Inelastic displacement ratio of near-source pulse-like ground motions

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 41, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 2351-2357

  Iervolino, Iunio ^a   Chioccarelli, Eugenio ^a   Baltzopoulos, Georgios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coefficient method; Forward directivity; Near fault

Indexed keywords

STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

COEFFICIENT METHODS; COMMON GROUND; DATA SETS; DIFFERENT SHAPES; DIRECTIVITY; EMPIRICAL DATA; GROUND MOTIONS; INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT RATIOS; NEAR-FAULT; PULSE PERIOD; PULSE-LIKE; RESPONSE SPECTRA; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SOFT SOILS; SPECTRAL ORDINATES; SPECTRAL SHAPES; STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENTS;

ASPECT RATIO;

DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; ELASTICITY; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOFT SOIL; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84868133147     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2167     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA. Modification of empirical strong motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effect of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters 1997; 68(1): 199-222.
2. Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I. Near-source seismic demand and pulse-like records: a discussion for L'Aquila earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010; 39(9):1039-1062.
3. Tothong P, Cornell CA, Baker JW. Explicit directivity-pulse inclusion in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23(4):867-891.
4. Shahi S, Baker JW. An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2011; 101(2):742-755.
5. Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I. Near-source seismic hazard and design scenarios, 2011. (in review)
6. Ruiz-Garcìa J, Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(8):1237-125.
7. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28(9):979-993.
8. Ruiz-Garcìa J, Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soil sites. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(6):679-694.
9. Baez JI, Miranda E. Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field. Proc. of the Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, NZ, 2000; paper no. 1561.
10. Akkar SD, Yazgan U, Gulkan P. Deformation limits for simple non-degrading systems subjected to near-fault ground motions. Proc. of the Thirteen World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, CAN, 2004; paper no. 2276.
11. Ruiz-Garcìa J. Inelastic displacement ratios for seismic assessment of structures subjected to forward-directivity near-fault ground motions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2011; 15(3):449-468.
12. Baker JW. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2007; 97(5):1486-1501.
13. Iervolino I, Cornell CA. Probability of occurrence of velocity pulses in near-source ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2008; 98(5):2262-2277.
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Report FEMA 440. Washington DC, US, 2005.
15. Bates DM, Watts DG. Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley: New York, 1988.
16. Baker JW. Identification of near-fault velocity and prediction of resulting response spectra. Proceeding of Geotechnical Earthquake Engn. Struct. Dyn. IV, Sacramento, CA, 2008.
17. Baltzopoulos G. Effect of near-source directivity on inelastic spectral amplification. Earthquake Resistant Structural Design M.Sc. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, Advisor: I. Iervolino, 2011.