Applying Public Participation Geographic Information Systems to Wildlife Management

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 200-214

  Cox, Cody ^a   Morse, Wayde ^a   Anderson, Christopher ^a   Marzen, Luke ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaboration; conservation; GIS; participatory planning; spatial targeting

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897883821     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2014.871663     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alabama Natural Heritage Program. (2011). Alabama inventory list: The rare, threatened, & endangered plants & animals of Alabama. Montgomery, AL: Alabama Natural Heritage Program.
2. Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., & Brown, G. (2008). Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 27-39.
3. Bengston, D. N., Fletcher, J. O., & Nelson, K. C. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 271-286.
4. Brown, G. (2005). Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 17-39.
5. Brown, G. (2006). Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8, 101-113.
6. Brown, G. (2012). An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied Geography, 34, 289-294.
7. Brown, G., & Pullar, D. V. (2012). An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 231-246.
8. Brown, G., Smith, C., Alessa, L., & Kliskey, A. (2004). A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography, 24, 161-180.
9. Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2012). A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 455-473.
10. Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C. M., Crossman, N. D., & King, D. (2010). Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conservation Biology, 25, 172-181.
11. Burgman, M. A., & Fox, J. C. (2003). Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: Implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Animal Conservation, 6, 19-28.
12. Dillman, D., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys - The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Don Carlos, A. W., Bright, A. D., Teel, T. L., & Vaske, J. J. (2009). Human-black bear conflict in urban areas: An integrated approach to management response. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 174-184.
14. Donovan, S. M., Looney, C., Hanson, T., Sanchez de Leon, Y., Wulfhorst, J. D., Eigenbrode, S. D., Bosque Perez, N. A. (2009). Reconciling social and biological needs in an endangered ecosystem: The Palouse as a model for bioregional planning. Ecology and Society, 14, 9.
15. Krester, H. E., Curtis, P. D., & Knuth, B. A. (2009). Landscape, social, and spatial influences on perceptions of human-black bear interactions in the Adirondack Park, NY. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 393-406.
16. Lowery, D. R., Morse, W. C., & Steury, T. C. (2012). Biological and social investigation of human-black bear conflicts in the panhandle of Florida. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17, 193-206.
17. Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey models: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 79-104.
18. Manfredo, M. J., Decker, D. J., & Duda, M. D. (1998). What is the future for human dimensions of wildlife? Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 64, 278-292.
19. Morse, W. (2012). Changing stakeholders and the planning process. In D. N. Laband, B. G. Lockaby, & W. Zipperer (Eds.), Urban-rural interfaces: Linking people and nature (pp. 201-224). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
20. Morzillo, A. T., Mertig, A. G., Garner, N., & Liu, J. (2007). Spatial distribution of attitudes toward proposed management strategies for a wildlife recovery. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12, 15-29.
21. Moyer, M. A., McCown, J. W., & Oli, M. K. (2007). Factors influencing home-range size of female Florida black bears. Journal of Mammalogy, 88, 468-476.
22. Nielsen-Pincus, M. (2011). Mapping a values typology in three counties of the interior Northwest, USA: Scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights. Society & Natural Resources, 24, 535-552.
23. Patterson, M. E., Montag, J. M., & Williams, D. R. (2003). The urbanization of wildlife management: Social science, conflict, and decision making. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1, 171-183.
24. Pocewicz, A., Brown, G., Nielsen-Pincus, M., & Schnitzer, R. (2012). An evaluation of internet versus paper-based methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS, 16, 39-53.
25. Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas, T. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68, 1301-1315.
26. Riley, S. J., Decker, D. J., Carpenter, L. H., Organ, J. H., Siemer, W. F., Mattfield, G. F., & Parsons, G. (2002). The essence of wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 585-593.
27. Schusler, T. M., Decker, D. J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 15, 309-326.
28. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 491-507.
29. Silvano, A. L., Grand, J. B., Irwin, E. R., Kleiner, K. J., Mackenzie, M. D., Mitchell, M. S.,. Williams, S. G. (2007). Provisional predicted habitat distribution map of Alabama. Auburn, AL: Alabama Gap Analysis Project. Retrieved from www.auburn.edu/gap
30. Smith, P. D., & McDonough, M. H. (2001). Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society & Natural Resources, 14, 239-249.
31. Theobald, D. M., Spies, T., Kline, J., Maxwell, B., Hobbs, N. T., & Dale, V. (2005). Ecological support for rural land-use planning. Ecological Applications, 15, 1906-1914.
32. Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treves, L., & Morales, A. (2006). Co-managing human-wildlife conflicts: A review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11, 383-396.
33. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). State quickfacts: Alabama. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov
34. Zhu, X., Pfueller, S., Whitelaw, P., & Winter, C. (2010). Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management, 45, 896-911.