Mitchell B, Markovic D, Rotheray D, Measho S, Barros J, 2009. Dutch elm disease on the Isle of Man - identifying 'danger-spots' using an agent-based model. In: Lees BG, Laffan SW, eds. 10th International Conference on GeoComputation. UNSW, Sydney: November-December, 2009.
21. Neubert MG, Caswell H, 2000. Demography and dispersal: calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81, 1613-28.
22. Peace TR, 1960. The Status and Development of Elm Disease in Britain. London, UK: HMSO, Forestry Commission Bulletin: 33, 1-44.
23. Peterken GF, Mountford EP, 1998. Long term change in an unmanaged population of wych elm subjected to Dutch elm disease. Journal of Ecology 86, 205-18.
24. Plant RE, Cunningham RT, 1991. Analyses of the dispersal of sterile Mediterranean fruit-flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) released from a point-source. Environmental Entomology 20, 1493-503.
25. Pomerleau R, 1961. History of the Dutch elm disease in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Forestry Chronicle 37, 356-67.
26. Redfern DB, 1977. Dutch elm disease in Scotland. Scottish Forestry 31, 105-9.
27. Sarre P, 1978. The diffusion of Dutch elm disease. Area 10, 81-5.
28. Shaw MW, Harwood TD, Wilkinson MJ, Elliott L, 2006. Assembling spatially explicit landscape models of pollen and spore dispersal by wind for risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273, 1705-13.
29. Smith KE, Wall R, 1998. Estimates of population density and dispersal in the blowfly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 65-73.
30. Stipes RJ, 2000. The management of Dutch elm disease. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 157-72.
31. Swinton J, Gilligan CA, 1996. Dutch elm disease and the future of the elm in the UK: a quantitative analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 351, 605-15.
32. Swinton J, Gilligan CA, 1999. Selecting hyperparasites for biocontrol of Dutch elm disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266, 437-45.
33. Swinton J, Gilligan CA, 2000. A modelling approach to the epidemiology of Dutch elm disease. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 73-102.
34. Tomlinson I, Potter C, 2010. 'Too little, too late'? Science, policy and Dutch elm disease in the UK. Journal of Historical Geography 36, 121-31.
35. Webber JF, 1990. Relative effectiveness of Scolytus scolytus, S. multistriatus and S. kirshi as vectors of Dutch elm disease. European Journal of Forest Pathology 20, 184-92.
36. Webber JF, 2000. Insect vector behaviour and the evolution of Dutch elm disease. In: Dunn CP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 47-60.
37. Webber JF, Brasier CM, 1984. The transmission of Dutch elm disease: a study of the processes involved. In: Anderson JM, Rayner ADM, Walton D, eds. Invertebrate-Microbial Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 271-306.