Effects of hydrolysed yeasts on ruminal fermentation in the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)

Veterinarni Medicina

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 195-203

  Oeztuerk, H ^a   Emre, B ^a   Breves, G ^b  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fermentation; Hydrolysed yeast; Rumen; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963594952     PISSN: 03758427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/8820-VETMED     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abdl-Rahman MA (2010): In vitro manipulation of rumen fermentation efficiency by fumaric acid-bentonite coupled addition as an alternative to antibiotics. Journal of Agricultural Science 2, 174-180.
2. th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
3. Bach A, Iglesias C, Devant M (2007): Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 136, 146-153.
4. Breves G, Faul K, Schroder B, Holst H, Caspary WF, Stein J (2000): Application of the colon-simulation technique for studying the effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on basic parameters of porcine cecal microbial metabolism disturbed by clindamycin. Digestion 61, 193-200.
5. Carro MD, Lebzien P, Rohr K (1992): Influence of yeast culture on the in vitro fermentation (Rusitec) of diets containing variable portions of concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37, 209-220.
6. Czerkawski JW, Breckenridge G (1977): Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 371-384.
7. Durix A, Jean-Blain C, Sallmann HP, Jouany JP (1991): Use of a semicontinuous culture system (Rusitec) to study the metabolism of ethanol in the rumen and its effects on ruminal digestion. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71, 115-123.
8. Faverdin P (1999): The effect of nutrients on feed intake in ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58, 523-531.
9. Hegarty RS (1999): Mechanisms for competitively reducing ruminal methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1299-1306.
10. Hristov AN, Varga G, Cassidy T, Long M, Heyler K, Karnati SKR, Corl B, Hovde CJ, Yoon I (2010): Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on ruminal fermentation and nutrient utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 682-692.
11. Jouany JP, Mathieu F, Senaud J, Bohatier J, Bertin G, Mercier M (1998): The effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergilus oryzae on the digestion of the cell wall fraction of a mixed diet in defaunated and refaunated sheep rumen. Reproduction Nutrition Development 38, 401-416.
12. Lascano GJ, Heinrichs AJ (2007): Yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation in growing animals in the dairy industry. CAB Reviews Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources 2, 049.
13. Lila ZA, Mohammed N, Yasui T, Kurokawa Y, Kanda S, Itabashi H (2004): Effects of a twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 82, 1847-1854.
14. Marden JP, Julien C, Monteils V, Auclair E, Moncoulon R, Bayourthe C (2008): How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high yielding dairy cows? Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3528-3535.
15. Martin SA, Nisbet DJ, Dean RG (1989): Influence of a commercial yeast supplement on the in vitro ruminal fermentation. Nutrition Reports International 40, 395-403.
16. Miller-Webster T, Hoover WH, Holt M, Nocek JE (2002): Influence of yeast culture on ruminal microbial metabolism in continuous culture. Journal Dairy Science 85, 2009-2014.
17. Mutsvangwa T, Edwards IE, Topps JH, Peterson GFM (1992): The effect of dietary inclusion of yeast culture (Yea-Sacc) on patterns of rumen fermentation, food intake and growth of intensively fed bulls. Animal Production 55, 35-40.
18. Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Chen XB, Mcintosh FM (1995): Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1811-1818.
19. Newbold CJ, McIntosh FM, Wallace RJ (1998): Changes in the microbial population of a rumen-simulating fermenter in response to yeast culture. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78, 241-244.
20. Nisbet DJ, Martin SA (1991): Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Journal of Animal Science 69, 4628-4633.
21. Oeztuerk H (2009): Effects of live and autoclaved yeast cultures on ruminal fermentation in vitro. Journal of Animal and Feed Science 18, 142-150.
22. Oeztuerk H, Schroeder B, Beyerbach M, Breves G (2005): Influence of living and autoclaved yeasts of Saccharomyces boulardii on in vitro ruminal microbial metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2594-2600.
23. OJEU (2003): Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition. Official Journal of European Union. Page L268/36 in OJEU of 18/10/2003.
24. Opsi F, Fortina R, Tassone S, Bodas R, Lopez S (2012): Effects of inactivated and live cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro ruminal fermentation of diets with different forage:concentrate ratio. Journal of Agricultural Science 150, 271-283.
25. Thrune M, Bach A, Ruiz-Moreno M, Stern MD, Linn JG (2009): Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal pH and microbial fermentation in dairy cows: Yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation. Livestock Science 124, 261-265.
26. Tripathi MK, Karim SE (2011): Effect of yeast cultures supplementation on live weight change, rumen fermentation, ciliate protozoa population, microbial hydrolytic enzymes status and slaughtering performance of growing lamb. Livestock Science 135, 17-25.
27. Vyas D, Uwizeye A, Mohammed R, Yang WZ, Walker ND, Beauchemin KA (2014): The effects of active dried and killed dried yeast on subacute ruminal acidosis, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 724-732.
28. Wallace RJ, Czerkawski JW, Breckenridge G (1981): Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 131-148.
29. Weatherburn MW (1967): Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39, 971-974.
30. Williams PEV, Tait CAG, Innes GM, Newbold CJ (1991): Effects of the inclusion of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae plus growth medium) in the diet of dairy cows on milk yield and forage degradation and fermentation patterns in the rumen of steers. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3016-3026.
31. Wolin MJ (1960): A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. Journal of Dairy Science 40, 1452-1459.
32. Young JW (1977): Gluconeogenesis in cattle: significance and methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 1-15.