Analytical modelling of near-source pulse-like seismic demand for multi-linear backbone oscillators

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1797-1815

  Baltzopoulos, Georgios ^a   Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios ^b   Iervolino, Iunio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

forward directivity; incremental dynamic analysis (IDA); inelastic response; near fault; pushover

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODELS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ELASTOPLASTICITY; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

FORWARD DIRECTIVITY; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; INELASTIC RESPONSE; NEAR FAULT; PUSHOVER;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; ELASTOPLASTICITY; FAULT; GROUND MOTION; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OSCILLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84962629044     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2729     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Krawinkler H, Miranda E. Performance-based earthquake engineering. In: Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds). CRC Press: FL, 2004.
2. Singh PJ. Earthquake ground motions: implications for designing structures and reconciling structural damage. Earthquake Spectra 1985; 1(2):239–270.
3. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters 1997; 68:199–222.
4. Baker JW. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2007; 97(5):1486–1501.
5. Kalkan E, Kunnath SK. Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings. Engineering Structures 2007; 29:305–316.
6. Fragiadakis M, Vamvatsikos D, Ascheim M. Application of nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of regular RC moment frame buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2014; 30(2):767–794.
7. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:979–993.
8. Baltzopoulos G, Chioccarelli C, Iervolino I. The displacement coefficient method in near-source conditions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2015; 44(7):1015–1033.
9. Lignos D, Krawinkler H. Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations. Report No.177, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 2012.
10. Liel AB, Haselton CB, Deirlein GG. Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: comparative assessment of nonductile and ductile moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 2011; 137(4):492–502.
11. Adam C, Clemens J. Seismic collapse capacity of basic inelastic structures vulnerable to the P-delta effect. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012; 41:775–793.
12. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491–514.
13. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:1097–1117.
14. ® implementations available online at: http://users.ntua.gr/divamva/software/spo2ida-allt.xls, http://users.ntua.gr/divamva/software/spo2ida-allt.zip
15. Shahi SK, Baker JW. An efficient algorithm to identify strong velocity pulses in multi-component ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2014; 104(5):2456–2466.
16. Iervolino I, Chioccarelli C, Baltzopoulos G. Inelastic displacement ratio of near-source pulse-like ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012; 41:2351–2357.
17. Baltzopoulos G, Structural performance evaluation in near-source conditions, PhD Thesis: Advisor I. Iervolino, Doctorate programme in Seismic Risk, XXVII cycle, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy, 2015. http://wpage.unina.it/iuniervo/doc_en/Students.html
18. Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A. Characterization of forward directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2004; 24(11):815–828.
19. Ruiz-Garcìa J. Inelastic displacement ratios for seismic assessment of structures subjected to forward-directivity near-fault ground motions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2011; 15(3):449–468.
20. Makris N, Black CJ. Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2004; 130(9):1019–1031.
21. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering 1993; 119(12):3503–3519.
22. Tothong P, Cornell CA, Baker JW. Explicit directivity-pulse inclusion in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23:867–891.
23. Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I. Near-source seismic hazard and design scenarios. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2013; 42:603–622.
24. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):523–553.
25. Akkar S, Yazgan U, Gülkan P. Deformation limits for simple non-degrading systems subjected to near-fault ground motions. Proceedings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver BC, Canada, Paper no. 2276, 2004.
26. Alavi B, Krawinkler H. Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33(6):687–706.
27. Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Report No.152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 2005.
28. Rahnama M, Krawinkler H. Effects of soft soils and hysteresis model on seismic demands. Report No. 108, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 1993.
29. Dolsek M, Fajfar P. Inelastic spectra for infilled concrete frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:1395–1416.
30. Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126(10):1150–1159.
31. Shome N, Cornell CA. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. RMS Report-35. Reliability of Marine Structures Group, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 1999.
32. Bates DM, Watt DG. Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc,: New York, 1988.
33. Miranda E. Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra. Journal of Structural Engineering 1993; 119(5):1319–1338.
34. Dimakopoulou V, Fragiadakis M, Spyrakos C. Influence of modeling parameters on the response of degrading systems to near-field ground motions. Engineering Structures 2013; 53:10–24.
35. Baltzopoulos G, Vamvatsikos D, Iervolino I. Near-source pulse-like seismic demand for multi-linear backbone oscillators. COMPDYN 2015, 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, V. Plevris (eds.) Crete Island, Greece, 25–27 May 2015.
36. Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes DC. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. Mc-Graw Hill: New York, 1974.
37. Welch BL. The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika 1938; 29:350–362.
38. Iervolino I, De Luca F, Cosenza E. Spectral shape-based assessment of SDOF nonlinear response to real, adjusted and artificial accelerograms. Engineering Structures 2010; 32(9):2776–2792.
39. Iervolino I, Cornell CA. Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(3):685–713.
40. Shatterthwaite FE. Synthesis of variance. Psychometrica 1941; 6(5):309–316.
41. Chopra A, Chintanapakdee C. Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(9):1309–1319.
42. Electronic supplement to Analytical modelling of near-source pulse-like seismic demand for multi-linear backbone oscillators available online at: http://wpage.unina.it/iuniervo/PulseIDAs_matlab_scripts.rar
43. Tothong P, Cornell CA. Structural performance assessment under near-source pulse-like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37(7):1013–1037.
44. Song S, Heaton TH. Predicting collapse of steel and reinforced-concrete frame buildings in different types of ground motions. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 2012.
45. Champion C, Liel A. The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012; 41:1391–1409.