A Review of Sampling Effects and Response Bias in Internet Participatory Mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI)

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 39-56

  Brown, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE;

DATA SAMPLING; META-ANALYSIS; PARTICIPATORY GIS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; RESPONSE BIAS; RESPONSE RATE; SAMPLING EFFECTS; SPATIAL DATA QUALITY; SYSTEMATIC STUDY; VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION;

MAPPING;

GIS; INTERNET; MAPPING; SAMPLING BIAS; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 84962834570     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: 14679671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12207     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Auricht C M, Raymond C, Thackway R, and Imgraben S 2014 Development of Socioecological Sub-regional Boundaries for Natural Resources Management in the South East NRM Region. Brighton, South Australia, Auricht Projects (Report prepared for SE NRM Board)
2. Beverly J, Uto K, Wilkes J, and Bothwell P 2008 Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 289–303
3. Beierle T 1999 Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Studies Review 16: 75–103
4. Brown G 2012 Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal 24(2): 7–18
5. Brown G 2013 Relationships between spatial and non-spatial preferences and place-based values in national forests. Applied Geography 44: 1–11
6. Brown G 2015 Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgment for land use planning using public participation geographic information systems. Australian Planner 52: 199–209.
7. Brown G and Brabyn L 2012 An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landscape and Urban Planning 107: 317–31
8. Brown G and Donovan S 2014 Measuring change in place values for environmental and natural resource planning using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): Results and challenges for longitudinal research. Society and Natural Resources 27: 36–54
9. Brown G, Hausner V, Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska A, Olszańska A, Peek B, Rechciński M, and Lagreid E 2015 A cross-cultural study of protected area values and management preferences in Norway and Poland. Journal for Nature Conservation 28: 89–104
10. Brown G, Hausner V, and Lagreid E 2015 Physical landscape associations with mapped ecosystem values with implications for spatial value transfer: An empirical study from Norway. Ecosystem Services 15: 19–34
11. Brown G, Kelly M, and Whitall D 2014a Which “public”? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) systems for public lands management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57: 190–214
12. Brown G, Weber D, and de Bie K 2014b Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Applied Geography 53: 77–89
13. Brown G and Kytta M 2014 Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 46: 122–36
14. Brown G, Montag J, and Lyon K 2012a Public Participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Society and Natural Resources 25: 633–51
15. Brown G, Weber D, Zanon D, and de Bie K 2012b Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24: 534–45
16. Brown G and Reed P 2009 Public Participation GIS: A new method for national forest planning. Forest Science 55: 166–82
17. Brown G, Reed P, and Harris C C 2002 Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Applied Geography 22: 49–77
18. Brown G, Schebella M F, and Weber D 2014 Using Participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning 121: 34–44
19. Brown G and Weber D 2011 Public Participation GIS: A new method for use in national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 102: 1–15
20. Brown G and Weber D 2012 Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Applied Geography 34: 316–24
21. Cox C, Morse W, Anderson C, and Marzen L 2014 Applying public participation geographic information systems to wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 19: 200–14
22. Cox C, Morse W, Anderson C, and Marzen L 2015 Using public participation geographic information systems to identify places of watershed service provisioning. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 51:704–718
23. Curtin R, Presser S, and Singer E 2005 Changes in telephone survey non-response over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 87–98
24. de Leeuw E and de Heer W 2002 Trends in household survey non-response: A longitudinal and international comparison. In Groves R M, Dillman D A, Eltinge J L, and Roderick J A (eds) Survey Non-Response. New York, John Wiley and Sons: 41–54
25. Dietz T and Stern P (eds) 2008 Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision-making. Washington, DC, National Academies Press
26. Dillman D A 1978 Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method for Surveys. New York, John Wiley and Sons
27. Girres J and Touya G 2010 Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS 12: 435–59
28. Goodchild M F 2007 Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69: 211–21
29. Groves R, Cialdini R, and Couper M 1992 Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 475–95
30. Groves R, Singer E, and Corning A 2001 Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 299–308
31. Hall G B, Chipeniuk R, Feick R D, Leahy M G, and Deparday V 2010 Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24: 761–81
32. Haklay M 2010 How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environmental Planning B 37: 682–703
33. Haklay M, Basiouka S, Antoniou V, and Ather A 2010 How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus' law to volunteered geographic information. Cartographical Journal 47: 315–22
34. Hannon B 1994 Sense of place: Geographic discounting by people, animals and plants. Ecological Economics 10: 157–74
35. Hausner V, Brown G, and Lagreid E 2015 Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway. Land Use Policy 49: 446–61
36. Kaminska O, McCutcheon A, and Billiet J 2010 Satisficing among reluctant respondents in a cross-national context. Public Opinion Quarterly 74: 956–84
37. Karimi A, Brown G, and Hockings M 2015 Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots. Applied Geography 63: 9–20
38. Kleinhans R, Van Ham M, and Evans-Cowley J 2015 Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance. Planning Practice and Research 30: 237–47
39. Krosnick J A 1991 Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213–36
40. Mukherjee F 2015 Public Participatory GIS. Geography Compass 9: 384–94
41. NCGIA 1996a Summary Report: GIS and Society Workshop, South Haven, Minnesota, 2-5 March, 1996. Santa Barbara, CA, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
42. NCGIA 1996b Summary Report: Public Participation GIS Workshop, Orono, Maine, 10-13 July, 1996. Santa Barbara, CA, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
43. NZ DOC (New Zealand Department of Conservation) 2011 Identifying Conservation Values, Park Experiences, and Development Preferences in the Southland Region of New Zealand. WWW document, http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/aboutdoc/role/policies-and-plans/cms/southland-values-survey-results.pdf
44. Pocewicz A and Nielsen-Pincus M 2013 Preferences of Wyoming residents for siting of energy and residential development. Applied Geography 43: 45–55
45. Pocewicz A, Nielsen-Pincus M, Brown G, and Schnitzer R 2012 An evaluation of Internet versus paper-based methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS 16: 39–53
46. Rambaldi G, Kwaku Kyem A P, Mbile P, McCall M, and Weiner D 2006 Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 25: 1–9
47. Schlossberg M and Shuford E 2005 Delineating “public” and “participation” in PPGIS. URISA Journal 16(2): 15–26
48. Schroeder B 2014 Mapping Landscape Values and Forest Uses on the Tongass National Forest. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alaska
49. Sieber R 2006 Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96: 491–507
50. Spielman S E 2014 Spatial collective intelligence? Credibility, accuracy, and volunteered geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 41: 115–24
51. Tulloch D 2008 Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal 72: 161–71
52. Veilleux A 2013 Recreational Knowledge, Concern and Behavior for a Resource: A Spatial and Descriptive Analysis of Squam Lakes, NH Using Public Participation GIS. Unpublished MS Thesis, Plymouth State University
53. Wolf I, Wohlfart T, Brown G, and Bartolome Lasa A 2015 The use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for park visitor management: A case study of mountain biking. Tourism Management 51: 112–30
54. Yankelovich D 1991 Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse, NY, Syracuse University Press