Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty

Organization Science

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 304-322

  Szulanski, Gabriel ^a   Ringov, Dimo ^b   Jensen, Robert J ^c  

^a INSEAD   (Singapore)

^b ESADE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge transfer; Knowledge transfer methods; Knowledge transfer process; Organizational learning; Stickiness; Tacit knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963509920     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2016.1049     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. 25(1):107-136.
2. Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905-917.
3. Almeida P, Song J, Grant RM (2002) Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organ. Sci. 13(2):147-161.
4. Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).
5. Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123-1137.
6. Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571-582.
7. Arrow KJ (1974) The Limits of Organization (W. W. Norton, New York).
8. Asmussen CG, Foss NJ, Pedersen T (2013) Knowledge transfer and accommodation effects in multinational corporations evidence from European subsidiaries. J. Management 39(6):1397-1429.
9. Axelrod RM, Cohen MD (1999) Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier (Free Press, New York).
10. Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312-330.
11. Bingham CB, Davis JP (2012) Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Management J. 55(3):611-641.
12. Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. J. Management Stud. 30(6):863-884.
13. Boland RJ Jr, Tenkasi RV (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4):350-372.
14. Brannen MY, Liker JK, Fruin WM (1999) Recontextualization and Factory-to-Factory Knowledge Transfer from Japan to the United States (Oxford University Press, New York).
15. Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40-57.
16. Carte T, Chidambaram L (2004) A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(11-12):448-471.
17. Chew WB, Bresnahan TF, Clark KB (1990) Measurement, coordination, and learning in a multiplant network. Kaplan RS, ed. Measures for Manufacturing Excellence (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 129-162.
18. Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554-568.
19. Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7(5):477-501.
20. Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5): 554-571.
21. Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750-1762.
22. De Dreu CK, Van Vianen AE (2001) Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. J. Organ. Behav. 22(3):309-328.
23. Doz YL, Santos J, Williamson P (2001) From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
24. Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3):345-367.
25. Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350-383.
26. Ellis KM, Reus TH, Lamont BT, Ranft AL (2011) Transfer effects in large acquisitions: How size-specific experience matters. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1261-1276.
27. Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94-118.
28. Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psych. Bull. 76(5):378-382.
29. Gersick C (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9-41.
30. Gersick CJ (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32(2):274-309.
31. Gibson JL (1977) A theory of affordances. Shaw R, Bransford J, eds. Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ), 67-82.
32. Gilovich T (1991) How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life (Free Press, New York).
33. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109-122.
34. Gupta AK, Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 21(4):473-496.
35. Haas MR, Hansen MT (2005) When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. 26(1):1-24.
36. Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1133-1153.
37. Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82-111.
38. Hansen MT, Lovas B (2004) How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):801-822.
39. Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T (1999) What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(2):106-116.
40. Harinck F, De Dreu CK, Van Vianen AE (2000) The impact of conflict issues on fixed-pie perceptions, problem solving, and integrative outcomes in negotiation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81(2):329-358.
41. Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324-343.
42. Hollingshead AB (1998) Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(5): 423-442.
43. Hoopes DG, Postrel S (1999) Shared knowledge, "glitches," and product development performance. Strategic Management J. 20(9): 837-865.
44. Howell RD (1987) Covariance structure modeling and measurement issues: A note on "interrelations among a channel entity's power sources." J. Marketing Res. 24(1):119-126.
45. Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2):441-456.
46. Inkpen AC, Dinur A (1998) Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. 9(4):454-468.
47. Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S (2015) Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding "technologies of rationality" in practice. Strategic Management J. 36(4):537-558.
48. Jehn KA (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):530-557.
49. Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741-763.
50. King AW (2007) Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):156-178.
51. King AW, Zeithaml CP (2001) Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management J. 22(1):75-99.
52. Ko DG, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Quart. 29(1):59-85.
53. Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3): 383-397.
54. Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 24(4):625-645.
55. Lawless MW (1987) Institutionalization of a management science innovation in police departments. Management Sci. 33(2):244-252.
56. Leonard-Barton D, Sinha DK (1993) Developer-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Acad. Management J. 36(5):1125-1139.
57. Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147-167.
58. Lewis K (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. 50(11):1519-1533.
59. Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (1982) Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):418-438.
60. Majchrzak A, Markus ML (2013) Technology affordances and constraints theory (of MIS). Kessler E, ed. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 832-836.
61. Majchrzak A, Cooper LP, Neece OE (2004) Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. 50(2):174-188.
62. Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, Mertens A (2015) Greater innovation by the crowd in crowdsourcing: The sequencing of knowledge types that balance divergence and convergence. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
63. Majchrzak A, More PH, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951-970.
64. Malhotra A, Majchrzak A (2012) How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 3(1):1-14.
65. Mansfield E, Romeo A, Schwartz M, Teece D, Wagner S, Brach P (1983) New findings in technology transfer, productivity and development. Res. Management 26(March-April):11-20.
66. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).
67. Markus ML (1994) Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. 5(4):502-527.
68. Marsden PV (1990) Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Sociology 16(1990):435-463.
69. Martin X, Salomon R (2003) Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(4):356-373.
70. Miller KD, Zhao M, Calantone RJ (2006) Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March's exploration-exploitation model. Acad. Management J. 49(4):709-722.
71. Moorman C, Miner AS (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):698-723.
72. Moreland RL (1999) Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Thompson LL, Levine JM, Messick DM, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3-32.
73. Murnighan JK, Conlon DE (1991) The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):165-186.
74. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).
75. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14-37.
76. Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249-273.
77. Pelled LH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organ. Sci. 7(6):615-631.
78. Pisano GP (1996) Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology. Res. Policy 25(7):1097-1119.
79. Polanyi M (1966) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Chicago University Press, Chicago).
80. Powell TC, Lovallo D, Caringal C (2006) Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):175-196.
81. Ranft AL, Lord MD (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organ. Sci. 13(4):420-443.
82. Reed R, DeFillippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):88-102.
83. Reus TH, Lamont BT, Ellis KM (2015) A darker side of knowledge transfer following international acquisitions. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print April 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2373.
84. Reus TH, Ranft AL, Lamont BT, Adams GL (2009) An interpretive systems view of knowledge investments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):382-400.
85. Rivkin JW (2001) Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. 12(3):274-293.
86. Rogers E (1983) The Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).
87. Ryall MD (2009) Causal ambiguity, complexity, and capability-based advantage. Management Sci. 55(3):389-403.
88. Ryle G (1949) The Concept of Mind (Hutchinson, London).
89. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Chicago).
90. Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 20(7):595-623.
91. Stasser G, Stewart DD, Wittenbaum GM (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(3): 244-265.
92. Subramaniam M, Venkatraman N (2001) Determinants of transnational new product development capability: Testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management J. 22(4):359-382.
93. Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27-43.
94. Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9-27.
95. Szulanski G (2003) Sticky Knowledge: Barriers to Knowing in the Firm (Sage, London).
96. Szulanski G, Casaburi MV (2004a) Rank Xerox (B): Is "telemarketing" the answer? (INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France).
97. Szulanski G, Casaburi MV (2004b) Rank Xerox (C): The success of telesales. (INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France).
98. Teece DJ (1976) The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer, 1st ed. (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA).
99. Teece D (1977) Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of international technology transfer. Econom. J. 87(346):242-261.
100. Torgerson WS (1952) Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 17(4):401-419.
101. Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):941-957.
102. Tulving E (1985) How many memory systems are there? Amer. Psychologist 40(4):385-398.
103. Van de Ven AH (1992) Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):169-188.
104. Van Wijk R, Jansen JJP, Lyles MA (2008) Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. J. Management Stud. 45(4): 830-853.
105. Von Hippel E, Tyre MJ (1995) How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Res. Policy 24(1):1-12.
106. Wegner DM (1995) A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cognition 13(3):319-339.
107. White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817-838.
108. Winter SG (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. Teece DJ, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 159-184.
109. Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge of the firm and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76-92.
110. Zhao ZJ, Anand J (2013) Beyond boundary spanners: The "collective bridge" as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1513-1530.