Beyond boundary spanners: The 'collective bridge' as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 1513-1530

  Zhao, Zheng Jane ^a   Anand, Jaideep ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

boundary spanners; collective bridge; collective knowledge; complexity; knowledge transfer; organizational structures

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; PLANNING;

BOUNDARY SPANNERS; COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE; COMPLEXITY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84886599747     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2080     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahuja G,. 2000. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 317-343.
2. Aldrich H, Herker D,. 1977. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review 2 (2): 217-230.
3. Allen T, Tushman ML, Lee DMS,. 1979. Technology transfer as a function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical services. Academy of Management Journal 22 (4): 694-708.
4. Ancona DG,. 1990. Outward bound: strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 334-365.
5. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF,. 1992. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 3 (3): 321-341.
6. Argote L, Ingram P, Levine JM, Moreland RL,. 2000. Knowledge transfer in organizations: learning from the experience of others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 82: 1-8.
7. Arrow KJ,. 1974. The Limits of Organization. Norton Co: New York.
8. Bouty I,. 2000. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal 43 (1): 50-65.
9. Burt RS,. 1992. Structural Holes (1st edn). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, and London, UK.
10. Carlile P,. 2002. A pracmatic view of knoweldge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13 (4): 442-455.
11. Carlile PR,. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15 (5): 555-568.
12. Coleman J,. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95-120.
13. Conway S,. 1997. Strategic personal links in successful innovation: link-pins, bridges, and liaisons. Creativity and Innovation Management 6 (4): 226-233.
14. Cramton CD,. 2001. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science 12 (3): 346-371.
15. Deci EL,. 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. Plenum Press: New York and London, UK.
16. Deci EL, Ryan RM,. 1985. The general causality orientation scale: self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality 19: 109-134.
17. Dollinger MJ,. 1984. Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal 27 (2): 351-368.
18. Grant RM,. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue 17: 109-122.
19. Hansen MT,. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1): 82-111.
20. Hansen MT,. 2002. Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science 13 (3): 232-248.
21. Hansen MT, Nohria N,. 2004. How to build collaborative advantage. Sloan Management Review 46 (1): 22-30.
22. Katz R, Tushman ML,. 1983. A longitudinal study of the effects of boundary spanning supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development. Academy of Management Journal 26 (3): 437-456.
23. Leifer R, Delbecq A,. 1978. Organizational/environmental interchange: a model of boundary spanning activity. Academy of Management Review 3 (1): 40-50.
24. March JG, Simon HA,. 1958. Organizations. Wiley: New York.
25. Marrone JA, Tesluk PE, Carson JB,. 2007. A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal 50 (6): 1423-1439.
26. Nelson RR, Winter S,. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1st edn). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, and London, UK.
27. Nickerson JA, Zenger TR,. 2004. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science 15 (6): 617-632.
28. Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A,. 2012. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38 (4): 1115-1166.
29. Pil FK, Cohen SK,. 2006. Modularity: implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 995-1011.
30. Reagans R, McEvily B,. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2): 240-267.
31. Rivkin JW,. 2000. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science 46 (6): 824.
32. Rousseau DM,. 1998. Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19 (3): 217-233.
33. Simon HA,. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467-482.
34. Simonin B,. 1991. Transfer of knowledge in international strategic alliances: a structural approach. In Business Admininstration, Business School. University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI.
35. Simonin BL,. 1999. Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: an empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies 30 (3): 463-490.
36. Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L,. 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy 35 (7): 994-1017.
37. Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM,. 2007. Are your engineers talking to one another when they should? Harvard Business Review (November): 1-8.
38. Spender JC,. 1996. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue 17: 45-62.
39. Szulanski G,. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter 17: 27-43.
40. Tushman ML, Scanlan TJ,. 1981a. Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal 24 (2): 289-305.
41. Tushman ML, Scanlan TJ,. 1981b. Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal 24 (1): 83-98.
42. Uzzi B,. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67.
43. Winter SG,. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Teece DJ, (ed). Ballinger: Cambridge, MA.
44. Winter SG, Szulanski G,. 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science 12 (6): 730-743.
45. Zander U, Kogut B,. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science 6 (1): 76-92.
46. Zhao ZJ,. 2005. Toward a Multilevel Knowledge Transfer Paradigm: Acquiring Engineering Capabilities in the Chinese Automotive Industry. University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, Michigan.
47. Zhao ZJ, Anand J,. 2009. A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strategic Management Journal 30 (9): 959-984.
48. Zhao ZJ, Anand J, Mitchell W,. 2005. A dual networks perspective on inter-organizational transfer of R&D capabilities: international joint ventures in the Chinese automotive industry. Journal of Management Studies 42 (1): 127-160.